Theories are tools for scientists

Theories are tools for scientists

Higher accuracy with more effective tools is allowing scientists to create new theories. 

When we are talking about theories we forget, that they are tools for scientists. Every single truth in the world of science has been theory until it has been proven true. Sometimes the researchers are blamed that they are too materialistic. And do you know why researchers are what they are? The material is nice and easy to model, and there are no surprises in the world of material. 

So at this time, we are not talking about the purpose of life. We are talking about things like the oscillation of quarks, and how they interacting together. Or rather saying here I'm talking about theories, what are trying to explain and model that kind of thing. 

Today we must confess something, and that thing is that we ever can create the final theory of something. When we are making the work of science that thing is like making the puzzle, where some pieces are forming by the sub- or smaller pieces. When we are thinking that everything is done, and it's time to put the last piece in the place, we are facing the fact, that there is always a small piece, what is missing. 

That means that every time we are facing the thing that doesn't fit entirety. There is no theory, that can explain everything. At this point, we are talking about the materialistic universe, where everything is simple and easy to prove and see. If we are trying to make a calculation, what are concerning the other dimensions, we can think that the thing would be happening by increasing the imaginary parts to the complex numbers, but how to model that thing for people is difficult. 

And we cannot ever prove those calculations, because if we want to make the proof test, we must go in the other dimensions. That means we cannot imagine anything, that we haven't seen. 

But when we are thinking about things like Newtonian gravity laws, Einstein's "Theory of special relativity"  and "Theory of common relativity", we are seeing that black holes don't fit that theory. Einstein's theories were not broken Newtonian physics, they just explained the things, that were not involved in Newtonian dynamics. They explained the nature of light and space-time. Newtonian dynamics are very good tools for the cases, like common metering and the common universe. 

They are handling the interactions with planets and stars. We ever speak that Newton used the theories, what were made by Johannes Kepler and other astronomers as to the base when he made his theories of thermodynamics. But when we are starting to think about the relationship and interactions between the smaller particles, we need other theories, that have greater accuracy. 

And things like M-theory(1) are created to explain the role of the black holes and dimensions in the universe. That kind of theory has an origin as the "Superstring-theory" (2) and they are conducting from Newtonian and Einstein's theories. The "Superstring theory" is an attempt to explain all of the particles and fundamental forces of nature in one theory by modeling them as vibrations of tiny supersymmetric strings. But then we must realize, that things like superstring theories cannot explain everything. The idea of quantum physics is to explain the relationships of the smallest possible particles. 

When we are thinking about things like "Higgs boson", we are facing that that this strange subatomic particle is existing only in the extremely high energy level. So is the Higgs boson only one of the many substances of the quark? That would mean that the quark is chancing its substance all the time, while it would jump to higher energy levels. 

From Einstein to M-theory is the road, what we couldn't imagine, even history has shown that the worldview has been changed all the time, and the road from Newton to Einstein has been a very long. But there is one thing, what we ever noticed, or there are no discussions about that kind of topic. The data handling tools like computers are more advanced in the modern era than in Einsteins lifetime. And Einstein had far better tools than Isaac Newton had to prove his calculations.

 But there is one remarkable thing in the history of science, and that is when we are thinking that we are found the final theory, that would just create a series of new theories. That means we would not ever create a final theory, because the accuracy of the modern calculating tools is so good, that there are always small errors in the old theories. But if we are willing to prove some theories true or false, we have a more effective tool than ever, and that thing is artificial intelligence. 

That thing allows us to observe many objects at the same time, what would allow combining the high-accurate observations with the observations, what are concerning the large but distant entireties. And this means that while the telescope is searching exoplanets around some star, it can also search the movements and changes of the brightness of the stars that are seeing backward of the images. 

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-theory

(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory

https://futurism.com/string-theory-foundation-quantum-mechanics

Image: https://scx2.b-cdn.net/gfx/news/hires/2014/stringfieldt.jpg