Was the signal from Proxima Centauri alien origin or manmade?

"Artist's conception of Proxima Centauri b as a rocky-like exoplanet, with Proxima Centauri and the Alpha Centauri binary system in the background. The actual appearance of the planet, is unknown." (Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri_b)

Was the signal from Proxima Centauri alien origin or manmade?

We don'ẗ know the answer, is the only answer what we can give. Honestly, we can say only that the mystery signal came from (the direction) of the Proxima Centauri. The link to that article is below this paragraph. And that's it. So what was the signal? In scientific magazines is told that in Australia a radio telescope captured a radio signal.

That signal is sent by used synthetic frequency and the source of that signal is unknown. So if we are calling all radio signals what origin we don't know as the "alien signals", we might be right. But then we must say that all stealth satellites and space shuttles, what is not found from the public recognition guides are "alien objects". So the term alien doesn't mean necessary other civilization.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/alien-hunters-discover-mysterious-signal-from-proxima-centauri/

"Certainly there are no alien civilizations" is a mantra that is repeated in public media. "Certainly there are no exoplanets and our solar system is unique in the universe" was the mantra that simultaneously repeated in the early 1980s. Then the first exoplanets were discovered, and recently the Proxima and Alpha Centauri got their first exoplanets. Before that, there was repeated that the double stars cannot have solar systems. The first super-earths that orbited other stars were found orbiting one pulsar, and that shows that the planets can "reborn" also in the remainings of the supernova.

It means only the unknown actor. When we are talking about "alien origin", we should describe what that term means in this time? When people are seeing the news about alien signals they always think that those terms mean some kind of extraterrestrial civilization. But if we are thinking that some of that news are jokes, which are published in magazines like Scientific American we must ask do we have the right to believe those magazines?

Are we stupid if we are believing some news, that published in respected scientific magazines? And if researchers are slaves of their scientific way to think, I must honestly ask, what they should be? Should they be some fanatics or people who are making decisions without seeing any evidence or making any kind of research with that case? I know only things, what I have read. And probably I sometimes use the keywords "alien signals", when I search the Internet. Probably there is some kind of information what we must put in the locker "garbage". But some things were published in scientific magazines.

So when somebody makes some kind of "jokes", there must be some reason for the joke. Does the purpose of the joke make everybody laugh to some SETI-researchers? Or stop funding of those projects. And where that money will put when the funding of the SETI-program is ended?

http://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2021/01/12/was-the-signal-from-proxima-centauri-alien-origin-or-manmade/

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them? Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country. The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is ...

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots.

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots. "A DNAzyme (red) uses its binding arms to dock at a specific location on an RNA strand (yellow) and then cleaves it at its core. High-resolution, real-time NMR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, and Fluorescence Spectroscopy." "As well as Molecular Dynamics Simulations are used to identify the structure. And catalytic mechanisms of the DNAzyme. Credit: HHU/Manuel Etzkorn" (https://scitechdaily.com/dnazymes-how-active-dna-biocatalysts-that-destroy-unwanted-rna-molecules-work/) The active DNA catalysts are the gate to DNA-controlled, independently-operating, molecular-size nanomachines. The DNAzymes or active DNA biocatalysts are next-generation tools for destroying unwanted RNA. The DNA molecule is one of the tools. That can use for controlling molecular-size machines. DNA is like a chemical computer program. And if the researchers can make synthetic DNA that can make exactly what the...

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog