Skip to main content

Why does Russian information warfare fail in Ukraine?



What is information warfare? Another name for psychological operations is a lie. The fake news and faked information have based on the idea that telling lies would help own side to get sympathy. 

So in psychological warfare things are told in a way that supports their side. The loss of trust is one way that makes the information operations fail. People should learn that they must be suspicious of all information shared in all kinds of media. Especially if information comes from the conflict area. In conflicts, there is a higher risk of faked information. 

We must remember all the time when we are reading some kind of information that we have a free press in the western world. But the situation is not the same in all nations. There are many countries where journalists are working under the observation of authorities. And in some countries, the laws are making it impossible to criticize governments. 


There are five ways in which psychological operations can fail. 



1) The information that is shared would not reach targets. 


2) People would not just trust information that is shared. 


3) People don't want to see the information. 


4) Information channel, like discussion forum, is hard to reach or it's banned. 


5) Information is not otherwise believable. 


The thing is that the Russians have used fake news all the time. And people might not believe information that Russian official media share anyway. Trust is the key element in information operations. And if the information operator is caught once from lies. That means the trust in the operator is gone for a long time. 

People would not want to see information that makes them feel uncomfortable. The best way to make people avoid information is just to share violent pictures and cheat individual people in those information channels. Also if the channel causes trouble that thing causes that people will start to avoid it. Things like the threat of violence are not making information trusted. One of the details of how to recognize the disinformation group is that they don't tolerate criticism. 

Or another than official opinions are not tolerated. If somebody says something against the official opinion that causes banning. 

That causes the effect that people would not even want to read and see the information that is shared on channels like discussion forums. And if people would feel that the information channel threats them. That thing causes the officials of hosts of the service will block that channel. 

And what is the not believable information? The information has no match in real life. Or the trick images are not made properly. Or it contains some details like some Superman from Marvel comics would come to fight with own troops. 


https://scitechdaily.com/research-exposes-long-term-failure-of-russian-propaganda-in-ukraine/


Image:


https://scitechdaily.com/research-exposes-long-term-failure-of-russian-propaganda-in-ukraine/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of