Skip to main content

The problem with social media is, what if they are biased?

 

The problem with social media is, what if they are biased?

The problem with social media is that there is no way to give rules for things, what people are publishing in that media. That kind of thing is called censorship, but the problem is that what if somebody would use social media to make violent actions against other people. And then another thing is cheating.

How many people must tolerate things like spreading medical records or something like that? This is the thing, that we should think about when we are using social media. If we are thinking about things like publishing things, most people would be acting correctly, but then some of the users of the social media use that thing wrong. 

When we are thinking about this kind of situation the similar case is in history. America's highway patrolmen commented on some motorbike gangs, they said that 99% of bikers were normal people, who followed the law, but 1% of them wanted to be outlaws. That one percent is the symbol for the motorbikers, who would not want to live in the society. 

And the same thing is visible on the Internet. Most of the people want to be polite, and then some of them want to be some famous trollers, who would target almost everybody in the world. The thing that they are used as an argument on the Internet is that they have the right to say, what they want. 

Censorship is a tough term. It is often connected with dictatorship and other things like secret police. The thing is that the far way radicals are people, who are considering the freedom of the speech and they are saying that the government is removing their opinions. But there are governments on the Earth, which are corrupted and non-democratic, which are using far-wing radicals as the excuse for censoring social media. 

The most common misuse of freedom of speech is cheating and provocating people. And that thing is one of the most problematic things in the world. How to describe cheating or provocation? And what kind of provocation is prohibited? Is every image what doesn't please some people some kind provocation? 

So there is a question of more than some kind moderation. There is a question what is the thing, what would justify banning some homepages or texts? Is the thing that some moderators just don't like some text the reason for removing that thing from social media? Or should there be some common orders about that kind of thing? And who describes the frames of the line? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of