The brain cells in a dish are learning faster than AI. 

The brain cells in a dish are learning faster than AI. But when we are thinking. That those brain cells at dish should learn only one thing. Those brain cells could learn a single thing faster than regular human brains because they need only one connection between them. So if we would minimize the data mass that is loaded to the neurons. We can make them react very fast. And also, they can learn that data faster than human brains.

In the cases, when data mass that loaded to the brain is minimal. There is a smaller number of connections between those neurons. So when neurons are handling data they must not search connections. 

The reason why brain cells in a dish are learning faster than brain cells in human brains. Is that the brain cells in the dish can use their entire time. for solving some problems. The brain cells in the human brain must sometimes concentrate on some other things. So there are cuts in the data handling process of human brains. And also there are lots more information that the human brain must handle than certain problems.

There is a reason why human brain cells in a dish are learning faster than human brains. The reason for that fast-learning process is that those brain cells in the dish must handle more limited information than normal brains. If the only thing what those brain cells must learn is some game like chess or video game those brain cells would learn the thing very well and fast. In the real world, what means places outside laboratories neurons must handle larger data masses than in laboratories. 

When people are walking on the streets, their brains must handle many types of signals. If those neurons would be in the dishes. The only thing that they must do is to learn some computer games. That thing is called sensorial adaptation or selective sensorial adaptation. The idea is that the neurons must be in the chamber where they are learning only one thing. 

And if that thing is the only stimulus that those neurons get. That thing will make them learn that only thing very well. Sometimes introduced a theory that "Kaspar Hauser" (1812-1833) the "boy who has grown in the barrel" or at least in total isolation was the victim of "selective adaptation" experiment. In that case, the only stimulus that this poor man got would be the military tactics. 

But the brain in the jar has brought one thing to my mind. Even those mini-brains would be small-size they are learning things. The memories of the person can transfer to those cells. And if there are enough brain cell cultures. That thing makes it possible to store memories in those cells. And then transmit them to another person. 

The thing is that the memories can transfer to the cell cultures. Makes it possible to talk with animals. If those memories can project to the screens of the computer that thing can give data. About how animals are living? The memories of the animals would download to the cell cultures and then those memories could transport to the screens of computers. Or of course, some extreme scientists would transfer the EEG of those brain cells to their brains. 

There is the possibility to transfer "trained neurons" to the nerve channel of the fetus. And that thing is opening new and very fascinating and same way frightening visions in my mind. That thing would make it possible to create the learning process that continues over generations. So that thing could be the real "deep learning". That means people like highly trained military officials would multiply. 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2301500-human-brain-cells-in-a-dish-learn-to-play-pong-faster-than-an-ai/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar_Hauser

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/