Skip to main content

The problem in innovation meetings is how to make people share their knowledge?



Many times in innovation meetings are two benefits against each other. The personal interest of the individual worker might be hiding the ideas. And the benefit of the company is that the person shares those innovations or ideas that can turn to innovation. 

One thing about teamwork is that if the people are staying in their workplace during all their working period that sounds fine. When people enjoy their work they know their work and all stages of work very well. But there is one negative thing about that kind of way to make jobs. The problem is that if the people in the work never change their workplace that causes the problem to get new ideas for the company. 

If people have ideas. But they don't want to share them. This thing means those ideas are not even known. Sharing ideas is in a key role in innovation meetings. Silent knowledge is an interesting thing. But people should let other people know about their knowledge. 

This means that there might be many wise men on Earth. But if those people are ever sharing their thoughts and ideas. If that knowledge remains silent that thing does not benefit the workplace or company. The problem with silent knowledge is that it's capital for a person. And people would not want to share their skills with people who they feel like competitors. 

Personal skills and knowledge brings value to the person. And those things are important when the person wants things like promotions. That thing limits the will to share knowledge which might have a great value for the company. 

When a company requires new ideas in innovation meetings. They need visible knowledge. The term "visible knowledge" means ideas and innovation that a company and its leaders can benefit from while they are making products. They do nothing about the silent knowledge. Innovation meetings are meant for getting information on how to make a company's products and services better and more addictive. 

The problem with fixed-period workers is that they might have motivation for sharing their ideas. The new employee might not necessarily bring ideas to the company. Sharing ideas requires that person wants to share ideas. But also the workgroup needs will receive those ideas. If those people are not listening. That would not motivate people to participate in the innovation processes. And innovation plays a key role in the productization process. Every company requires new products and concepts that it remains as the 

That means there are no new ideas in the workplace. But the problem is that the fixed-time employers would not want to bring their full know-how to the working team. The people who are working in fixed periods feel being outsiders. Employees who have normal employment relationships might feel that fixed-time workers are competitors. 

The normal question is why the fixed-time employee wants to bring their full know-how to the company?  How do motivate those people participating to share their ideas with the workgroup? If there is no way to get a regular working relationship with the company. That means that the person would not want to make an extra thing for the team. And there is the possibility that the team would not listen to those opinions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.

 Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.  The modern Hounds of Baskerville ABW:s (Advanced biological weapons are the modern Hounds of Baskerville. The term ABV means the animal which is genetically engineered. And which is controlled by using some interactive electronic systems. There is a possibility to connect the action camera to dogs collars. And transmit commands to that animal by using electronic systems. Spoken words can use to the commands.  Or they can be a series of sounds that are stored in the sound files. When the operator activates a certain file that sound means a certain command to the animals. There is the possibility to automatize some commands by connecting the system to the image recognition tool. When the action camera sees something that is stored in the memory of the computer. That system sends the coded order to the animal.  Nanotechnology and genetic engineering are the most lethal combination in the world. The ABW:s (Advanced Biological ...

The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta"

    Image I The story of (Northrop?) TR3A "Black Manta" Sometimes there have been discussions that the mysterious TR3A "Black Manta" was a study project for the B-2 bomber.  That means that TR3A was used as the flying mockup for testing the aerodynamic and control solutions for the B-2 "Spirit" bomber. The thing that supports this thing is that the manufacturer of both planes is Northrop corporation.  Along with "Aurora" was flying one other mysterious aircraft, TR3A "Black Manta". The system is described as the "Stealth VTOL" (Vertical Take-Off and Landing) aircraft. Unless the mysterious TR3B, the Northrop TR3A is the conventional VTOL-aircraft, what is using regular jet engines, but what has the stealth-body.  Image II The thing is that the stealth-reconnaissance aircraft, which uses a similar technology with the Northrop B-2 bomber would be an interesting part of the weapon arsenal. There is a possibility that the TR3A was...