Skip to main content

What comes after Chat GPT?

 What comes after Chat GPT? 


The ICT business is hectic. This operating area requires a willingness to learn new things over an entire career. ICT lessons and training are things that teach people to search for information. The situation in the ICT business is always like this: Things that students learn can be old-fashioned in one month. 

The last big advance was the GUI (Graphical User Interface). And that thing took jobs from the bat. programmers. The next big thing is the AI. First came the Chat GPT which can make computer programs by following instructions. That controller gives. And the next big thing was that the AI integrated with the search engines. 

AI is a useful tool, especially in programming. Data that it requires are well documented and short in the form that the AI can use without problems. The AI can make complicated computer programs by collecting data from the internet. And that thing makes it superior to human programmers. The Chat GPT is a programming tool that can search other data from the net. That computer program is the biggest change in the history of computing. 



The Chat GPT is not a thinking creature. It's a next-generation tool that can make computer programs by following instructions. But, when Chat GPT makes something, it just connects some databases to new entities. So creative AI has no imagination at all. When people want to give orders to AI to make something, the orders must be precise and clear. If orders are not clear the AI can make mistakes. And that's why we cannot yet say "goodbye" to programmers. 

Chat GPT is an extremely advanced programming editor that can follow orders. The user gives by using spoken language. That means the user must not know anything about programming languages. But if we want to make something like a business letter by using AI, we must be careful, because there is always a possibility that the AI uses "non-relevant" sources. And that's why people must follow what that system makes. 


The nanomachines require small and powerful microprocessors. And it's possible. That is the next field for the AI. Is to control and develop the nanomachines. 


But when we think about the next-generation solutions that can supplant the Chat GPT, one thing, that we can mention is the "iron AI". The term means the same with embedded AI. In that case, the AI uses living neurons, or the microchip's kernel is equipped with the AI. Embedded AI that is installed straight in microchips can make it possible to control nanomachines. 

The nanomachines require small and powerful systems that can control nanorobots with extremely high accuracy. The thing is that the nanorobot requires similar computer power as regular-size robots. And that makes it hard to make this kind of solution. The small size of nanomachines creates limitations for the data handling capacity of that system. The swarm of those tiny machines can clean the human body. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of