In the courtroom only facts are important.

In the courtroom only facts are important.

Social media has great power, as we have seen. In cases like a confession of AREA-51, social media had a vital role in the uncovering the secret, what might be bigger than we ever imagined. This case has been shown that the power of social media has a very large role to force the rulers to tell the truth for the people, and also Brexit has shown the force of this way to share opinions and thoughts.

But the thing is that social media has brought one problem in the mind of people. If we think that so-called traditional media would give one-side information of something, we must realize that the great mass of false information has more effect than the small mass of right information, if people are believing that kind of data. The confession is the key in this kind of way to act. If shared data confess people, it's the same, what people shares.

One way to make people silent is to claim that some people have taken to court because of their opinions. In the court is one rule what people must realize. Prosecuted are innocent until they are proven guilty. And proving the prosecuted guilty must happen by using facts, not appealing feelings. This is the thing, what is normally forgotten.

And that is a really interesting thing in social media. When we want to confess to people that our way to think is the only one and right, we must have only persons, who have authority to the system. Then we can use titles, what is not true, and get those "three persons" who can prove the thing, what has been discussed true. The thing is that those things seem very confessing, but then we can see something, what we don't want to see in this hypothetical case.

First thing is that the faculty or area, where professor works is not mentioned. Second, the source, what is used is somehow unique, it has been some lecture or something, and it has happened before digital recordings or recordings of the lecture have somehow destroyed. The third is that there are great feelings about this kind of cases. That thing is seen in the cases when some war criminal has been arrested.

In those cases, the media was full of brutal details what has been done to the victims, but a couple of things have been forgotten. One is the place where those things have been done, and second is the ranks and units, where those criminals served. Those things are really important for the justice system, which must give the judgment. And even if the cases where the crime is well known, the identities of the criminals must be proven, or those prosecuted persons are free to go. Sometimes I have thought that is the handling of war crimes by using brutal details mission to deny people to see those images?

 Well, that thing is a mystery, but the feelings are an extremely good weapon to keep people silent. "I was there myself" is a good argument in media, and "I want to forget". Those things are a good way to close the mouths of the people. We must forget to think about mafia and war criminals some kind of super demons. We must start to think about them as regular criminals, who had great support for their work. When we are handling cases like homicide detectives, we ever ask them to have they ever been battered? This is a really interesting thing to think when we are thinking about investigations and research.

The next there is a small example of about misunderstandings what are connected to Indians. What is the archeologist's relationship with the Mayan culture? Of course, European sociopaths destroyed that nice and famous Indian culture, which ruled the Andes of South America. By the way, Mayan Indians lived in Central America, and their culture was crumbling in when Europeans came. The Indians, who lived in the Andes were Incas and the reason why Pizarro could destroy those people was that Incas were conquered their area, and slaved the other Indians.

That allowed Pizarro to recruit those people in his army. The same thing happened in Central America, where Aztecs slaved other Indians, and then Cortez allowed to use force against Aztecs. But the thing is that the hate was a similar tool in the hands of Conquistadors what it was in the hands of Nazi-Germany and after that Allied forces benefit the hate in their actions. The thing is that crushing other opinions would happen by simply trolling them out from social media.

The second way is to appeal to feelings. If people see something happening that thing has a greater effect than if we would read some reports. If in the court would arrive, some 90 years old woman or man, would the counselor or prosecutors dare to interrogate them with full skills and force. But there is one thing, we can't believe that those old people were young sometimes. We always want to believe that somebody who we might know as the beloved man or woman was monster.

The thing is that the law says that every prosecuted must have the best possible defense. And the thing why defense must be used is that the also prosecuted person must be heard. But the motives have been changed in that kind of cases.

Murder is still murder and serious crime. If the merchandise of the person or the initial capital for business has been earned by using criminal methods, that capital would be returned to the families of victims, and the lawyers would get good profits for those cases. So the lawyer always wins. But the law says that murder can be prosecuted rest of a person's lifetime. This is the thing in law. In the courtroom, the moral has no mean, only facts are things what means something, and the rest of things are meanless. This is the rule in court.

Activism and problems with writings on social media.

Activism and problems with writings on social media.

