Can artificial intelligence have a conscience?

Can artificial intelligence have a conscience?

If a robot drinks alcohol it starts to act like a real drunken person if it has the chemical and other detectors that are confirming the thing what the robot drinks are alcohol and the module in its program that allows it to act like a drunken person. But what somebody would do with a robot, what emulates people, who drink too much alcohol? The fact is that the human-shaped robots can use also in covert operations of intelligence and law enforcement, and if they can emulate perfectly human behavior, they can work as body-doubles in undercover intelligence operations.

Can the machine intelligence have a conscience? Is it possible that the machine shames if it makes wrong things? The fact is that artificial intelligence might store things when it pushes somebody or makes something wrong. In this register, the artificial intelligence would store the cross, when it would not make things what it should.

And if that thing is possible the system might have different levels of errors or mistakes, which causes the different level marking in the register. If artificial intelligence makes mistake, what risks human life, that would cause a report and system shutdown. And here we are coming to one of the most powerful things in computer programs. The computer would not shame of what it makes, even it makes horrible mistakes.

The system acts in this case as its databases are giving orders to it. And that means that the robot can say "I'm sorry" and continue acting as before. The thing is that the robot doesn't realize what it says and what it makes. When it touches or pulls somebody, that pressure to its sensors would activate a certain part or table in the database, and then the robot just says that it's so sorry.

But the fact is that it can otherways be acting against that thing if other parts of databases are ordering it move or make something else. But what if the master orders the artificial intelligence to make a crime? The thing is that the robot should resist the orders to take a gun and rob a bank. But in this case, the robot would have the willingness to resist. And that means the robot has its willingness. If the robot would resist the orders of its master that is willingness.

So what every robot that is sold to civilians has the base program in its microchip which denies breaking the law? In that case, we must realize, that robot should have the ability to defend its master. But how far it can go? If the mission of that machine is to make everyday jobs for its human master. It should not give the merchandise, that it carries to anybody.

But what if somebody will try to just take those things from the robot or harm the robot itself? How far that kind of machine is allowed to go in that kind of cases? Or what if the robot has a so-called shadow protocol? That means that when the robot sees some armed people, who are not recognized as authorized weapon carriers, those robots can attack the person immediately if it just cuts grass.

The shadow protocol means that robots might have skills and sensors, which the owners are not known. One of the biggest differences between humans and robots is that the robot doesn't need the training. The only thing that must be done when the janitor robot is updated to the combat robot. And that thing is the USB-stick where is the new action module. If the robot has instructions that it must keep that module secret it will keep it secret. The part of programming that is covered that end-users would not know about its existence is calling as "shadow protocol".

They might have infra-red systems and sonars that existence the robot must not uncover until they are needed. The robot might have telemetry what is connecting it to the official databases, and if that robot sees firearms in the hands of people, who have not been allowed to carry them. Then that robot would start the weapon disarming process. And that kind of robot can cause a very big surprise.

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/11/can-artificial-intelligence-have-a-conscience/

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog