Skip to main content

Electronegativity and STEALTH technology

 
Image I


Electronegativity and STEALTH technology

1) Is the energy vampire thing like positive ion, what pulls the electrons out from the material? 

Have you ever heard YF-23 "Black Widow II" aircraft? (Image I)That aircraft was created by Northrop-Grumman for a competitor to F-22 "Lightning II" STEALTH interceptor- attack aircraft. The two produced YF-23 have been stored in the museum and the project is officially closed. But there is a strange similarity with the cloud at the lower image (Image II) and YF-23 test planes, and there is one thing, what I have always thought. 

There is a possibility that some test planes have been made by using the UFO-observations as the source. But the question is, why those UFO observations are told to the government? There is a possibility that the brains of the people have been captured, or they have been stimulated by using some kind of electric vortex. 

Image II


2) Is the electronegativity the answer for the next-generation STEALTH?

The electronegative layer above the outer layer of the aircraft would turn it STEALTH, and that thing doesn't need the special forms. The electronegative particle would pull all radio waves in it, and that thing makes the craft invisible on the radar. The hydrogen ions or protons are the electronegative things, and one version of the thing, what benefits the electronegativity is the thing, what is called the "energy vampire". That means that the energy vampire will pull the electrons away from the object. 

The idea of this kind of thing is that some people just borrow the small part of the creativity of the person, and then they could use the stories, what those people tell as the source for creating the new type of aircraft and other solutions. One of the most incredible and at the same time weird solution in the material research is the proton layer, which will pull all electrons in it. The proton itself is the hydrogen ion and one of the most electronegative things in the world. 

3) Can electronegative layers transfer electrons and electricity straight from the air?

If we could create the electronegative particle, that thing can deny all radar echoes from the target. But if we would create the aircraft, what body is pulling electrons in it, and then conduct those electrons in the electrodes or batteries, that makes it possible to make the aircraft, what doesn't need the normal fuel at all. The jet engines or rockets can use every kind of material as the propellant if it can vaporize that material. 

And that means that this kind of aircraft would create the electric arc, what it needs to vaporize the propellant. When we are thinking about the electric-arc based engine, the system can load the electricity for the system by conducting protons or some metal to the electric wire, and then pull the electricity to the batteries or some other capacitors of the system. 

Sources:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of