Skip to main content

The AI makes aviation safer.

  The AI makes aviation safer. 


MIT created the AI that follows the pilot's behavior. That kind of AI is a so-called technical copilot, whose mission is to assist the pilot. Developers are making similar systems to cars and other transportation tools. The equipment to which AI has access determines its abilities. And the AI copilot is the tool, that can correct the errors that humans make. 

Many crashes happened actually after some other dangerous situation. When pilots first survive some close-call situation, they simply forget to make some routine maneuvers or release the landing gear. In the car, people can stop it and breathe. But in the air, the aircraft continues its flying after those situations. 

And in some other cases human error, like misunderstanding who should fly the aircraft while landing causes an accident. Or the communication between the copilot and captain somehow is misunderstood. 




"With Air-Guardian, a computer program can track where a human pilot is looking (using eye-tracking technology), so it can better understand what the pilot is focusing on. This helps the computer make better decisions that are in line with what the pilot is doing or intending to do. Credit: Alex Shipps/MIT CSAIL via Midjourney" (ScitechDaily.com/MIT’s “Air-Guardian” – AI Copilot Enhances Human Precision for Safer Skies)

In some close-call situations, pilots simply made mistakes and landed aircraft on the wrong airfields or runways. To avoid that kind of situation the airfield or runway must equipped with a communication system that uses laser or coherent radio communication that tells the aircraft the runway that it approaches. 

And then the copilot just pushes the stick, and the captain pulls it. Those situations could avoided by using a system that tells if the pilot and copilot are making opposite movements with control systems. The AI can have the ability to land aircraft at the airfield. If the pilot is unable to operate. 

You can search YouTube by using the words "wrong runway". There is a list of cases where aircraft landed on the wrong runway or wrong airport. It's possible to avoid this kind of case if there is a system that tells what runway the aircraft approaches.  

In some other cases, somebody mistakenly sends two aircraft to the same runway at the same time. And it's possible to avoid those situations by using a system that tells if there is another aircraft on the way to the runway. 

The system requires that all aircraft and flight control just communicate with each other. And then the automatized system just orders to slow rolling speed and wait until the runway is clear. The system requires that all aircraft know the real runway that they approach or roll and share that information with others. 




The need to create a system that can take control of aircraft during hijacking was seen in the 2001 terror strikes where hijackers flew passenger planes towards the WTC building.  If the aircraft is out of course, and doesn't follow flight plans there must be some other way to take control of the aircraft, than just shooting aircraft down. 

The AI must recognize if there is somebody else on the pilot's chair than the pilot. In the case, that the hijacking happens. The automatic system must just fly aircraft to the airfield and call law enforcement to take control of the situation. 

The automatized, AI-controlled autopilots can make biztalk with the airfield when the aircraft is closing. Then the airfield gives the values like closing angle and speed that the aircraft must follow. Same way. Things like wind direction and other important things, like cloud altitude, will sent to the aircraft. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mits-air-guardian-ai-copilot-enhances-human-precision-for-safer-skies/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of