How to make artificial planet? (In theory, of course)

How to make artificial planet? (In theory, of course)

If mankind would someday create an artificial planet, what would replace the Earth, must there be some very good reason for that. And the reason can be that the Sun is starting to transforming to red giant star. That would be the end of our civilization and life on Earth if we would not move to another planet.

The problem of the suitable planets and particles is that the only planet in our solar system, what would look like Earth is Venus, what is nearer the Sun than Earth. So this planet would not give very much help when the Sun is starting to grow. Of course, there are moons, what has a rocky surface on the solar system, but the problem is that the gravity of those moons is very weak. And they cannot maintain the atmosphere.

For the answer to that problem is introduced that all the surface of the moon would be covered by a giant glass- or metal layer, and people would live in this structure. But if we would want to live in the normal gravity, where mankind has been living all of its existence, and where we have adjusted, we would need brand new Earth, and one thing, what we could do is create brand new Earth for our species.

If we would want to create an artificial planet, we must find interplanetary nebula, which involves the right elements. And then we must bring one heavier particle inside it, and then the gravity would pull the nebula on this particle and the process would take billions of years. 

But there would be another version, what would take a little bit shorter time, and in this version, we must have two interplanetary nebulas, what we would load with the opposite polarity of electricity. Of course, those interplanetary nebulas must be in the right distance, that the electromagnetic forces can pull them together.

Then inside another nebula would be stationed one heavier particle, what would help the creation of that artificial planet, and putting it in the right position. This idea has been taken from the YouTube channel, "what if", and the thing is that this kind of extraordinary ideas have been introduced sometimes before that, and the idea of the artificial planet is very fascinating.

This extremely large project has created the idea from the observation, that the water layer on the planet would make it colder. And then some astronomers calculated, that even planet Earth is not exactly in the living sphere near Sun. But the large water areas on the surface keep our home planet cooler. Also, the cloud layer and the gasses that are found in the atmosphere are important for the temperature of the planet.

And that have given ideas that if we would create the artificial planet, we could adjust its temperature by selecting the mixture of gasses and the area of the water layer on its core. The idea is very futuristic, but the thing is fascinating. Sometimes there has been introduced ideas that the new Earth would be created in the Asteroid belt when the sun is starting to transform into a red giant star and turns brighter. This transformation would cause the burn of life on our planet.

The new Earth would be made by using some big asteroid like Ceres. The asteroid would be covered with big and powerful magnets, and then the rest of the sand of the asteroid belt will be magnetized with the opposite polarity of electricity, what can deliver by using giant radio telescopes. 

In this idea, the asteroid would pull those particles on its surface. Then the water and other things would bring to that planet from Europe moon of Jupiter, and Oort cloud. The consumption of the atmosphere would be adjusting with carbon dioxide and other gasses like ozone that it can maintain life, what is brought from the Earth.

Maybe this thing would save our species and give it more time to move to other stars, but this thing would be far away in the future. But this technology would give the change to the human race to survive after the Sun is turned to the white dwarf and there is the only cold and dark area around it. This is the moment when mankind mus, at last, find a new home.

The hidden lie detectors can uncover our dirtiest secrets.

The hidden lie detectors can uncover our dirtiest secrets.

The book, what reads your mind could be a very interesting topic for the horror movie, but this kind of things can turn real. The idea is that the merchandise would be covered with electric sensors, what is detecting the electric vortex in people nervous system, and then the transmitter would send that EEG to the Internet.

The same way we could make a computer, what would sen the information of our neurological operands to the cloud, and this kind of data would allow mapping, what kind of things are interesting us, or what feel us scary. The thing is that the system would notice, what kind of movies or trailers the person watches, and then it can notice some other things like are the sounds off, and how fast would the person scroll that movie?

That would be connected to the neurological actions of the targeted person, and those actions would make possible to make the map about the things, what inmate feels uncomfortable, scary or comfortable. The system detects the transforms of the blood pressure, pulse, way to push the buttons, and the neurological actions.

Also, the system can detect is the person watching the movie or does that inmate go to the freezer? That data would be connected to a certain part of the movie and this would help to create a profile of the targeted individual. If somebody wants to smoke that person out from some house, the system can use that data, what is collected from the hidden lie detectors to create psycho-effects. Those effects can make real by using holographic systems and loudspeakers. And they might be really scary because they benefit persons own subconscious, which makes them effective.

The problem with innovation is similar to some festivals

The problem with innovation is similar to some festivals

There are problems with the festivals, that some artist, who will come to perform would need money to continue the career. And the thing in those cases is, that if the festival is a so-called profitable case, the artists should get money about their work, which means that they should set payments, what artist must do when the perform is practicing. And in all cases even in the non-profitable festivals, the costs of the artist should be paid.

This is a very complicated thing because if some artist is just beginning actor without no name and recognizability would those people make their best in those cases? Who is the artist, who has so much name, that the inmate or band can ask big payment? And what happens, if in the front of the so-called big name is not an audience, who are coming to listen to some other artist, who might have performed to some marginal groups.

Bands and other actors what have acting long time has many types of music or art, and they might just choose wrong bites of their product for that evening. And would they perform their newest product at some festivals, what is free for everybody? The thing is that also the audience, what pays something must leave something new, and this thing is really sad. 

This same phenomenon is visible in the competitions of the best innovation in some universities and other education actors. I have sometimes thought that many of those persons, who are taking part in those happenings are not showing their best products and innovations. This thing is visible in some courses, where students must introduce some innovations.

And the thing is that many of those innovations are very conventional. Being braver those innovations can be more interesting and in those cases is no shame to be different. The difference is the thing, what makes those competitors colorful, interesting and revolutionary. Of course, they could be good, but if the team would use bravery and imagination, the result could be fascinating and effervescent, what brings notice to those products. And of course, the feedback is a very important thing in forming the product.

They are afraid that somebody will steal those ideas, and that means that they would be far better, than what those magnificent demonstrations have been. Those happenings are a good place to perform their ideas and I have not seen any bad work in those happenings. But when we are thinking those cases like innovation fairs, they are places, where companies and teams are like rockstars.

The problems with robots and national security

The problems with robots and national security

On the Internet are many films about robots, which are created looking at exact humans. Those robots speak, act and look like real persons, and in some cases, those robots would be used as the spies or undercover police operators. The thing is that there is not so disgusting thing, what robots cannot do. And that makes those machines suitable tools for slipping the agent in some persons nearest social environment.

The robots can act as a spouse, but they can deliver every single bit of data, what they have collected to the command center. The thing is that the human-looking robots would have WLAN, and mobile Internet connections for making sure, that the robot would get enough assistance from the cloud computers, what mission is to help the system finish its mission with offering calculating assistance. Or in hardest cases, the human operators can solve the problem, and send the solutions straight to the hypothetical robot, what would be the remote-controlling unit or extension of the multilayer computer system.

When we are thinking the robots like "Sophia", what are the example, what happens, when artificial intelligence would connect to robot, what might in future look exactly like a human, and feel like a human, we would face the thing that this kind of devices are really good intelligence operators, because they have not feels like humans. That's why those robots are really dangerous. They can do anything for accomplishing their mission, and if this kind of robots is connected to artificial intelligence or large-scale database, what has been collected from some person, they can offer perfect satisfaction and come close of that target. 

The thing is that those robots would feel nice, they might satisfy persons deepest willings, and they can look like a human. That means that those machines can even marry their targets, and even if they are looking pretty, those robots might have hydraulic muscles and radiological weapons, which makes them dangerous. And thig, what makes them different with people, is that they cannot feel things like a human.

But they can emulate humans very well. Those robots can write diaries, and they are seeing if the person doesn't like some texts, or lies, when they are asked have they read those markings. The thing is that those diary markings would be made for flatter the target. And when the robot does something, it would not feel pain. That means when the arm is turned to a certain angle, the robot might say, that thing hurts. But the real thing is that those robots cannot feel anything.

Lack of feelings makes robots difficult to handle. If somebody would give some mission to the robot, it would do everything to make that mission accomplish. The thing is that if the robot plays some kind of spouse, it would have programmed the ghost protocol, that the targeted individual must be eliminated if that inmate would realize that the spouse is some kind of robot. And also those robots, what is created for intelligence work might be very jealous, because of another relationship would risk the mission of the machine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_(robot)

About miniaturized robots and their functions

About miniaturized robots and their functions

The thing in the modern world and computer technology is that every particle of the system must not handle every kind of operations. The problem with miniaturized nano-bugs is that their size is so small that the electric source and the data handling units are problematic to create. One solution would be the miniaturized fuel cell, which can use hydrocarbons for creating electricity.