In the past days, there was a very good way to handle activists, and that thing is that those persons have stamped as the sick. And then the divorcement or kicking off from the working place has been argued by things like depression or some other mental problems that are not tolerated in the working life. The idea has been taken from Nazi Germany, where the mental illness was the reason for arrest and kill people, who had opinions what were not tolerated by the Nazi government, and still in many dictatorial countries the mental illness is the cover for the political arrests and imprisoning. When we are thinking the climate activism, there are many times connected terms like climate angst.

That term has been created for ridiculing people, who have been worked for nature. And in that thing is always connected news, where the people who are been political activists are shown to a public audience as some kind of freaks, who are going to the cold shower. When we are thinking about angst, we might ask what would you think, if you are facing the mocking all day, and what if the windows of your car would be broken all the time, or on your door would be painted the image of the penis? Would you like that thing? Or what would you like that all the times, when you send the E-mail for somebody, people think that those things are good topics for comments like you will face "little accident", while you are fishing in some lake? If that thing feels good, that's it.

Strange detail in the comments, what has given by Greta Thunberg and her fight for the climate, is sometimes there have been the only words the age and Asperger. Those things are looking very interesting like somebody wants to ask that girls parents for taking notice about the actions what this girl has been done. There have also been Tweets that there could happen "accident" on the sea, and those things are a really bad thing.

What if something happens, and the police would see that kind of writings?  There are many people, who would remove the climate activism from media, and the thing what makes this kind of things very embarrassing. The thing is that if we would want to make something about this climate changing, we should abjure something, what is dear for us.

Over a century the car has been the mark of the social position, and it has been a symbol of freedom, but the problem is that most of the carbon dioxide releases come from the traffic. And if we must abjure our right to own car, that means that something more than just the movement equipment has been cut from our life. What kind of life the boss could live, if that person must sit on the next of the ordinary workers?

The car has offered a good shield against so-called working-class people. When the boss is sitting in his city jeep, nobody could ask about the things, like why that boss always roar to the certain henchmen. I know that this kind of things are not the business of henchmen, and they can be divorced. The superiorities don't need to hear the opinions of henchmen, and that's the law. But somebody might talk about that kind of things, and that doesn't feel nice.

But the car has also given many excuses when some person wants to show the position or just flee from working. The excuse for being or staying out from the office would be that somebody has scratched the painting and the car must be taken to a police station and repairment, and if a person doesn't own the car, that problem would not exist.

I have seen similar things somewhere else, and when somebody writes or talks about something, what does not please everybody, there is the text about autism or something else. That thing is quite remarkable because of those kinds of things are something, what is showing something, what is from very deep.

So when we are thinking about children and their opinions, they might look like a little bit naive, but that kind of things are normal, because they don't have life experience. But then we must say that the Earth belongs also for those people, and one thing in climate activism is that we are always thinking that people don't care about the Earth. But they must open their eyes. Sometimes I have seen comments, that some people have not liked my way to write, and they offer the ring around my eye or bury me in the very deep hole.

The thing in carbon dioxide is that it is not a thing like carbage. If I would throw the candy paper to the road, I would get even penalty for that thing. But when some factory releases 20 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide or dumps the waste to the ground, that would seem nothing on television. When we are thinking about carbon dioxide and dumping it to the water system, that thing would turn to carbonic acid. And that thing has the same effect in every water system.

What was the real reason for the Iraqi war?

What was the real reason for the Iraqi war?

One of the reasons for the invasion of Iraq was that Saddam Hussein didn't predict that some people would make suicide attack against the World Trade Center. But that thing was only the last thing of the series of actions, what caused the allied invasion to Iraq, or at least gave the reason for the attack.

Many times I have written that there were many, so-called real reasons for that war. One of those reasons was that Saddam Hussein openly opposed the resolution of the United Nations Security Council, what was under the scrip by all members of the Security Council, what has the veto right. And that was a very bad thing for the authority of the United Nations and so-called superpowers. Also, the acts of formed Yugoslavia military forces in the Yugoslavian war forced the United Nations to authorize the military actions against Iraqi.

But there were also many other reasons, and one was that the United States wanted to demonstrate the effects of its weapons and that means that the international weapons trade was the major reason why allied forces attacked Iraq. The thing is that if we are thinking about what was the so-called real reasons for that operations, we must say that the war was the quantum of solace. When Saddam Hussein simultaneously broke the orders, what came from the United Nations, and then the political atmosphere in the United States turned to support the military actions because of the 9/11 attacks.

