Skip to main content

The point of view of use he DNA as the evidence

The point of view of use he DNA as the evidence

DNA would tell to researchers what we are. We always are hearing stories, how DNA has been helping to find out, who is the criminal. But many ties we have forgotten one thing, and that is that DNA shows that a person has been a crime scene, nothing more. The thing, where the DNA has been found is also very important because some kind of merchandise can just be dropped to the crime scene for decoys for law enforcement. 

So if somebody would want to make some other person the so-called "practical joke" that thing can be made by stealing the jacket or gloves of that person and then leave that thing to the crime scene. That kind of thing must be realized when we are thinking about the ability to track people by using the DNA or another bio-metrical identification system. 

Even if we have cleaned the mobile telephone or laptop from the data, what we think is important, the system itself can be used to identify the user. One version is to make "little visit" to the database of the authorities, and the other version is to use a private fingerprint recognition database. If we want to use some imagination to recognize the user of the computer, that image can be the fingerprint card, which can be used in the same way with another recognition image. That means that every employee of the corporation would give their fingerprint to the card, and those images would be used as the passport to data, which is stored in the database of the company. 

But that kind of thing is causing problems if some person would give the mobile device. The fingerprints and DNA from the layers of the mobile device can be used to track person, or if the bad willing actor would have DNA polymerize kit in use, that actor can make copies of the DNA, what is collected from some layers, and use that thing to bad purposes. This is the thing, what we must think when we are making copies of the DNA. 

DNA would tell if the person has some genetic problems like diabetes. And in the wrong hands, that kind of thing would be really dangerous. Even the synthetic synthetic sugar substitutes are not dangerous in the normal case, in this kind of case aspartame could kill a person, if the sugar in the glucose injection would be replaced by using that kind of synthetic product. If the diabetes patient would go to shock and there is no sugar, that thing can cause death. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of