But there is another version of that power system and that is that the quadcopters would bring the computers and the power sources to those miniature robots. One of the most unique ideas is that the quadcopters or some other helicopters would fly above the robot bugs, and pump the electricity to those small robots by using wireless electric transfer.

Also, those bigger units would communicate with miniature-drones and the controlling computers would be at those bigger drones. This thing would give a solution to the problem, how to connect the small size, good power source, and the effective operational range. If the power source would have effective output, the range of the small-sized robots would be extremely short.

This is one of the most vital problems when those robot bugs are created. The thing is that if the power source and most of the calculating functions would outsource to the bigger drones, what is flying above the small drones. Or otherways every single computer in the drone swarms can be connected to one large network-based data handling solution. This makes those robots operate autonomously and they are not addicted to long-range communication. 

But if those systems use data-connection, they can ask data-assistance from the central computers, what are locating at the other side of the Earth. Of course, that solution might be multi-cloud, where the drone-swarms are communicating together or with the control center, what might be the cloud-based solution, what connects the data, what is collected satellites and other detecting systems like ships, man-portable systems, and normal aircraft. The artificial intelligence can create the actions, what it wants those drones to do using this information, what is collected from the different places as the source.

When we are talking about nanosized robot bugs, which can act as a swarm of ants, we always forget something. Those small-size robots must not know or handle every kind of actions, and they can operate with other kinds of drones and another kind of robots and vehicles. The robot ants or spiders, how would you call those small-sized robots can have the metal bites in their back, and they can be carried from one place to another by using quadcopters, what are equipped with electric magnets, what can raise those machines above ground.

Those miniaturized robots electric sources can also be loaded by using those quadcopters, which can use wireless loading systems to those ants. The idea is that when the poly robot is created by separate particles, that structure can be intelligent and flexible.

Those small robots can be connected in one big structure, and that allows them to connect their computers. And also they can ask the calculating assistance from the quadcopters, which would resend the transmitting to communication satellites. But the ability to connect the microchips of those drones and small-size robots to operate as one very large computer makes them the ability to operate independently.

Man is looking at the bubble

Man is looking at the bubble

One question is very fascinating: could we someday create spacecraft or underwater structures by using liquid material, what can blow to the bubble form? The soapy water would be effective material in this kind of case, but the structure would be too weak to accomplish this thing.

The answer to that thing could be found from the carbon net, which would cover that bubble, and make it harder. One version is to cover the soap layer with extremely small, pyramid-shaped crystals, which would deny the collapse of the layer, and the carbon-fiber net would deny the expansion of hat bubble.  But this thing might be true just in the future.

When we see that kind of images, we might think, what the man sees in this form. The bubble seems empty, but when we are thinking that form more careful, the bubble is full of material, and if it's made by using soapy water, it is full of over-pressurized gas. The thing what makes bubble or at least symmetrical ball interesting is that it cannot push out of the form if the pressure is symmetrical.

This makes possible to create the lightweight, ball-shaped structure, what would endure in the deepest place on Earth, and also this absolute round bubble would fly in the space. This is the idea of Echo-satellite, what is absolute, ball-shaped mylar ball, what can send to Earth orbiter, but the same ball would work as an underwater structure. But let's go back to soap bubbles.

If we would be very childish, or we have a very good imagination, we could think the case, that the soap bubble would use as the structure, what covers people in the vacuum, and even against radiation. In this case, we would send the bottle of soapy water to space and then blow this bubble above it, and if the bubble is filled with hydrogen that would cover things, what is in it, from the radioactive radiation.

But as I wrote at the beginning of this text, the problem is that the soap bubble would be so weak. This kind of ideas are extremely fascinating, but they are hard to make in practical conditions. And maybe nanotechnology would make this kind of materials possible.

Children and attitudes

Children and attitudes

There is one really interesting thing about the behavior of children. People who are interesting in those things, and are advising parents, how they should grow their children are many times full of tattoos. Those people are thinking that they are really good advisors, to tell other people, how they should keep their children in strength.

Children are a very good indicator, what kind of attitudes parents have. If some person, who is under ten years is starting to wear gang clothes and play some soldier, at the home the situation is that parents are accepting and supporting that kind on advantage. In that kind of cases, parents are responsible for the advantage, what has been taken to that situation. Children are telling at schools and other places, what kind of attitudes their parents have, by using a very nasty method.

If some pupil is telling at school, that this inmate wants to be a gangster or some other pupil is telling that the aim of that person is being the member of a motorcycle gang, that thing is very interesting because in those cases somebody has told, that this kind of aims is acceptable. But when we are looking at those things a little bit closer, we are facing the delusion that some MC-gangs are controlling the society. In some publications of writings, what those persons have given in many places is stories about "the army of motorcycle men". In fact in many of that so-called "vest gangs" is militaristic strength. There might be an absolute dress code, that the person who has a certain rank in the group has the right to keep certain clothes.

As an example, black leather clothes are reserved for the bosses, and actually, those clothes are the mark of the position in the group. The worst insult, what person can make in those societies is to skip own leader and ask straight from the person, who is above own boss. In some gangs, the person, who is two-level below other members would not even get an answer, if that inmate asks the toilet or something like that.

This kind of thoughts is very interesting. Some of those persons are looking the public persons, who have visited in the "clubhouse" or headquarters of the motorcycle gangs. They are introducing wild visions, that in someday the real controller of the state is some kind of MC-gang, and in some other stories, the MC-gangs have the position as the official law enforcement.

Some people are writing about this kind of things, and if we would see the entirety of those people social community, they would have only bikers in their social environment. In those cases, those people might not even know others than some gang-members. And in those cases, that kind of things are very well seen in writings, what the journalist makes.

The story of abilities of aerogel and nanomachines.

The story of abilities of aerogel and nanomachines. 

The lightest solid material on Earth is aerogel, which was invented in 1931. The material is very well known, and there is one question, and that is why Lawrence Livermore laboratories stamped this "solid smoke" top secret? There is one thing, what might answer that question. The thing is that aerogel is fibered silicon dioxide, and the version, what Lawrence Livermore laboratories created might base the carbon fiber.

Even if the aerogel is damaged, when it would be contacted with water, there are many usages for that kind of material. And the varnish or some polymer would keep the aerogel dry if that layer will repel water. And another version of that could be that the outer layer would use the nanotechnology, what is emulating the hair of otter, and that thing denies the water touch with aerogel.

The carbon-fiber structure would, in theory, give the carbon-based aerogel the quality, that the fibers operate like nanomachines. In this theoretical material, the carbon fibers could be like springs, what would remember their trajectory, if they will cut, and then those fibers can return to form. And this makes possible to create the layer, what fixes itself.

So the aerogel is a bright, light and flexible material, which is quite hard. There is one thing, what might make it interesting. That is the ability to use aerogel as the structure of aircraft and space vehicles.

The lightweight structure would make possible to send the heavier cargo to space. And if the aerogel can store information in the chemical computer program would that make a revolution in the material research and developing new kind of machines, what can change their form. 

The thing is that the DNA molecule would act as a chemical computer program. And if there would be multiple DNA molecules like tracks, the central computer of the craft can choose, what line would the enzyme choose, and that thing allows to choose the form of the craft. That thing would make possible to create a craft, which is like a living organism.

Or in some wildest theories, those carbon fibers could involve artificial DNA, which allows the craft to survive many situations. This kind of things are of course fully hypothetical versions of aerogel, and maybe they can be created sometimes in tomorrow. But if the layer of the spacecraft would be made by using artificial DNA, the craft can create a copy of itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerogel

The good thing in the asteroid incident of last Thursday was that particle didn't hit to Earth

The good thing in the asteroid incident of last Thursday was that particle didn't hit to Earth

Last Thursday the asteroid, what size was about 45 meters passed the Earth from a very short distance. That distance was very close, and the small size of the asteroid made it very difficult to locate. And this kind of situations is really scary because of those small asteroids are the majority in our solar system. And the thing, what makes those asteroids dangerous, is that their trajectory can change very soon, and even the smallest stones can make them change their direction.

The destruction, what those very small asteroids can cause is quite small if we think only the destruction area, but if that asteroid drops to the populated city area like London, the number of casualties might be very high. And this makes those small particles scary. When we are thinking about the way to avoid impact, the safest method would be to turn those asteroids to another trajectory, and that seems a very good way.

But the problem is that if we would choose the wrong trajectory, that asteroid can hit to Ceres or some other big asteroid. Or it can start to travel with spiral trajectory, and in the worst case that trajectory would be the same with Earth, but in the opposite direction, and in that case the situation would be very dangerous. There is a possibility, that the asteroid would be closing Earth from the direction of Sun, it can come very close until it can be located. And in those cases, the nuclear explosion would be the only way to avoid impact.

