Skip to main content

Why the Boltzmann brain suddenly interest some people?






Why the Boltzmann brain suddenly interest some people?

We might describe "Boltzmann brain" as spontaneously forming knowledge and consciousness. So can somebody make the Boltzmann brains by adjusting the experiences, what the person faces? Can the Boltzmann's brain formed by making artificial memories or removing some other memories? Memories are things, that is making our feelings, and they have a strong connection in our motivation. And if we are thinking things like artificial intelligence the motive is in a very important role in that process. 

Programming is a very accurate work. One missed mark would cause that the program would not work, even there are billions of marks. And that means that the programmer must have great professional skills but also very high motivation for making the code, what is used in those algorithms. People who are making that kind of work require high morale because of those applications can be used way wrong. They can be used to remove the privacy of the people, and this kind of thing can be used for good and bad. 

The tracking tool can be used by law enforcement and rescue service for tracking "bad boys" or people, who are in trouble, but how we will describe who are "bad boys"? Are they some drug dealers or are they members of political opposition? 

If we are thinking about the artificial brains we are forgetting that even the most advanced brains in the world are useless, if they don't have any memories. Memories are things, which are consisting of all data that is stored in brains. So brains are not only the cells or neural structures. They are also experiences and feelings. And the experiences are things, which have very strong connections with feelings. 

And data, what is stored in our brains is consisting of our education and other experiences in our history. This term "other experiences" is the thing, that sometimes causes an "interesting reaction", because if the success of some person's work depending on the own will of those people, that means that the experiences of those people are in the key role for motivation in their work. 

This thing is always a problem in scientific work. When we are thinking about the "Manhattan project", the creation of the atom bomb during the Second World War, in the key role in that project were working people, who were born in Europe, and some of them made that bomb because they wanted to take revenge for Nazis and Fascists. The reason for that was sometimes that they were violated in Italy and Germany. 

That means that those people wanted to work for the Allied side. The thing, why nuclear bombs might be leak also to USSR could be caused that somebody in the "Manhattan project" afraid that the USA would become a new Nazi-Germany. The truth was that there were many social and ethnic problems in that country and the race separation was very common in that country, especially in the southern states. And the things like Anti-communist movement and Ku Klux Klan caused that some people would give the nuclear secrets to the Soviet Intelligence. 

But sometimes some people asked the famous question "what if?". What if those bad experiences in social life did not happen? Would Enrico Fermi move to the USA and made the first nuclear reactor in that place? And would Kurt Godel move to the USA, if the "Nazi patrol" wouldn't attack that man in one evening? 

The lack of mathematicians caused that German Artillery didn't get the tracking tables for their cannons, and that thing made the impossible to make very accurate cannons. The problem with mathematics is that nothing in that world is pretentious. Those people are making computers and calculation formulas, but that is the work that happens in the back office, and that means that there are so little things to portrait in public media. 

But the work of those people depending on their own will. So what if we would create artificial experiences for the people, or what if we can remove some experiences, what happens in the history of that person, what thing that thing mean? That thing could give an extremely powerful tool for some people, who want some men or women are supporting their will. The thing is that if we are thinking about the "Orwell-application" the computer program or algorithm, what can track people, or remove their entire privacy, the will to make that thing depends on the computer programmers. 

If the programmer doesn't want to make those applications, they have not existed. But the thing is that the programmer needs will to make those things. There is a possibility, that some experience in the past would motivate the programmer to make applications, which are supporting people like Vladimir Putin. But also things like regular law enforcement are depending on the experiences, what people have faced. 

What would motivate people better than an attack on the school road? And what if those people who made that attack will release because tracking of people by using DNA or mobile data is prohibited? Would that thing make enough motivation for people who would make the tracking tools? Think about this, before you justify other people. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of