Skip to main content

The expansion of the universe may not be the same at every place.




The expansion of the universe may not be the same at every place. 

NASA:s "Chandra"(1) telescope has been noticed that there might be differences in the expansion of the universe. If the expansion of the Universe is not the same at all places, and that could be a more important thing than researchers ever expected, and the thing is that the reason for that thing might give answers to many things like parallel universe theory to gravity waves.

In this point the "may" in the sources is a very important word. That means that there must get more data for confirming the observations, what "Chandra" has been made (2). But the confirmation of those observations will be needed. 

If the expansion speed of the universe is different in some places, that thing means that there are differences in the forces, what is affecting the star- and galaxy clusters, and that means that there is something, what has so big force, that it can affect to entire galaxies and universe. There are two things, which can cause that effect. 

There are two possible sources to that effect, what can be the revolution in the history of science. That variety of the speed of expansion of the universe needs an extremely high level of energy, and even the largest supermassive black holes cannot make that thing. So this effect can give the possibility to research the gravity and the possibility to find gravitons(2), the hypothetical transportation particles of the gravity. 

1) The internal force 

The internal force causes the thing, what "Chandra" telescope has been noticed, the reason could be the most enormous black hole, what we can ever imagine. That black hole would be in the middle of the universe, and it would be the remaining of the Big Bang if that thing exists. 

Of course, the formation of the "normal" supermassive black holes can cause that thing. But that means that there would be the clumps of those black holes in the universe, which causes the differences in the effect of gravity on certain areas and that causes those variables, what "Chandra" has been noticed. 

If the thing that causes the asymmetry is coming inside the reason for that could be the gravity waves. The reason for that is that researchers should see things like ions or microwaves if they are causing this kind of asymmetry, but if the reason for that is the microwaves are causing the effect, what is the variable speed of expansion that force must be enormous. 

So is there the enormous black hole in the center of the universe. Some kind of remaining of the Big Bang? The thing is that if the gravity waves would cause that asymmetry in the expansion of the universe that means that the expansion could not (probably) happen at the same speed all the time. 

The reason for that is that only the colliding black holes can send the gravity waves, which can be metered. So if the reason for the thing that the expanding of the universe is an internal force, what is the gravity waves and the expansion happens with the stable speed there is something that sends those gravity waves all the time. 

2)  The external force

The external force causes the thing, what "Chandra" has been noticed, and that external force could be the hyper-massive object, what is outside our universe. So could there be another universe, and if we could see that thing, this would prove parallel universe theory possible. 

And maybe that thing would answer, why we cannot see other universes if they exist. The problem of the multiverse- or parallel universe theory is that there should be observations about other universes, but we cannot get any observations from them. 

That means that sometimes have been introduced an idea, that universe itself would be like some giant black hole, and photons would not able to leave that thing. The conclusion is that there must be some kind of force, which causes that vary in the expansion speed. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of