The asteroid can shoot the kinetic energy warheads, what would break it to smaller particles, but if there would be the only couple of hours, the nuclear blast would be an only effective choice. The use of high-yield thermonuclear weapon could steam entire asteroid, but the EMP-pulse and radioactive fallout would be devastating. Another way to handle big asteroids is detonated series of small neutron bombs on the same side and point on the asteroid, and if there is water under the core, the steam can turn the trajectory to another way. 

Or that particle can be pushed by the rocket stage, what has feet on the nose, and that thrust can push the asteroid, what is about 500 meters away from the planet Earth. But the turning must begin early enough, that the rockets would affect. And if the speed of asteroid is too high, the pulling can happen too slow. The problem of that project is that Earth is quite a big particle and it can pull asteroid to the impact course, even the pushing would first seem effective.

If we would crush the asteroid by using nuclear weapons, the result could be that we would face the swarm of the meteors, what are the size of 50 meters, and we would not have time to locate every stone bite on that cloud. And when those particles will drop, the forests and cities start to burn. The result could be the nuclear winter, or global winter, where most parts of our ecosystem will suffer. And the new ice-age will be the thing, what mankind will face. Maybe the reason for the ice-ages were smaller meteorites, what hit on Earth.

Those meteorites were not so big, as the meteorite, what destroyed dinosaurs, but they caused the dropping of the global temperature. And when we are looking at the evidence of that catastrophe, the thing, what supports that theory are the puppies of Mammoths and other animals. A large number of very remains of very small animals, which are found from Northern Russia are telling, that the ice-ages were begun in the middle of the summer, and the temperature decreased very fast. And maybe in somewhere the meteorite hit on Earth, and caused that catastrophe.

Design is a very interesting and important thing

Design is a very interesting and important thing

When we are looking at products, we must realize, that the form of the thing is not the same. Forming thing is important hammock is the case is depending on the toothbrush or some cars. If we think that we would wash our dishes by using the straight brush, where is smooth handgrip, that experience would be very awful, because the hand is slipping on the grip.

The straight form forces to turn the dish brush, and only the top of the brush would touch the dishes. Then one German designer created the dish brush, where are a curve and the grip is roughen, because of the better touch. That brush has been sold over 60 million.

Curved rod makes easier to control brushes. And that thing is really important because the same method is used in the toothbrush, that they could clean even the last teeth, and the roughen grip would make them nicer to keep in hand because the toothbrush what rod is roughened doesn't slip. As in those examples is visible, even the smallest products must be designed well. 

What would you feel, if you must wash your dishes or teeth by using a bad brush? Would it feel nice, if the brush would slip all the time or the touch to the rod must be so hard, that muscles of the fingers would be ill? Maybe normal people would not care about this kind of things, but there is a couple of firms, what are manufacturing dish- and toothbrushes. And those firms might be interesting, what kind of brush the customer chooses when that person goes shopping.

When people are selecting things like candies, they might look at first, what that candy looks like. And the packages are important, but also things what is inside those bags and boxes is important. That means the form of the candies and other kinds of products must be good, that people buy them. This means that the form of each product must be perfect when people are willing to choose them.

Is salary only thing, what is important in working life?

Is salary only thing, what is important in working life?

The work is good to give, but salaries are hard to pay is the rule in the working life. And this kind of things is problematic in the discussions about things, which are important in working life, and the thing is that there is one very good point in the discussions of salaries. That is, is the salary only thing, what is important in working life?

Of course, the worker needs money for living, and everybody should live by using their salaries, without need to ask money from the government and social authorities, and this is the paradox of salaries. If salaries are really low, people need social security for a living, and that would cost money for the government and taxpayers.

But if the salaries are too high, that thing can cause the price of food and other services would be getting high. And that thing is very problematic because too high salaries would cause the people, who get poor salary are driven crammer than ever before, and that kind of things can cause more costs for society than we even expected.

Rising numbers of criminal activities would cause that we should hire more law enforcement and prison guards. And there is a possibility that some of the stealings are not ever solved. The main number of the costs of criminal activities are forming from small crimes.

Those cases where a person steals merchandise, what value is less than 50 euros happens all the time and the thing what makes them very tedious is that they are done very often, and even if one thief would not steal lots of merchandises. In many cases the value of the stolen property is under 5 (Five) Euros, the financial loss of the shop will be very high. 

If a thousand people steal the candy or can of beer, what value is about 2 euros, that will cost 2000 euros for the shop. And if that happens every month, that would cost 24 000 euros for that shop. And that loss must take from somewhere. That kind of stealings cause that the shop must hire guards, and this means that these kinds of costs must transfer to somewhere, and that means that the prices will start to rise.

Sometimes any of the thieves would be caught. This kind of stealings happens, when people don't care about their fate in the court system, and anyway, the person who steals property would not need to replace things, what other people have done, and maybe that kind of losses would not ever be replaced. If the salary is poor, and people would not live with money, what they earn, that thing raises the number of the stealings of low-price products. Ans many of those thieves are ever caught.

Why being so serious?

THE MATERIAL CANNOT REACH THE SPEED OF LIGHT BEFORE EVENT HORIZON.

Why being so serious?

We all notice, that some people have problems with discussions, and the thing, how we notice, that the person is somehow addicted to pseudoscience is that they just want to believe something. If somebody disagrees with those persons, they are always so militant, that I always have thought, that how they can live in this modern world.

They can yell and give orders all the time, and I sometimes ask, how they dare? Why they are not afraid that somebody would have different opinions about those things. So the thing is that some people would think about some questions is that they see everything black and white. There could not any other opinions or versions about the truth that what they have.

Snowball-effect is one of the most fascinating terms of sociology. The idea is that if some person is suspected of the crime, that causes every single crime in the world is made by that person. If a person steals candy from the shop, that doesn't mean that the same inmate makes murders at the same time. And the thing, what seems very interesting is that some people are losing control if some other people are suspicious about the theory of relativity and the crossing the speed of light.

In nature, there is only one exception of Einstein's theory of relativity, and that thing exists only behind the event horizon of the black hole. In the point of an event horizon, the particle would reach the point, where even the light cannot escape. That means that there is a possibility, that the speed of light would be crossed behind an event horizon.

If the escape velocity of the black hole would be the same with the speed of light, the material would stay on the surface of that thing. And that would cause the crunch of this object, what is called as the quark star or grey hole. A star is an intermediate form of the neutron star and black hole. If the material would not be released from that particle, it would sooner or later turn to a black hole.

There has been made a research about the WARP craft, what has been thought that it can cross the cosmic speed limit, and if that vehicle is described in NASA:s homepages, would people have right to trust those pages? And in the second case about the crossing the speed of light could happen is the black hole. The singularity is the point around this supermassive particle, where the gravity would accelerate the particle to the speed of the light. And we cannot collect any observations behind that point, what is called an event horizon.

There has been made research, that the speed of light would not be crossed if the material is falling in the black hole. OR ACTUALLY, THE MATERIAL CANNOT REACH THE SPEED OF LIGHT BEFORE EVENT HORIZON. When we are thinking about the event horizon, in that point the material or particles would reach so high that we cannot see things what happens behind that point. And in that point, the escaping velocity is the same as the speed of light, because there is no ability to get observations behind it, and that means that everything, what happens behind that point is pure theory.

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants and termites, what also are ants are interesting characters. Those social, wingless bugs are defending their base with a very big attitude, and some of them even die, when they are defending their queen and home. One of the most interesting characters in that community, where everybody would put their stakes to the work of the day is military ants.

Military- or soldier ants are the very aggressive version of ants, and their mission is to defend others. But how those ants would control those soldiers? Their jaws are terrifying and attitude is deadly, but why they are not attacking the workers? That is because the worker would feed that terrifying member of the community.

If the soldier ant would be aggressive, there would be the situation, that another worker comes to the place, and then those ants would relax that horrifying defender of the community. They are telling that everything is fine, and nobody would not threaten the position of that specific ant. And then those worker ants would give a small bite of sugar to the warrior.

That keeps soldier ant satisfied, and there is one little thing about that soldier ant, what protects the entire community. They cannot eat themselves, and those ants are not using their jaws to anything else than just fighting. Military ants cannot even eat, because in their stomach is not bacteria, what is necessary for eating, or transformation of the food to nutrient.

Ants are given an idea to nanomachines, what his group of robots, what are operating like one giant robot. This kind of robot can lose one part of it, and it can still operate. That poly- or swarm robot would also be more flexible than any other device in human history.

