Skip to main content

Difference between normal and philosophical way to think





Difference between normal and philosophical way to think

The philosophical writing can handle almost everything. Sometimes people might laugh when I write about plastic bites and other things, which might look very common, but somehow I always find something, that I may be supposed not to find. But don't worry the most well-known philosophical problem is handling thing, what is one of the most common in the world. That thing is a glass of water. The problem or an example goes that when the professor comes in the lecture hall, that person always puts the glass of water on the table.

What is the difference between the everyday way to think and a philosophical way of thinking? Everyday thinking is that there is a glass of water. And the philosophical way to think about this kind of thing is because there is a glass of water, we might ask why there is a glass of water? Or what happens if there is no glass of water? Is there some kind of deeper meaning about that kind of glass? The thing in a philosophical way to think is that the idea is to find the deeper essence of the things, what is looking like easy. And the questions what should do with philosophical writings and other things is to make three questions about the thing, what is under the supervision.

1) What is the thing?

2) Why the thing is where it is? Or why that thing is so interesting?

3) Why does it look like something?


In this writing, we might see the plastic bag. So we might notice that thing is a plastic bag, and nothing is interesting about that thing. But what if that plastic bag is on the table of some table? Did somebody left it there in purpose, or why that thing was not taken to the garbage? Was the purpose to give that plastic bag to somebody else?

And here we might realize, that the thing is that there might come personnel of the staff, and at least remark of that kind of garbage. So the thing why the plastic bag is looking like something is the bag can be identified, but this example is meant to show, how the deeper way to think might uncover something very interesting in the everyday life. This is why some people in ancient Greece started to think things, like the deepest form of the material.

They made an idea that there is somewhere deep inside the atomic structure is the "Atmos", a particle that we cannot dismantle. The same way we can think things like states. Sooner or later we would face the end of the line,  of people who are the leaders. And then we are facing the person, who is the top leader. So those philosophers thought that "atmos "existed.

There must be the final form of material, which cannot be section anymore. But we are not found that final particle yet. The researchers are finding smaller and smaller particles inside the quarks. But they cannot find the "atmos". That thing is the gate between the wave movement and material. But we will always find another and another particle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta"

    Image I The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta" Sometimes there have been discussions that the mysterious TR3A "Black Manta" was a study project for the B-2 bomber.  That means that TR3A was used as the flying mockup for testing the aerodynamic and control solutions for the B-2 "Spirit" bomber. The thing that supports this thing is that the manufacturer of both planes is Northrop corporation.  Along with "Aurora" was flying one other mysterious aircraft, TR3A "Black Manta". The system is described as the "Stealth VTOL" (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft. Unless the mysterious TR3B, the Northrop TR3A is the conventional VTOL-aircraft, what is using regular jet engines, but what has the stealth-body.  Image II The thing is that the stealth-reconnaissance aircraft, which uses a similar technology with the Northrop B-2 bomber would be an interesting part of the weapon arsenal. There is a possibility that the TR3A was...

The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like.

.     The cyborg lichen can be one of the most exotic visions of what the high-tech civilization might look like. Above is the image of the nano-submarine. There is introduced an idea, that this kind of system would equip with living neurons, which makes it like some kind of artificial bug or mosquito. The idea is that the robot can take the nutrient by using the robot tube, which acts like a proboscis. The neurons can get nutrients and the rest of the machine can use small fuel cells or the energy to that system can deliver by using the radio waves. Futurologists are thinking about the ideas, what the hybridization of the neurons and machine would look like? Could the hyper-technical civilization look like the group of midget submarines? Those submarines might take nutrients for the neurons, what is living in them. The purpose of the midget submarines, which might be size less than a couple of millimeters would maximize the survivability of the neurons. One of the most intere...

Who really was Plato, the great philosopher?

When we are thinking about the great philosopher Plato, we are thinking about the man who established the Academy of Athens. And we might remember that this man was a traveler. He traveled in many places in his life and wrote many texts and books, which still is very respected thoughts about the state and other things. When we are looking at the books or series of books, we are facing the thing, that there were lots of texts. If we want to use criticism we must notice that the model of the ideal state is rising the kings in the very high position, and the thing would flatter the kings. And sometimes I have thought that maybe that famous model of the ideal state is written by somebody else. The thing is that the model, where the philosophers rule the state behind the lines of soldiers could be written for the persons like Justinian, who was really flattered. The thing is that this kind of writings was meant for flatter the rulers, who would not persecute philosophers, even they had d...