Skip to main content

The militarization of space is one of the biggest problems in the world.

.

 Image furnished by NASA


The militarization of space is one of the biggest problems in the world.


The militarization of space doesn't mean some intelligence or recon satellites. I mean the killer satellites like microwave weapons, what are put in the orbital trajectory. The problem is that every nation in the world wants to affect the predicted enemy's recon satellites, what mission is to target the opponent's military (and other vital targets).

The modern recon satellites can send the GPS (or GLONASS)-coordinates for the smart weapons. The use of GPS-guided weapons is the militarization of space. The GPS-guided weapons are making the GPS-satellites good targets for killer-satellites because that denies using those things.

And they can drop the small quadcopters through the atmosphere for recon and pointing missions to the areas. This kind of quadcopters what can send intensive data of target location, or can those drones what can be controlled through satellites can be armed with a pistol- or rifle caliber weapons makes those satellites dangerous for every person on the ground. Modern technology makes many things different than ever before, and one of them is a killer satellite.

As I just wrote satellites can drop armed drones through the air, and that means that even if their laser- or other systems are not powerful enough to harm people they can be dangerous otherwise. Another thing is that activist groups, what are acting against those weapons are an easy punch by arguments that they are acting for some foreign military intelligence, and the other thing is that those people do not understand that those weapons are under development in many other countries like in China and Russia. So the USA is not only a nation, what develop satellite control weapons.

The drone swarms are arguments that they are not weapons of mass destruction. I disagree with that opinion. Drone swarms can use as the mass-destruction weapon as well as nuclear weapons or the mass-bombardment. The drones are equipped with FAE-explosives that can be delivered to the area. And then the quadcopters are making the square where the cover of the explosion is best. Then those weapons will explode at the same time.

Those drone swarms can shoot to the operational area by cargo rocket, and that means the technology is required for those drone swarm is not so accurate as in nuclear weapons. The drones can use GPS for taking their place, and the fact is that the controlling unit requires the location of the target. Then the drones can send thereby using the cargo rocket, and then their heat shields are released. Those FAE-quadcopters are the "yellow weapons". They are between conventional weapons and nuclear weapons. They are legal but mass use of them makes them the WMD (Weapon of mass destruction), which is prohibited.

The thing is that also mass-bombardment by using smart or "dumb" weapons is also mass-destruction, and smart weapons like GBU-31 JDAM can use as the mass-bombardment as well as the "surgical strikes". In mass bombardment, every single house target for those weapons. And the fact is that destroying 1000 houses require 1000 GPS guided bombs. So the large areas of the city can also destroy by using those smart weapons.

This kind of system is under development and the arguments against them are swept off by arguments those arguments is given only the army personnel, who are losing their jobs. But the real thing is that those drones can also low the risk of solving political conflicts by using military force. And in this case, the war is murder.

Image: https://sociable.co/technology/beijing-moscow-weaponized-space-through-killer-satellites-directed-energy-weapons-defense-sec/


https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/04/the-militarization-of-space-is-one-of-the-biggest-problems-in-the-world/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them? Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country. The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is ...

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots.

 Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots. "A DNAzyme (red) uses its binding arms to dock at a specific location on an RNA strand (yellow) and then cleaves it at its core. High-resolution, real-time NMR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, and Fluorescence Spectroscopy." "As well as Molecular Dynamics Simulations are used to identify the structure. And catalytic mechanisms of the DNAzyme. Credit: HHU/Manuel Etzkorn" (https://scitechdaily.com/dnazymes-how-active-dna-biocatalysts-that-destroy-unwanted-rna-molecules-work/) The active DNA catalysts are the gate to DNA-controlled, independently-operating, molecular-size nanomachines.  The DNAzymes or active DNA biocatalysts are next-generation tools for destroying unwanted RNA. The DNA molecule is one of the tools. That can use for controlling molecular-size machines. DNA is like a chemical computer program. And if the researchers can make synthetic DNA that can make exactly what the...