But the ants have given ideas of the society, where everybody has their place, and one of those workers, who would work in that futuristic society is the data worker, who would sit in the space station and control the drones and other devices on the Earth. In this hypothetical scenario, those data workers cannot escape or rebel, because they are addicted to the nutrient, what will bring from Earth.

When we are thinking about evolution, the ants have learned the communal working. In their society, every single ant has own duty. And if the duty is defending the society, those bugs would not do anything else.

In the next part, the world "future" can be replaced by the world "other civilization". What we will do and what we are looking in the distant future is a mystery, and without time machine we cannot find that out, how our decadents would live thousands of years after us. The evolution of ants has given the idea that maybe the future would bring to the world the real-life information workers, who are operating in the giant orbiting space station.

Those space stations would need the food from Earth, and that thing would keep them under the control. And those workers would operate the drones and robots on Earth. The thing is that if those controllers connection with robots must be cut, the thing, what the people on Earth must do is just jam the communication lines. If those operators would spend all of their life in the space station, their bones and muscles would be so weak, that those inmates would be dead, if they land to the Earth.

And in one scenario those characters would not have even consoles, and their brains are connected to the computers by using surgically installed microchips. They would also offer their brain capacity to solve problems, and if there would be a problem, the operator, who sits on Eart can just cut the connection of the microchip. The idea is that in those space stations would live people, whose brains can be connected, and that will gove those systems extremely high level of intelligence and ability to solve problems.

When does the state turn to serve the individual?

When does the state turn to serve the individual?

For some philosophers, the state is thing what is above all, and the reason for that is that the state has established to serve people. So the people of the state must serve the state. In this philosophical hypothesis, both sides of the relationship between the state and individual persons would both get the benefit of this relationship, where the state protects the individual and for that process, each individual must give their stakes.

This is one way to say, that the state is above all. The reason for that might be some people thought that the apple of power was actually the hand grenade, what could kill everybody, who was against the king. If the king was angry, that person could use the hand grenade.  

The words of the philosophers have been searched and researched for hundreds of years. And still, nobody doesn't know, what exactly those people thought or what they meant when they wrote their thoughts. There are always thoughts that some philosopher has meant, what that inmate wrote.

That means that the thing is seen in their texts, there might be many meanings in their writings, and sometimes I have thought, how much those great persons could be written, if they have not written their ideas to paper? When we are thinking about things like the relationship between an individual and the state, those texts causes strong feelings even today.

And if they would be found in 18th. century, that might cause a very dangerous situation. So what would Voltaire do with network-based publication tools? When we are thinking about the role of the individual in the state, we might find the level, where the state starts to be one man. 

The idea of that has been copied from the famous phrase, what Luis XIV said once. "I'm the state" would be a very interesting way to rule the country. That makes the ruler unlimited user of power. But there is one little thing, and that is that what if the state loses the war? Would the king have anything, why other people leave that man alive?

The king is in the middle of the state, and that person cannot escape if the war goes bad way, and henchmen tell always, that the king has given every order int the state. And they afraid that the king would punish them if they would not follow the orders, and one of the best explanations is that some of those henchmen believed, that the apple of power was the hand grenade, what the ruler would use against the henchmen. Was that true or false, that thing is unknown.

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We all want to see that our state is better than others, and when we are facing criticism, we will rise to our back feet like horses do, when they are afraid. This thing is visible in every state and nation in the world. And the thing is that the persons like Voltaire have faced that kind of things when they have said that the British Monarchy is better, advancing and respect human rights better than the French version.

And this kind of ideas has caused problems before and after the life of Voltaire. This kind of things are interesting to search and the fact is, that Voltaire was forced exile from France when he wrote that text. The reason for that was that Voltaire said, that Frech King was worse than British King, and that was not tolerated in that time.

Every person who was suspicious about the motives of the royal highness were traitors, and that caused anger in the mind of the people because if normal people would not be angry when the king was not the best in some poor writer's opinion was somehow "different". That means that when the king was angry normal people were angry too. 

The mind of the state is collective, and if the higher rank member of the society is angry every henchman is angry too. If that is not happening the disappointment of the leader would be great, and Santa Claus would not bring gifts. "This is the law of nature", is the normal argument in this kind of situation, when the leader turns all society against one person. This kind of leaders is always comparing their group to the wolfpack, where is the straight and holy hierarchy.

The person who is in the middle of the line of hierarchy probably likes that kind of things, but if the person is the last one, would that make that inmate unsatisfying. But the thing is that I represent the species, what is called human. Human has skills like discuss things without hierarch, and this thing makes us superior against wolves. But, when in wolfpacks the leaders would get angry, other members were angry too.

When the last member of the group would face trobles, nobody helps that inmate, because the hierarchy obligates only henchmen to follow leaders. If the leader face cheat, henchmen must defend the leader, but if henchman is facing the same things, nobody defends that inmate. This thing has caused that we have a democratic government. And the total or collective anger is often seen in the societies, what is controlling one person.

What if Nietzsche meant the word "abyss" not, "emptiness"?

What if Nietzsche meant the word "abyss" not, "emptiness"? 

Which world Nietzche used? Was it "emptiness" or "abyss"? This thing is really interesting question, because Friedrich Nietzsche wrote all his texts by using German, because German was his home language,  and he studied his studies in the University, where the official language was German. Reality is that the entire personality of Nietzche is some kind of suspicious because he died so young. And before that about ten years before his death, he got brain infarct and that ended his career as a philosopher.

The thing, what makes this person so disputed, is his work with super- or over human theories, where persons, who have moral, ethically and intellectual superiority to other people would take the power in the society. This theory might be brought really scary visions in the mind of Nietzche. If people would breed the super intellectual individuals that would create humans, which are aliens to other humans.

The thing is that the writings of Nietzche have created the idea of using genetic engineering for the fasten evolution. The base of those techniques is that the persons who are making this kind of things are using knowledge of genetic material for tracking highly intelligent people, and then create children by using natural or in vitro fertilization.

So was Nietzche upset about his idea? Did he understand what he created?  If the University is used as the source of genetic material those places are often very intelligent persons. They can be used to cross new people, and if this chain would continue long enough the new race of humans would rise. 

But when we are thinking about staring the abyss, we might find new and new details about this thing. An abyss is a scary place, which seems to be empty, like the Universe itself. But when we are thinking about the Universe it is full of mass and material, what people can ever see. And the abyss of the universe hides the brightest objects, what mankind has ever noticed.

Those objects are invisible to human, but if we are seeing those objects by using X- or gamma-ray telescopes. That means that regular observer would not even notice those objects, but if that astronomer or some other observer has X- or gamma-ray telescopes that person sees the bright and high-energy reactions what are creating that radiation. But if the Earth will travel through those radiation rays, that would cause the energy impulse just detonates our planet. And those things are interesting to think before going to sleep.

What Nietzsche meant when he said that when you staring to emptiness, emptiness is looking back to you?

What Nietzsche meant when he said that when you staring to emptiness, emptiness is looking back to you?

In the beginning, we might think that Nietzche meant that if we are just staring some person or place, we cannot find out a thing from that person's opinions or thoughts. Even parrot can repeat things, what other people say, but creating own ideas makes discussions more interesting. Or maybe we just throw some books to the table and read answers from those texts, what are made somebody else.

That allows us to say, that somebody else has said those words, but does that make us glad? Other people would say, that they will read those things rather from the books, and that's why we should start learning to think ourselves about some things because own ideas will take world and society ahead. If we are looking at the mirror, we might see a handsome person, who is somehow stranger to us. Are we looking like that character, what we see in the mirror?

We choose our clothes by using requirements or criteria, that they should be comfortable and look good and being adult. But how we can make our soft pants looking like an adult? When we are looking at the mirror, we see some over-aged hip hop guy, and then we might think that should we take our wife or girlfriend to shop for choosing our clothes? Maybe they are looking better when somebody else is choosing them.

But if somebody else is choosing those clothes, we can blame that other person about terrible looking clothes. But in that case, we must remember that in the case, that some clothes look like awful, we must realize that the decision of the buying those clothes is the thing, what we must do alone. We are the person who wears those clothes. But otherwise, if we are asking somebody to come with us to store, we must remember not to hurt that person.

And that's why we should go alone. If we don't want to listen to other people, why we are taking them with us, and if we are making that asking for nothing, that might cause anger reaction, and that person asks "why would you next time go alone? The money is mine, so I go alone. When we are staring ourselves, we might think that should we choose our clothes better way, or should we choose the new barber? Or maybe we just need to choose the restaurant to the place, where is offered food, what have fewer carbohydrates.

