Russia transfers "Iskander" tactical ballistic missiles near the border of Ukraine.

The thing is that situation at the Ukraine border is turning hotter. The Russian highly mobile SRBM (Short Range Ballistic Missiles) was transported near the Ukrainian border. Those highly mobile battlefield systems are extremely powerful. And they can transport to the operational area fast. Those missiles are The 9K720 Iskander (NATO reporting name SS-26 "Stone"). There is one thing that makes those tactical missiles very "interesting".

They are hard to find but "easy to destroy". The thing that can be effective against those systems is the "Predator" drone that can patrol at the sky and then destroy the missile launchers. But that thing is extremely difficult to make in the practical world. There is the possibility that there are infrared and radiation suppressors in those transporter vehicles. So they are not easy to find. And they are supported by anti-aircraft and jet-fighter combinations. So that means that those "Iskander" missiles are hard to destroy.

Those mobile launchers can bring to the operational area by using the airplane. And there is possible parachute delivery ability in those launcher trucks. That means the large-size strategic cargo planes can drop those missiles into a combat zone where they can whip enemy forces away in seconds. There is the possibility that there is some kind of "police role" in those tactical missiles. They can use to destroy also rebellious troops.

There are many types of warheads in those missiles. The nuclear, bunker-busting, or cluster warheads with HE and thermobaric options are the things that are making those advanced and deadly missiles capable and respected systems. In nuclear strategy, those tactical missiles are supported by aircraft and more powerful strategic missiles. So if tactical systems fail, the next step is to use full-scale thermonuclear devices.

Why have those highly mobile nuclear-capable missiles are not ever faced criticism? Why they are more acceptable than some "Predator"-drones? The missiles are the most powerful weapons. And there is always a risk that the battlefield missile systems will be stolen.

Predator drones are faced criticism but those tactical missile systems have not caused any kind of discussions. Those tactical nuclear-capable missiles are the thing that might seem only the battlefield use weapons. But the fact is that nuclear warheads make them very capable and feared systems.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-1_Predator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Atomics_MQ-9_Reaper

Comments

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog