Could the object move back and forth even in the black hole?

Image I

Could the object move back and forth even in the black hole?

The animation in this text (Image II) shows, how the material behaves in the black hole. But in some theoretical ideas introduced the possibility that the spacecraft can fly past the center of the singularity. And if that thing is possible the object can go back and forth inside the singularity. But as you know that this thing is the only hypothesis, and it bases that in every other ball-shaped structure the object is moving back and forth. So why they don't do that in the singularity?

The black hole is the most powerful object in the universe. And that thing makes it interesting. The thing that happens behind the event horizon, the point where escaping velocity reaches the speed of the light is a mystery because we cannot get any observations behind that point. But as we know, the natural laws are staying also behind the event horizon including time dilation. When escaping velocity reaches the speed of the light the time stops.

The speed of the light is the culmination point for the time. Because time dilation is directly proportional to the escaping velocity, time travels backward behind the event horizon. So when the escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of the light the time will start to travel backward. And if the gravity field is affecting behind the event horizon as it affects in the other ball-shaped structures that thing would make it possible that the object will behave in the event horizon as it behaves in the moon.

If we will dig the tunnel through the moon, and drop the item in it, that thing will start to drop through the tunnel. Then the object will start to drop back into that tunnel. So the object moves back and forth in the tunnel, which has dug through the planet. And that means the particle should move also back and forth inside the event horizon. We have no benefit for that project.

Image II

And that is the reason why we haven't dig a tunnel through the moon. So that tunnel doesn't decrease the needed mass of the fuel. But the interesting thing is that if the jet of the rocket will point in the event horizon, that thing would pull the particles in it with the speed of the escaping velocity. Particles also drop to the center of the gravity field and if we would try to use this thing for spaceflight. The gravity field on another side of the tunnel will neutralize the effect of the gravity acceleration.

But the thing that makes that effect interesting is that theoretically possible to shoot a rocket through the black hole. That means that the rocket will shoot in singularity, and the speed of it would increase at a very high level because the jet of the rocket will accelerate inside the event horizon. The silly idea is that when the rocket will drop in the black hole, it would just drop through the singularity or the area behind the event horizon.

Then the rocket jet will aim to the center of the singularity, and then the rocket should come out from another side of the event horizon. The thing that makes this kind of hypothesis interesting is that time is moving backward in the black hole. And that thing makes it possible to travel in time. But the thing, that makes this kind of attempt to travel in time very dangerous is that the black holes are very far away from earth. The closest known black hole is 3500 lightyears away from the Earth, and the size of that black hole is not very big. Otherwise, the rocket can scratch in pieces or burn in the transition disk before it even reaches the event horizon.

Image I: https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/swift-maps-a-stars-death-spiral-into-a-black-hole/

Image II: https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/05/11/how-close-to-earth-is-the-closest-black-hole/?sh=4cb42824e9f9

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/28/could-the-object-move-back-and-forth-even-in-the-black-hole/

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog