Skip to main content

Difference between normal and philosophical way to think





Difference between normal and philosophical way to think

The philosophical writing can handle almost everything. Sometimes people might laugh when I write about plastic bites and other things, which might look very common, but somehow I always find something, that I may be supposed not to find. But don't worry the most well-known philosophical problem is handling thing, what is one of the most common in the world. That thing is a glass of water. The problem or an example goes that when the professor comes in the lecture hall, that person always puts the glass of water on the table.

What is the difference between the everyday way to think and a philosophical way of thinking? Everyday thinking is that there is a glass of water. And the philosophical way to think about this kind of thing is because there is a glass of water, we might ask why there is a glass of water? Or what happens if there is no glass of water? Is there some kind of deeper meaning about that kind of glass? The thing in a philosophical way to think is that the idea is to find the deeper essence of the things, what is looking like easy. And the questions what should do with philosophical writings and other things is to make three questions about the thing, what is under the supervision.

1) What is the thing?

2) Why the thing is where it is? Or why that thing is so interesting?

3) Why does it look like something?


In this writing, we might see the plastic bag. So we might notice that thing is a plastic bag, and nothing is interesting about that thing. But what if that plastic bag is on the table of some table? Did somebody left it there in purpose, or why that thing was not taken to the garbage? Was the purpose to give that plastic bag to somebody else?

And here we might realize, that the thing is that there might come personnel of the staff, and at least remark of that kind of garbage. So the thing why the plastic bag is looking like something is the bag can be identified, but this example is meant to show, how the deeper way to think might uncover something very interesting in the everyday life. This is why some people in ancient Greece started to think things, like the deepest form of the material.

They made an idea that there is somewhere deep inside the atomic structure is the "Atmos", a particle that we cannot dismantle. The same way we can think things like states. Sooner or later we would face the end of the line,  of people who are the leaders. And then we are facing the person, who is the top leader. So those philosophers thought that "atmos "existed.

There must be the final form of material, which cannot be section anymore. But we are not found that final particle yet. The researchers are finding smaller and smaller particles inside the quarks. But they cannot find the "atmos". That thing is the gate between the wave movement and material. But we will always find another and another particle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of