Skip to main content

Can words kill people?

 


Can words kill people?

The answer is "yes" there is a possibility that the regular people are named as the informants of Police. And if those people are living in areas, that are controlled by criminal organizations, that kind of thing can cause problems. Also if the members of some gangs are named as the traitors, that kind of thing can cause revenge. The most traditional way to use words to justify violence is propaganda. The fake news is the most traditional way to deliver lies. 

Above this text is the propaganda poster from WWII. In modern propaganda, in a key role is the deep fake news, which is shared as the real information in the social media platforms. If that deep fake information is made carefully, that thing is almost impossible to separate from the real film. And also the psychological profile would make it possible to target that propaganda to the people, who want to believe it. That will help to share that thing on social media platforms. 

If somebody wants to believe that some side of the conflict is evil, the propaganda is more effective. Willing to believe makes a person unable to observe the information. Also, things like anger are causing the ability to estimate information is decreased. This is the key element in propaganda operations. Making people believe in lies, sweet little lies. 

And the fake news is only the new name for the propaganda or INFO-OPS. Information operations are an effective way to control the mind of the people. How effective that method is, depends on the source of information. If the source of information is commonly trusted and delivers the confirmed information, that thing gives more effect to faked information than if the source is seen as the deputy of some part of the conflict. 

So that means that the captured Twitter- and other social media accounts are causing very big troubles. Or what would you think about the situation that somebody is capturing the Twitter account of the President of The United States of America? Then that person can use that account to deliver things like Nazi-propaganda. That thing can cause a really bad problem for the reputation of that person and the entire nation. These kinds of things are a great danger to international relationships.

In modern propaganda or INFO-OPS, the deep fake images are bringing the new "spice" for that kind of action. The deep fakes are allowing to share faked and very impressive propaganda, which is hard to separate from the real information. 

The INFO-OPS means just simple sharing faked information. One of the versions of that kind of operation is just blamed the opposite side about crimes. The thing is that this kind of action can be done by using the homepages, and film material, where the people would just acting. This kind of movies can, of course, show authentic actions, but the players of those films might be actors, who play the opposite side fighters. 

When we are looking at those things, we must realize that there are always seen things like dead children. And the reason for that kind of thing is just making sympathy for own side. The world is full of dirty tricks and one of them is to make the headquarters under the shelter of the regular people. The attack against that kind of shelter just causes a very big number of civilian casualties. 

When we are thinking about this kind of way to handle things in the war, we must remember that there are no gentlemen. War is not the game, and the only thing that matters in the nation, what is in the middle of the conflict is the effect of its weapons. But even if the opposite side is disadvantaged there is a possibility that successful media or INFO-OPS (read: propaganda) would decline the opposite side to stop its military actions. And the best way to make that thing is to win the sympathy to own side. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of