Normally we ever hear our voice as other people hear it because the sound would travel across our skull. And actually, the inventor of gramophone Thomas Edison was the first person, whoever hears his voice. 

This phrase is a very interesting thing when we are thinking about things, what we see in Social media and everyday life. One of the explanations is that every people can say or repeat, what other people have said. And that might seem very nice, but then Nietsche might mean, that he can read everything from books, and why this philosopher must ask everything because he already knows the answer.

 Sometimes we see the very interesting thing in social media, and that is that somebody is always telling or ordering people, what they should think or write in that discussion forum. But there is always another kind of explanations for that phrase. That explanation is that when people are looking at the space or universe to look for far bigger and extraordinary, what we are, we are forgetting the thing, that we should find the answers from inside us.

The universe is a very big place, and we are so little thing in that structure. So the thing is that if we are looking for things like aliens, we must see things, what is hiding in ourselves. The thing what we cannot see or what we cannot feel still exists.

But how this is connected to things, what Nietsche has said? The thing is that we can stare to emptiness forever, and the only thing what we see is our face. And then we can say, that there is nobody. The situation is similar if we would stare to some person, and say nothing to that inmate.

During a staring session, we can make conclusions of that person without saying a word, and things like clothes are giving a very good image of that inmate. Maybe that person has a nice suit and slips, and we think that person is a well trained, academically civilized person, but the truth is that this inmate can also be some door- to door salesman, who has ever been in schools.

The way how to create successful political movement or party

The way how to create successful political movement or party

What kind of political parties are successful in politics? The idea is that no group would ban from the voter's list, and also the party must get cooperatives also in parliament. This kind of things requires, that the name of the party doesn't give a negative image to some group of people immediately when they are seeing the name of the party.

The name of the party is very important. When some party would want to get success, it should find a balance between financial funding and the way to get votes. There is only a small group of really rich people on the Earth.  The regular people would give votes, and that's why there must not support the great financial power too much. But if the party would be profiled as the communist party, there would be hard to find funding.

And that's why the name of the party must be neutral, like the Social Democratic Party, or the Christian Liberal Party. They are not telling much about the party and its agenda, and that would make easy to change politics.  

But in the last case, the name of the party would give a negative image in the eyes of immigrants, who also give votes. The problem with choosing the agenda is, that there should find also cooperatives in the parliament if that party wants to get other parties with it in the cabinet.

If the political statements or name of the party are too radical or too tough, there would be difficulties to find the cooperatives inside the parliament, or the party can, of course, get a simple majority in that place. But that would be quite difficult in western democracies.

The thing is that the majority gives most of the votes in the election. This is what makes the creation of the political agenda very difficult, is that the people should look like an adult and avoid too radical statements. But at the same time, the political movement must wake interest in its agenda and ideology. This kind of things requires colorful people, who are speaking  "as the regular person would understand".

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

We should stop talking about nationalism and left-wing movements at the different kind of movements. There is no difference between right- or left-wing radicalism, and the result is always devastating. The thing what might give little brakes for Stalin and Tito was that they were members of the ethnical minority of their homeland.

They couldn't get support from the majority same way as Adolph Hitler could. And the thing why the nationalism was not so highly respected in the Soviet Union was that there were so many nationalities. Of course, Russians wanted people of the world think that they are the heir of the Soviet Union, and that's why there is so great nationalistic wave.

There is very long living opinion, that Russians created the Soviet Union and the entire state was created around Russia, who has rights for the heritage of the Soviet Union. And this thing makes possible to say, that Russia is the Soviet Union, what have lost some land areas.

When we are thinking about the far-wing radicalism, the normal version of their speeches is that they are not far-wing members and the things like fascism have been lost after the Second World War. The argument is similar, with the argument that Mafia does not exist anymore.

That thing is an argument, that the fascist and nazis were lost after WWII. There are some versions, that the Fascists and Nazis were some kinds of the right-wing movement, but the reality is that those movements were market themselves as the labor movement, and the nazism has got the name from their agenda of national socialism.

The difference between those movements is that national socialism is highlighting the greatness of the nation, and that thing also is supporting by the militaristic strength. When we are thinking about the power and the Marxism, the idea about the peace between labors is very good marketing speech. 

But the real socialism is looking like a little bit different than ideal socialism. There are many similarities with nazis and communists, and the reason why there were not so great nationalistic movement in the Soviet Union was that there were many nationalities in that country. Maybe Stalin had problems to create a real "team spirit" in his country because he couldn't just ask support from Russians.

He was Georgian himself, and that put him to a difficult position because he couldn't just agitate the people against minorities. That means that Stalin was one member of the very small minority in the Soviet Union. Hitler was a much better position. He could yell against Gypsies and Jews because he was a member of the majority of people. And that gave him the very good weapon against minorities. The argument of that kind of leaders in that the majority is the thing, who is ruling, and other people must follow the majority.

The location system is small-size, but how small they are?

The location system is small-size, but how small they are?

In some movies, the GPS-system is the size of a grain of sand, and that thing might feel a little bit overshooting. But in fact, this kind of location system is possible to make, and this system works like the small-size system would send the little signal to the mobile telephone, what that person uses, and then the operators can load the malicious software to that mobile telephone.

The thing is that malicious software would just turn the virtual switch, what controls the GPS of the telephone to the mode, that the switch can just move, but it would not influence the GPS itself. That means that the GPS would operate even if the power is switched off from the device. And the surveillance operators can search every movement of the targeted person.

Surveillance equipment mission is to collect the necessary information. And that means that if the operators are interesting about the location of the person, they might not want to see other things. When the surveillance team operates, they would follow their mission, and the thing is that their mission is to find out things, what people do, not what they are expected to do.

The idea is that the targeted person can tell something, what is not true. This is why those intelligence or spy services are existing. Their mission is to find out things, what the targeted persons are kept the secret, and one of the vital roles of them is tracking the people, who would sell guns or other dangerous material to inmates, who cannot carry or own those weapons. And if criminals would get things like assault rifles in their hands, the results would be terrible.

Emperor who sits in whisperers' box sentenced Saint Lawrence to death.

Wikipedia

Emperor who sits in whisperers' box sentenced Saint Lawrence to death. 

The picture in this text portrays Saint Lawrence before Valerianus. And in this fresco is hidden very interesting detail, and that detail is connected to the room, where Valerianus sits. That place could be the whisperers' box, where somebody, who sits above the emperor gives orders, what that man should do, or if the emperor would not follow the orders, the pike would drop on his head. That thing is warning, that the emperor would not always work from the own will.

Another detail, what might interest the people is why those soldiers have no shoes? Don't they need boots in their work, or hs the emperor given orders, that the floors must be clean? So is there the cleaning turn of his wife, because guards must take the shoes off? 

When we are looking at the story of Sait Lawrence and the detail, where he gave all the property of the church to poor people when the emperor asks it. That caused the slow and painful death because the emperor burned that man, who laughed his torturers and soldiers. The question is, who were those poor people, and what made them the treasure of the church?

The answer would be that if some patrician family members have turned to Christianity, that thing might uncover things like genetic weakness and ability to mental illness. That's why the emperor persecuted Christians at that time. Of course, there could be the reason, that some members of the even the highest rank Patrician families would be genetical weak.

But if in every case, when the people, who were part of some group would make children, the result is handicapped, would the problem be in the higher rank family. And if the emperor would be at the level of the child, that situation will be really interesting, because in that case, the politics will be very unstable, if somebody else doesn't use the power for the emperor.

We all live in bubble said, Immanuel Kant. But how big those bubbles can be?

We all live in bubble said, Immanuel Kant. But how big those bubbles can be?

There is many translations and analyzes, what is made of the writings of the great philosophers. The writings of those people have many layers, and we can see many sides in those ideas, what philosophers have been written during history, and there are many visions what are hidden in those texts, what would open after reading writing two or three times. And they are bringing always new focus to old things. Here I'm writing about the bubble of Immanuel Kant.

Immanuel Kant meant that we all hear, what we want to hear. And that phenomenon is seen, when we are seeing our neighbor, who we don't like. In those cases that person is telling bad things about ourselves, we all put the headphones to ears and listen to some kind of pop music or something else, that we cannot hear what those people are saying.

That thing is one of the best examples of this thing, which is called the "Kant's bubble". When we are thinking about the bubble, where we are living, the bosses of the building sites and companies, we would face the inmate who has other people in their bubble.

Next part of the text is thinking about the SETI-program, and why we cannot make contacts with other humanoids. So don't be "serious sam" when you read this writing. It is about microwave bubble, what can turn our transmitting away in the side of the humanoids planet, or maybe the microwave bubble of our side would make the same thing. 

So does all human race just hear the earphones and take selfies, because we cannot hear humanoids? In this case, our media acts like earphone and mobile equipment, which isolates us from other people. The similar effect can happen with an entire civilization, what wants to hear it's own ideas and thoughts.

And here we or at least I might think that could the entire population of the human race live in the bubble, what is similar to the bubble of the last example. In this point of view, the human race is so full of our specialty and shine, that we forget one thing. We are still addicted to planet Earth. But when somebody says, that "of course there are no humanoids", I must ask that person "how does that inmate know that thing?".

Who told that thing? So, the answer would be that "there is no answer to our message and those so-called messages are caused because of the broken microwave oven". And then the audience is laughing. Those highly trained astronomers didn't visit a local gasoline station or private home and check their microwave oven, and that makes them somehow "tired".

But then we must realize, that this kind of case is absurd. Astronomers responsibility is not to check every single microwave oven in the local areas, and otherwise leaking microwave oven can be dangerous. And the radio telescopes don't observe the frequencies, what microwave oven uses. But there is another way to say that kind of thing.

The question, what we can ask is that if we make the phone call to the boss of the building site, and that person doesn't answer would that make this person not existed? So what if those humanoids would not answer?

And the reason for that might be, that their transmitting with the synthetic radio frequencies might be so powerful, that their signals just sweep our transmitting away. This is one version of the bubble. We would live ourselves in the microwave bubble, what just turns the humanoid transmitting away. 

Conclusions

The size of the bubble might be huge, and huge bubbles have a huge effect because it asks other people to yell with us. That means that the big bubbles are more effective than average bubbles because those people are in the bubble with their leader, and the leader is telling, where the bubble should go because that person has the ownership for the bubble. If other people are not supporting that leader, the result is the kicking off from that bubble. This is one way to think and analyze that kind of texts. But as I mentioned before, the point of view those things are always changing.

The headline posters are telling what is the problem of society

The headline posters are telling what is the problem of society

The newspapers are an excellent tool when we want to make analyze the feelings of society. The headline posters are telling, what are the attitudes and problems with people, and they uncover the problems, what are felt as very important. But the question is, who thinks that those topics are really important is different, what normal people believe.

The persons who are choosing those headlines and articles are representing somebody. And that means that the selection maker thinks, that there are some problems with that. The idea of newspaper articles is to highlight things, what needs the fixing, and otherwise, they are meant for supporting some idea or ideology, and that makes those articles very well source when we are looking at the important things.

When newspapers are full of mental disorders and other kinds of things, and the idea is that the director's mental condition can turn down, there must be some kind of reason for that. Those things like mental condition are of course dear to some people, who are thinking about changing the ownership of the company.

And if the director or main owner can send to the mental hospital, that kind of things would be very easy. If the court system would give judgment, that the person is unable to handle things like own money, that means the inmate would be declared as the incompetent. Then there would be no need to ask opinions of that person. 

That would make discussions very easy because meetings can happen without that person exists in the discussions. This kind of things would make many things easier, and that's why some people like to ask medical help for giving support for their benefit from the medical staff. And psychiatrical problems are a very good stick in that kind of things.

Those problems are things, which are very good to sell in the court system, and the idea is that the mental patient can be dangerous. The movies like "Hannibal" are shown that psychiatrical patients right is different than other patients. And their guardians would not do a thing in this kind of cases. only one joke about Parkinson patient would cause the media reaction, but nobody even cares about the movies like "Hannibal" what also stamp the psychiatric patients.

And when Trump mentioned them as animals, the media cheers about that kind of things. This is interesting because media has judged the Trumps way to rule. But they didn't even say anything against those kinds of comments, and when we are thinking the depressions and suicides, most of the psychiatric patients are not criminals. So why this kind of things is so hard to justify. When we are thinking about books, where the drug addict has offered drugs to friends and caused their death, that kind of things is so-called acceptable.

The mass memory of tomorrow store data in the light beam.

The mass memory of tomorrow store data in the light beam. 

In the Finnish storybook "Goofs" is an interesting story about the situation, that some persons, what are called "Goofs" tried to carry the light out from the house in sag. That story brought my mind one thing, what people might usually don't know. That thing is that the researchers have created a method, where the beam of light would jump between two mirrors without external energy. That thing is possible when the space between those mirrors is cleaned, and there are no particles in a total vacuum.

Those particles like dust would suck the energy of the light beam, and that's why the space between those mirrors must be extremely clean. And then the temperature of those mirrors must decrease to absolute zero kelvin, that there would be no oscillation of those mirrors. Then the mirrors must equip the mirroring layer, what is outside of the glass, which removes the light absorption when it travels in the glass in regular mirrors.

The thing is that if the mirroring surface would be outside the mirror, the mirror itself would be made by using as example steel and that steel-plate would be covered with silver. In this case, the light could be trapped between the mirrors, and if we would make the sag or bottle, what has this kind of mirror surface, we can carry light. 

And if this device would store the laser-light, that would make it the ultimate tool for data storage, and this thing would be safe. If the other mirror would open, the laser ray would be released, and that data can be read by using the light cell, what transforms that data to the binary code. This can be the safe data storage of tomorrow. Maybe in the archives of tomorrow, those mass memories can be stored in the storage building like some book rolls, what ancient Egyptians used. But in this case, the text is stored in the light, what is jumping between mirrors.

Graphology and the psychoanalysis

Graphology and the psychoanalysis

We all have sometimes got the letters or paper bites from the mailbox, and those letters are written by the angry neighbor, who claimes that we have been noisy. But there is something strange in those letters. The thing is that, if our neighbor would be disturbed, why that person would not make contact with the police?

Why that neighbor would call the steward after days when that person claims to be disturbed? That person would know, that there is nothing, what the steward can do if there is no police report of that case. So why that person would write a message to the mailbox? Is there some information, what makes that inmate believe, that there is no need for police?

Is somebody claimed that the receiver of the note is somehow incompetent? And that thing might encourage that inmate act against the law. Or maybe that person thinks, that some rumor would justify everything that is made. This kind of things are reasons, why the nursery staff is bound to secrecy because that denies the possibilities of misunderstanding.

Normally threating messages are some tangles, which are drawn to the paper very fast. And those things are normally made by a person, who is drunk or angry. But the thing is that normal people would not act like that.  They don't drop papers to the mailbox, even if they are angry. 

The way, how people use language is uncovering their training, and especially, when the high-educated person uses language, what is full of misspelling, that thing would make some people suspicious, that everything is not, how people would like other inmates to see the thing.

If the person would get a threatening letter, the thing, what the investigator would search are things like how clear those writings are. Also, the selection of words and things like is the receiver mentioned are telling, is the writer dangerous, and if the person is dangerous, what kind of training that suspect has.

The thing is that highly educated people are writing some threats to the paper is very extraordinary. And in this kind of cases, that the threated letters are well-argued and it is used nice language makes the writer of those letters is dangerous.

If the texts seem written by the plan, that thing would be alerting. Written words are stronger than spoken words, and if the person would threat some inmate by using verbal violence, there is something wrong, and those kinds of threats should take under the discussions. But if the threats are written, those things are more serious.

Alcohol would be suitable fuel for the fuel cells, which makes robots more independent.

Alcohol would be suitable fuel for the fuel cells, which makes robots more independent.

One of the most realistic ways to use bacteria or leavens as the power source would use them to create alcohol, which is suitable for use in fuel cells. That thing would make robot independent from the electric sources, and the raw material for that thing can get from every supermarket.

The main problem with small-sized robots is culminating one thing, and that is how to make a compromise between effective computers and operative time of batteries or power source. There has been introduced one solution, and that is the robot, which uses ethanol in its power cells.

This thing has been created in my mind one very interesting idea, that the bacteria can be used as the source of fuel with a very traditional way, and that thing would operate by the normal fermentation. The leaven can create 96% alcohol by using starch and sugar as the source, and in this case, the robot would eat sugar and potatoes to the chamber, where lives the leaven.

That thing would create alcohol, which can be used as the power source in the fuel cells, where it can use as fuel. Or the robots can drink the 96% alcohol straight from the dish. Some futuristic scenarios the robots would come to fill their tanks like some dogs are coming to drink from the dishes. This kind of power sources can allow creating more sophisticated and independent robots than ever before. 

If we want to create more independent and more effective robots, but the thing is that small-sized robots cannot involve effective and powerful computers. The thing, what makes those robots very sophisticated and effective robots are the cloud-based calculating technologies, where the robot would outsource the problems to the central computer, what locates probably another side on the Earth.

