Skip to main content

Diversity guarantees that some companies are surviving in all kinds of economic crises.



The economic environment is like some kind of natural area. The biodiversity guarantees that the forest can continue its growth even if some disease destroys one or two wood species. The same way the idea of biodiversity can use to modeling the economic environment. If the economical infrastructure is too homogeneous the recession in that economical sector causes problems. 

Business diversity guarantees that there is always productive business in the economic area even if one of the business sectors faces a recession. A problem with economics is that if the business is homogenous. The politicians can make the laws for thinking that individual business sector. 

But a too homogenous economical area where all companies are working in the same area is sensitive for the business cycle. And if there is a recession in one sector the business diversity guarantees the tax money from those sectors that are outside the depression. If the entire business environment is operating in one sector that is like putting all eggs into the same basket. 

In some solutions, the business is collected around one big actor. And if that actor falls that causes many bankruptcies around it. In some remote areas, there is a problem that the entire business is working around one actor and that actor makes them depend on themselves. The big actor that operates the center of the cluster is a good client for other business operators or sub-contractors that are offering services for the big or central contractor. 

But the problem is what if the central actor falls? That will pull other corporations with it if they are the central operator's subcontractors. And in those cases is possible that the central contractor is the only client for its subcontractors.

The thing that is bringing money to the economical area is the real interest in the things that are made in that area. Only real customers that are buying services and merchandise are bringing money for the industry. The main problem for the companies is how to make the customers find them and their products. And how to make customers like those things that they will buy those things from that certain company. 

In this case, the service modeling is the key element for making the customers interest in the company and its products. The service should look like something. If the service or other products are not looking like interesting that means nobody comes to buy anything. If the person who selects the product (service or physical merchandise), ever clicked the homepages. That is not bringing money for the company. 

The real interest is the thing that causes probably the positive happening. Which brings money to the cash of the company. The thing is that it's the same for buyers where to buy those goods. But for the seller, that thing is the question of the life and death of the company. 


https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of