Skip to main content

The black hole and the event horizon

The black hole and the event horizon

The golden rule about the black holes is that we cannot get information from the area what is behind the event horizon. This means that "being in the black hole" means actually "being behind the event horizon".

The event horizon is an area around the black hole. That thing is actually the point in the trajectory, what particle goes before it drops in the black hole. And the point, where the particle disappears from the eyes of the observers is called "the event horizon". When we are thinking about information, what disappears behind that point, we must realize that everything, what we are writing or talking about thins, what happens behind the event horizon is speculation.

We cannot get any observations of those things, because even the light cannot escape behind that point. So the event horizon is the point, where we can make the last observation of the particle, what is traveling through that point. And that is the thing, what we must realize when we are talking about black holes. The golden rule about black holes and the information about them is that we can get information only from the areas near the black hole, not from inside the black hole or behind the event horizon if we want to be sharp, as I wrote at the beginning of this text.

What kind of is the word behind the event horizon?

This is a very fascinating question, and sometimes I have written that in this point the particle breaks the light barrier and starts to travel faster than the speed of light. And the argument that supports this claiming is movement continues behind the event horizon. The laws of physics should exist behind that point, and the term "inside the black hole" means actually "inside the event horizon", but would we ever touch the surface of the black hole?

The physic form of the black hole in the material, which is extremely thin. The entire star has been crushed as the size, which is smaller than an atom. And this has brought in my mind one very interesting thought. Could there be multiple nested singularities inside the event horizon? When we are thinking about things like wormholes, there are theories that the material, what drops inside the black hole would come out from the white hole. And actually, we haven't seen any of them in our universe.

So this has been brought in our mind the thing, what is called as "multiverse theory", and that is that the information goes through the channel or the string to another universe if there is a black hole, what oscillates in the same frequency with the black hole, what pulls the particle inside it in our universe. The thing what makes multiverse- and string theories very interesting is that the idea of those theories is that every particle in our universe has a couple or duplicate in another universe, and those duplicates are connecting together with gravity strings, what is forming the tunnel between them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of