Or it might communicate with the multi-type computers or data networks. That allows this system to find answers for problems through the Internet. But the thing is that this kind of systems needs powerful communication tools. Those communication tools must send non-stop images and other data to the Internet, and that kind of system requires powerful electric sources and the most effective version would be the fuel cell, what uses hydrocarbon like ethanol. That thing can produce in the vehicle by using natural method, what have been used thousands of years for producing alcohol.

Anti-drone weapons

Anti-drone weapons

The new threats would make a need to create new counter-weapons. Drone-swarms are the threat to the military forces around the world. And when we are thinking about counter-actions against those weapons the most effective thing against them, if we would use the conventional systems are the fast-shooting automatic shotguns like a shotgun version of the normal machine guns and cannons, what are shooting birdshot. The idea is that the drone-swarms would shoot a large number of steel balls, what mission is to shoot down as many drones as possible.

Those weapons can be as an example 155 mm. field howitzer, what is loaded with shrapnel ammunition, which makes that weapon very effective in the purpose, where is needed to destroy very many drones at the same time. But also microwave and plasma-based solutions would be effective in the case, where drone-swarms are attacking against some area.

If this kind of weapon is dropped from the aircraft above the swarm there is a possibility that the EMP-bomb would destroy all electronics of that drone swarm. But the EMP weapon, what bases the technology, where the battery is pressed with explosives. Also, the weapons, which are based with MASER (Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) would be used against drone swarms as well as many other targets. 

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/hpm.htm


The radars, what are operating by using high voltage microwave frequencies can also terminate incoming aircraft and as well as drone swarms. The difference between radio-and microwaves is that the microwaves are warming targets, and that's why they are used in a microwave oven.

If we would target microwaves to the head of the person, that would cause the same effect, what happens, when the cruel egg is put in the microwave oven. Microwave-frequential electromagnetic radiation would also heat the metals, and if the materials of the aircraft are melting, that would cause the situation, that the body of the aircraft would be destroyed.

That system would create extremely high power microwave burst can also be used against aircraft and satellites. The microwave would be very dangerous for humans and animals, but the reason, why those weapons are created is that the microwave area is sharper than with the use of napalm or some conventional explosive.

There are rumors that the HPV:s (High-Power Microwave Bombs) are meant to use also against the attacking aircraft. That means that those microwave burst weapons would be dropped from the satellites to the route of attacking aircraft and those weapons might sweep those aircraft from the skies. 

EMP-weapons might also damage electronics of the large warships, missile-sites and other places, where the electronics are in a vital role. But if we are thinking about non-lethal and existing things, the most effective weapons can be the ECM-systems, which are used normally to jam the radars.

Those systems can also use to deny the communication between drones and that means that drones lose the data-connections, also ECM-systems can jam normal encrypted communication, what uses the data transmitter. Also, those ECM systems can deny the use of IFF (Identification, Friend or Foe) systems, if they base the radio-communication.

Other versions of the IFF systems use optical data transmitters, what are immune against radio-wave based systems, but they are vulnerable to clouds and smoke, what denies those systems communicate with other systems. And the optical IFF-system is easy to hack. The aircraft or land station must just record those flashes, and copy them to own similar systems.

The moon shuttle concept of the future could also operate as the moon car

The moon shuttle concept of the future could also operate as the moon car 

Very interesting solution for Moon car would be the moon shuttle, what have wheels, which allows the vehicle to operate as the car on the surface of the moon and fly directly back to Earth. There is one very interesting detail in Moon vehicles, and that is that the solutions are always so complicated.

Why those vehicle concepts, what are meant for traveling on the surface of the moon are not equipped with rocket motors, that they could fly and drive with the wheels at the same time? The thing that the Moon lander could land and operate as the moving base, what can fly to Earth without the crew need to change the vehicle?

The construction is simple, the Moon car, or how those vehicles are called would be equipped with the rocket motors, what are below that vehicle, and the normal motor what would thrust backward? Or actually when we are thinking the things too complicated, and we always forget that there is no air, and there is no friction in the vacuum. 

That means that the device could flight in every angle and that means that the shape must not be aerodynamic. So the rockets, what nozzle would face down would also drive the craft to earth. And that would probably cause the artificial gravity in the vehicle. That vehicle would also have wheels, that it can also drive on the surface on the Moon like a car.

The benefit of those systems is that they could load the moondust to the cargo bay, and fly to Earth with this cargo. Those simple solutions are very interesting because if we someday in the future would use Moon as the commercial purposes, the thing what we would look for is the Helium 3 and other minerals. And that material can load to those shuttles ad those vehicles would fly them to Earth.

This is one of the interesting ideas of the systems, which can be used as the transporters. And they can transfer tools to Moon for making the railgun, what will shoot the manganese and other materials to Earth in capsules. But that kind of visions of the magnetic railgun, what makes traveling easy and cheap are somewhere far in the future.

The worst problems with long-term spaceflight are not technical

Apollo command and service module
(NASA image)

The worst problems with long-term spaceflight are not technical

In scientific and fictional books and writings and films, the problems of the long-term spaceflight have been mentioned the technical and physiological problems, like long-term staying in the zero-gravity would make muscles so weak that the astronauts cannot walk on the destiny, and that thing causes many dangerous visions.

What if they would be too weak to climb up the stairs with their spacesuits, or those suits would be too heavy anyway. The worst problems are social, and the biggest question is, what happens if somebody would get angry?

Or what if somebody gets hurt? What if some member of the crew is the wrong choice, and that member of the crew starts to cheat other members? When the spacecraft would travel between Earth and Mars, there is no way to take control of the situation, if somebody would start to act dangerously? What would those people do in that case?

There have been some horror stories, which are located in the space, and one of the most horrific scenarios is that, what if there would be a serial killer in the crew. In that case, the flight control must just decrease the gas pressure, that all the crew members would get unable to operate, and the craft would remote controlled back to Earth.

But there is another version of this kind of problem, and that is, what if some crew member would not dare to land to another planet? Or how the administration will recruit a member of the team, whoever lands to another planet? How to tell that person, that the role is vital, but there is no glory? That there would not any public question about that member of the team.

This kind of thoughts has raised in my mind one question about the social tests, what are made in the closed environment. That is "how realistic those experiments are in the real-life"? Would the test controllers tell those members of the test team, that their family members are dead if some kind of accident would happen? Or would the commanding team of the Mars-flight tell that thing to crew member, if that kind of sad thing will happen?

Nanomachines are the ultimate tool for intelligence and engineering.

Nanomachines are the ultimate tool for intelligence and engineering.

There is a couple of things about so-called cyber bugs, what people usually don't even know. One thing is that those nano bugs can even read minds. The technology is quite easy, the robots, what are equipped with sensors, what are detecting the magnetic fields are starting to fly around a targeted person's head. They will detect the changes in electric functions of the brains and that group of the nano drones will operate like MEG-scanner.

Similar drones can also be used to make 3D X-Ray images with similar methodology. The system would consist of two drones, which work as a couple. Another part of this pair would send the X-rays and another part of this pair would be equipped with a receiver and the system would operate like normal X-Ray scanner. Drones will fly around the target and make the X-ray image of the object.

That kind of nanomachines and robots can uncover almost all of our secrets. And they can be anywhere. The nano bug might look like a butterfly, where it can use the solar power for operations. Those bugs might have hybrid power product, which means that they can use a lightweight silicon panel, what is installed in their wings as well as miniaturized power cells.

That means that those drones can drink hydrocarbon like alcohol and methane like normal butterflies. But they can also benefit solar power on a sunny day.  Or the electric power can also transmit to those systems by using high-power radio signals. But those nanomachines can play everything else.

Those devices can carry miniaturized recon devices like small cargo planes, or those robots can spy objects themselves by using the microphones and miniaturized cameras, what can be in their feet, and those systems might record the voices, what are transmitted through the windows and walls.  And they might have miniaturized poison and explosive detectors as well as miniaturized laser microphones.

The laser microphone can also be used as laser spectrometer, and modern technology makes them extremely small. If those systems detect explosives or poison gas storages they can send message to the command center, and mark that location for the attack planes by using GPS.  The target is moving, those devices can sit on them, and transmit the target data non-stop, which helps attack plane locate those targets sharply.

They can look like string or clips, and those systems can slip in any room in the world. Nanomachines can install the plasterboards or concrete elements, and they can use as the recon but also attack devices. And they are unable to detect by using normal chemical or radio detectors.

Cursed merchandise and modern technology

Cursed merchandise and modern technology

When we are hearing that some merchandise is cursed, and we would want to research that thing, we must find out if that curse would be connected only to the specific merchandise itself or something, what is inside it. When we are thinking about something like cursed video cassette, we must find out, is that curse in the film itself, and is that curse visible also in other formats, like the digital file?

Or does that curse effective only, when the person uses the certain video-cassette? In some modern scenarios, the criminals or foreign agents would change the laptop computer of the targeted person. And that thing would send subliminal messages and flash pictures all the time to screen. And those images and messages can be stored to microchip, that they are working on some certain computer.

So in the first case, the film might involve the flash images and subliminal commands, which causes bad feeling and fear. The thing is that those images are visible if the film is searched by the picture to picture.

But if the curse involves only to the certain VHS-tape, would that mean that somebody has been put some chemical component like nerve-agent like VX-nerve gas on that tape. But there is also another version of that thing, and this version is that the VHS-tape would involve things like nanomachines. 

When the hypothetical technician makes that kind of things, that person might just put very small robots in the cassette, and then there would be the control unit in the same box, and then that system would release the nanomachines to the room, and after they have done their job, those machines can return to their base, what is that VHS-tape for re-use.

Those machines, what is looking like water drops, and acts like computer-controlled amoebas can simply slip in the body, and block the blood veins in the victims head, and then slip out. Those systems might be made by using silicone, and they are invisible to the chemical sensors. The movement of those robots would be happening by the nano technical rings, which are controlled by small microchip.

The ghosts and the memories

The ghosts and the memories

Sometimes the explanation for the ghosts is so-called PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) or flashback vision, which brings the traumatic memories to the mind. When people are walking in the areas, where they have spent their childhood, there is sometimes flashbacks, where a person feels again things and experiences, what has been faced in the younghood.

When some person, who we loved is dead, that dead inmate comes into our dreams, and sometimes we see those people standing on the places, where we have seen that man or woman often during the lifetime. When we are sometimes coming in the rooms, what are similar, where we lived in the younghood, there is a possibility, that we would see things like paintings pictures and other things like they were when we were in that room a long time ago.

Those things are flashbacks from the past. And sometimes those flashbacks are the reason about violent behavior. If the person asks another for walking, and the situation and the person's clothes were similar, what the person, who violated us used during the assault would happen, that the inmate cannot handle the behavior.

In the cases, where some other person would tempt another human to the trap for robbery, the case could cause the PTSD. And if that person would face a similar situation, would the flashbacks be very realistic and strong. That means that the person would go to condition, that it is impossible to separate the memory from the things what happens right now. And those things might be really scary.

The miniature submarines can spy houses

The miniature submarines can spy houses

The nanotechnical or miniaturized versions of the submarines, what are used for checking the oil tubes can be used to slip in the houses, and surveillance everything, what happens in the certain rooms. That kind of submarines is the size of the cigarette filter, and they can travel in the tubes to a certain position, and those systems can record every sound, what they can detect in the room. The system would use sonar or some other location system, and the drone is looking at it's advancing in the tubes.

The infrasound sonar or some other sound-based system is necessary because the batteries are made by using metal, and that denies the use of the GPS or other radio-based location systems. The midget submarine would slip in the heat radiator, and start the surveillance operation. Those systems might record speech and other sounds, and then they will get orders by using the ultra- or infrasound system, what operates as a modem.

The order would make the submarine return to the place, where operators could get it with them. And the way to operate bases the small-sized inertial navigation system, which allows recording the route. Because the system is used the passive recording, the systems, what detects the radio-communication would be forceless. 

When the mission is over, the operator would send the coded message, but those small-size submarines would get orders to return to base, by an agent who simply tapping the certain rhythm to the radiator. And when the miniature submarines are in a certain location,  they would send the sonar signal for operators, who will download the records from the mass memory simply by connecting that submarine to USB-gate or using the wireless communication. This system would be STEALTH, unable to detect and effective.

The cloning of political character

The cloning of political character

Political characters are like popstars. They are both addicted to popularity, which makes people buy them like some product. If the person would not please the electors, they don't sell records or political agenda.

And this is why the image is a very important tool for the politicians as well as the popstars. The supporters of the campaigns are following what kind of people would be elected to the top position, and then they would drive those characters to the campaigns in other areas.

The best result for the politician would give a satisfying political set and nice image, which will make the politician as well as the interesting and pleasing person, whose agenda is also easy to sell for people. A modern politician must realize, that the social media would be an effective tool as well as creating an image and destroying it.

Only one wrong photograph would cause the end of the career, and those things are things like hunting safari, lying about some heroic actions and films, where the person would speak derogatorily of electors or some national proud. And those things could cost a career. The thing is that the politician must understand that the decisions are making regular people, and if the voting percentage is very low, would that tell that politics is not interesting. 

But it tells that there are so many similarities in the political programs, that people would think that it's same, who would go to parliament. Cloning the political programs are the thing, which will cause that people will lose their interest with political leaders because politicians make decisions about how the resources of the nation are used.  And this is the legal role of the parliament and other political systems.

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Do you notice the similarity between images of pop-star Ed Sheeran and the political star Boris Johnson, who is now the prime minister of Great Britain? Boris Johnson is now the prime minister in Great Britain, and he says that Britain would leave the EU with or without agreement. And Johnson has been said, that Great Britain would not pay the severance pay. But who cares about those things anyway, would the EU declare war to Great Britain, if that money would not be paid. What is the real choice in that situation?

The thing is that the Brexit is the storm in some glass of water, what locates in some cabinets, and if that thing has something to do with regular people is, that they will lose 12 000 workplaces. That thing does mean anything when people are hearing when Britain is great again. But do you know, what makes Boris Johnson a very effective politician?

The answer is simple Boris Johnson is different than others. The image with unkempt hair would be similar to Ed Sheeran, and because Johnson seems different the reporters would come to his and ask things. And the media writings where that man claimed to be some kind of "motormouth" makes him more interesting. Of course, tough speeches are also giving trust in the eyes of electors, and the terms what that man uses are very easy to understand.

But who cares about those things. Boris Johnson is a very popular person in Britain because that kind of people is normally very successful politicians. Boris Johnson is like the political version of Ed Sheeran, the man who would talk things, what regular people wants to hear. And that makes those persons very easy to understand. They will drive their political agenda very effectively, and that makes them easy to hear.

If we would transfer our mind to computer memory, would we feel and hear like in the natural world?

If we would transfer our mind to computer memory, would we feel and hear like in the natural world?

The idea of copying the human mind in the computer is caused theoretical thinking, what would we feel, if we would able someday copy our mind in the computer and Internet. Would we feel that thing, or would we live in the electric dreamworld, until we can transfer our mind in another body? When we are thinking about the case, that every single memory in our life would be recorded to memory of the computer by using the microchip.

This microchip would be the ultimate tool what allows the brains to load the data non-stop to the Internet, we are facing the philosophical and maybe also psychological problem, that even if we can clone the body, and transfer the mind or electric vortex to another body, would that person be the same? Even if the behavior of the clone would be similar to the original person, we must think, is that person the same?

That thing is that there is many "if" and transforming things in the human brains, that we could probably ever make the perfect transplant of the mind.  The idea is when we are thinking about the case, where the human mind would transfer to the memory of a computer, we would face the reality, that it is impossible to make enough connections in the computer, that their calculating power would be the small part of the human brain capacity.

So if we are thinking about the situation, that we could transfer our mind to the quantum computer. Would that thing, be that we would live like in some kind of "Tron" movie? Sometimes we are facing the theory or philosophical thought, that the human lives in the computer memory. That thing would be very interesting, and in some version, the philosophers have thought, that how many internal computer virtual world could have existed.

The virtual multiverse can be created by using the computer and programs. Virtual space would handle as the universe and that allows to create the virtual multiverse by connecting those virtual worlds. 

Have you seen a dream, that you see dreams? How many of those internal experiences could be possible? And how many internal virtual worlds might be in the computer memory? The thing is that the world inside the memory of computers can understand as the virtual universe.

And in this version on the Internet might be the virtual multiverse, where the virtual universes are internal, and they can be also equivalent. That means that there would be similar virtual worlds, which can be created by human, or in some interesting theories the virtual world can form spontaneously by the crab code, what cannot be destroyed by the user of the Internet.

This is because the code is in multiple places, and the erase-orders would not be effective in that scale of the cloud system. The data is stored in multiple places, and every piece of data involves the code, what algorithm uses when it collects the data because the bits must be in a certain order.

In this case, the computer would not find every single piece of information if the higher level of the bite of the code would be destroyed. And maybe that code would create the virtual wastelands on the Internet. Who knows what happens on the Internet, what is the most important tool in modern society. And maybe computers would collect that code to the place, what is hidden from the users, and that thing might be the topics of some new movie or book, where the heroes would go in the Internet wasteland.