What is the description of the universe?

What is the description of the universe?

1) We need to count everything. 

In string- or parallel universe theory is said that there 15²⁰⁰ universes in parallel, and this kind of tale is really interesting because the description of this numeric value would be interesting. So does that mean that there are 15²⁰⁰ universes what are straight contact with our universe, or would there "just" 15²⁰⁰ existing universes in the space what is called "parallel universe"?

So should we describe the term universe again? Should we describe that thing as the "reality"? And what is the reality? Is it a thing, what we can see, smell or feel? But that thing is not a full description of reality, there are also virtual things, like mathematics, what are basing the commonly accepted rules. 

If we want to prove something right or wrong in mathematics we must follow the rules, what are given to that thing. But if reality is something, what we can see, we must understand that also things and objects, what are behind the horizon or wall, are real and we can touch them or see them even they are big. 

And also mathematical formulas are real, but we can only see them. When we are looking at the paper, where those things are written we can see and touch the paper, and we understand the marks that are written in it, but we cannot ever touch the formula itself. 

At this point, we must realize that we cannot prove everything by using mathematics. There are always people, who are repeating "make me the formula", and that thing is sometimes very painful. In cosmology is realized that sometimes making the mathematical formula or model for some things is impossible.

2) What is the difference between theory and scientifically proven things?

In the science the accepted method to prove things is making the empiric research. Empiricism in science means that theory would be proven to right and wrong by making a series of tests, and then those tests, what are made in the different places would prove that theory is proven right and wrong. 

And then there is the possibility that the "Black Swan" the unpredictable but possible effect would be targeted to the test laboratory. The modern version of this scenario is that the GRB (Gamma-Ray Burst) would hit the particle accelerator during the test, and give the extremely powerful system more energy. That thing would mean that one result of the test series would be got more energy than others, and that thing gives a unique but different result than others. This kind of case can be translated as an error in the system. 

But that means that there is a possibility that some phenomenon exists and we are making a mistake because there is something unpredictable happened in the laboratory. There are millions of versions of this tale, and one is "what if we would load the capacitor more five minutes"?. Maybe that would give enough power for some reaction. 

2.1) How to prove theories right or wrong?

At first is a hypothesis, the thing that is taken to a closer look, and then that hypothesis would turn to theory. During that sequence, the needed formulas and other test equipment would be created. And here I must remember that also failed theories are proven. They are failed theories, and the hypothesis could also be wrong. 

1) Hypothesis

2) Theory

3) Conjecture

4) The theory is proven right or wrong

The road to from hypothesis to theory and scientifically proven thing is always the same. At first, somebody introduces a hypothesis, then that hypothesis would be transformed into theory. And theory would turn to scientifically proven or failed thing, by the test sequence, what is called conjectures, the series of tests what are proven theories right or wrong.

3) If some theory would be proven right or wrong it would not change a single thing in everyday life. (Riemann "Zeta-function" again)

So if we are thinking about reality the thing is that some virtual things have a very big mean. And one of those things is Riemann "Zeta-function"(1), which is needed to calculate the prime numbers for computer base encryption. 

So this thing is the heart of science. There are billions of theories, which have a very very big effect on everyday life, and we ever speak or mention of those things. Many people don't even know, what is Riemann "Zeta-function". That function is in a key role in the computer-based encrypting algorithms. 

If there are zero points in some part of that graph curve in that function, that would mean that the series of the prime numbers, what this function creates ends. So that thing might seem aimless because there are millions of base numbers in the number line of prime numbers. But if we would someday create the quantum computer, that system could simply undergo every prime number, and then all messages can be open. 

Or could we open those messages by using the quantum computer? In this hypothesis, I will suppose that the only secrecy method, what is used is the algorithm that uses Riemann "Zeta-function" for making prime numbers, which is used for multiplicating the ASCII-codes. So could that kind of secrecy so easy to break?  

The thing is that if there is only one zero-point in the Riemann's "Zeta-function", the encrypting program can get the order that "do not use calculation number X (X is where the zero points are). So, in this case, the encryption program would not use quantum decimal prime numbers, and it uses only the integer-mode prime numbers. 

There are many ways to make encryption stronger, like using a series of prime numbers or decimal quantum prime numbers, where are billions of numbers behind the decimal point. And that thing makes those encryptions harder to break. 

(1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_zeta_function

Image: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Atomium_Belgium_1.jpg