What if there is no dark matter at all, asks new research?

What if there is no dark matter at all, asks new research?

The new research is introducing the hypothesis that dark matter doesn't exist at all. And the new MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) is supporting that thing. The MOND has passed many critical tests, so what if the dark matter doesn't exist at all? So then we might ask, where 95% of the universe is lost if there is no dark matter?

The fact is that before we are thinking that the dark matter has existed or it does not exist, we might ask the person who says that describes, what is the material? Is the graviton material? If we are thinking that the small particles, theoretical gravitons are transferring the gravity, we might ask is graviton the material or is it wave movement? And can we call wave movement as material?

Are four fundamental interactions or they transmitting particles material or wave movement?

The photons are transmitting the electromagnetism. And should we call electromagnetism the material or wave movement? The same question we can ask at the point of every four fundamental interactions? Are those interactions wave movement or are they material?

The thing that makes this question interesting is that every fundamental interaction has a transmitting particle. Three of them are confirmed. And graviton remains hypothetical. So the question is can graviton be the small black hole, which is formed by over-energetic electrons? In that case, the energy load will turn the electron into a quantum black hole. If that thing is possible that means that there is no radiation from those black holes that are "eating photons".

Is graviton only the small, quantum-size black hole?

Image II: four fundamental interactions and their transportation particles (Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction)

And the only graviton remains hypothetical. So are the hypothetical gravitons the quantum size black holes, what are making the strings with other particles? And then use that string to pull the particles to each other. That's why the gravitation itself is also interaction. The particles would pull each of them together. And would the finding of the graviton make the great unified theory proven?

Are things like WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) the thing that can explain the gravity effect of the dark matter? Or maybe that dark matter is the stopped photons, electrons, or quarks, what cannot form the other particles like neutrons and protons? Or is our universe heavier than we expected because the Big Bang was more powerful than we ever imagine? And if we are thinking about the form of the Big Bang there is detail, what can explain the dark matter.

What if a large part of the material, that released from the Big Bang dropped back to black holes? In this theory just after the Big Bang formed a large number of black holes, what pulled a large mass of material inside them? That means that near the center of the universe would be hypothetical hyper massive black holes, which can pull entire galaxies in them. The size of the singularities of the hyper massive black holes could be larger than galaxies.

And maybe a large number of the mass is stored in black holes, which are invisible to us because they are locating in the space bubbles, where is no material at all. Or there is the possibility that the lost material in the universe is hiding in the wormholes. The energy tunnels through space and time. Or maybe we just know gravity itself so little, that we are making mistakes with calculations.

Sources:

Fundamental interaction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

MOND: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics

WIMP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particles

What if the Dark matter doesn't exist?: https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-dark-matter-doesnt-exist-unique-prediction-of-modified-gravity-challenges-dark-matter-hypothesis/

Gluon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gluon

Photons: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

Gravitons (Hypothetical): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

W and Z bosons: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/07/what-if-there-is-no-dark-matter-at-all-asks-new-research/

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog