Skip to main content

How many errors we would find depends on the used accuracy. And then we must ask: what is needed accuracy?

 

Technical advantage and accuracy in the point of view of the research. 


When we are looking at things like a technical advantage, we have forgotten that some solutions, what seems non-practical in history, would turn very practical if they are controlled by artificial intelligence, and one example of those things is STEALTH aircraft. By using modern computer technology and interaction between the sensors and computer allows that the aircraft can turn the most affordable part of the body towards the radar, and then that thing would maximize the effect of the STEALTH-form. This is one of the things, what we must think about when we are creating new things.

The way of seeing things is the most important part of the research. And if we are looking by using a very big zoom or the accuracy, we might see mistakes and errors in every single particle and object in the world. Even if we are seeing the layer, what is looking like a solid and tight thing, we must realize that if we would use extremely high accuracy, we might see holes in every single object and layer in the world.

Now everybody says, that there are no holes in the metal layer, but when we are using very high accuracy, we might see that there are holes between the atoms, what is forming the layer. The atomic level of the structure is always finding the holes, which is so small that even photons cannot go through them. The thing is that if the atoms of the metal would be straight in the line, and the photons would be enough, we might see that light goes through the object. In the natural world, even photons are not flying straight routes. Gravity would affect their moving direction.

And if we are thinking carefully the thing, what is called as interaction, the smallest particle has affected to photons, but we cannot measure that effect. But when there are enough particles, that thing would change the effect to measurable. When the escape velocity of the surface of particles would increase very high, that means even the photons would drop in that particle, what is called "black hole".

How many errors we would find depends on the used accuracy. And then we must ask: what is needed accuracy?


In the quantum world, the photons are always chancing their course when they are moving near other objects, and every layer is full of holes, but do we need that accuracy in real life? There is a possibility that gluons are connecting with the photon in some distant future, and form the material. And should we prepare for that by buying the sunglasses, because someday our house can be formed by photons, and that would harm our eyes? That is a really interesting point of the view in that kind of thing.

But when we are thinking theory and practical world, are we always think that every layer is full of holes? Or are we think that photons would not travel straight routes? No in normal life and world of normal size objects, we must not think those things. But otherways we might think that the subatomic particles are also "normal size objects", and then we will start to think about the description or definition of the normal-size objects, we must ask: "are all objects, what are invisible to us some kind of abnormal"?

So is the human eye and ability to see things the thing, what defines is the object normal size or not? We might say that something exists, but we cannot observe it. Or we can observe something by using very advanced tools like electron microscopes. But then we must realize that somebody can send us faked information just sending the framed information to the screen. And that thing means that the faked information can be the purpose or accidental.

The accidental way might be that some operators would start to watch the movie by using the same screen, which is meant to use in some scientific experiments. But did those operators know that there are some other things, where those screens were reserved? If a person doesn't know that there is some other use for the system, that means that the fault is not those persons, if they are not told that the computers are reserved for some other purposes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of