The thing that Saddam Hussein gave support for Osama Bin Laden along with the actions, what that man ordered before those suicide attacks against the World Trade Center and Pentagon justified the USA offensive military action against Iraqi. The thing was that Saddam Hussein miscalculated the U.S government and the nations will of attack against Iraq caused the attack. The thing is that maybe Saddam didn't know what were the plans of the Al Qaida, and he believed that the Al Qaida was followed the orders of the Taliban and mullah Muammar Omar.

And if Saddam Hussein discussed only with Omar, that attack to the USA would come as surprise. The demonstrations, where people show support for those terrorists caused hate and then the political atmosphere turned for supporting the attack against Saddam Hussein, and because the money for the war would get back from Iraq by the contracts of rebuilding and benefiting the oil of that country, the political support for the offensive military action for Iraq were guaranteed.

Because of the anti-militaristic movement of the USA Saddam Hussein thought, that he could deny the United Nations inspections to the chemical plants and nuclear laboratories. And then the world would forget that Iraq attacked against Kuwait about ten years before the second Iraqi war. Saddam Hussein thought that being silent, and playing some games, the flight prohibition zones in the Iraqi airspace have not stayed longer, and then that man wanted to take his revenge.

Or this is how normal people believe that the road went to the second conflict. But the thing is that the problem in that area is that it has been a very good zone for introducing military equipment, and also the money feels good in the pockets of Russia, what also wants to sell weapons to that area. And also if the Russian missiles and aircraft would be effective, the success against Western aircraft and other equipment would be good marketing for those products.

And also otherwise Western military manufacturers want to sell their products for the nations, who are attacked by the Russian equipment. The problem is that even the weapon selling to the countries, what are at war, the thing is that those orders are simultaneously broken, and if the orders are not followed by some military exporters, they have not to effect at all. The thing is that the Middle East is the area, where military manufacturers can test their newest and deadliest technology against real targets. That thing is causing the civilian casualties, but the truth is that in countries like Jemen, the actors are Arabs, and that makes difficult to justify somebody.

The weapons that are used are American made, but the users were Arabs and that thing causes many problems in the justification. The Russian military has used very strong firepower in Syria, and that thing is a little bit embarrassing for many people, who normally blame the USA because of the actors in the conflicts are other countries. And that makes impossible to justify the USA alone, even if the weapons that are used were made in the USA, the thing is that the enemies are justified as terrorists.

This thing is really bad, and embarrassing also for the coalition and weapon sellers, what are looking at the civilian victims from the TV. And the thing is that many Arab nations like Saudi-Arabia use mercenary soldiers for flying their aircraft, which is effective, but the thing who gives orders to those pilots is hidden from the public audience.

The political culture and use of power

The political culture and use of power

The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things. This is the thing, what we must remember when we are talking about the way to rule the nation. If every people in the country supports the leaders, in every state, would have democracy. But why western democracies are supporting dictators?

This is a good question, and the thing is that dictatorial government are a good way to turn attention away from internal politics. If somebody goes worse than in our country, why people should complain? And if people would get too much salary, that thing means, that the production must transfer to some far-east countries, which are also suitable enemies for the western world, because they are far away from us.

Who cares about the conditions, where those people live, because of their national firewall denies the information, what comes from that country. And there are tales that western companies have delivered the firewall technology to those governments for denying the delivering the unpleasing information of the human rights in those countries. What people can't see does not exist is the idea of censorship. And that's why the benefit of some companies might be that people cannot see where those products or their materials are made.

Sooner or later every person in the world must tell the opinions about things like democracy and ruling the nation. This is the thing in every sector of life. Economic leaders must say, do they want to support the political systems, what are against the benefit of the nation and ordinary people.

When we are thinking about the reason, what many rulers have used when they are "forgotten" the next elections is that they are making their nation great. But then somebody would ask, what is the definition for the nation? If normal people are living below the limit of the poor, we must realize that there is something wrong with that state. When we are talking about the regular or average salaries of the state, we must realize that there are two ways to calculate those things.

One is that every salary type in the state would list in the line and that brings the average salary, what is a little bit different than the real economic situation in that nation. This way to make statistics is very impressive, but it is forgotten one thing, and that is how many people would get each class of salary. The thing is that the ruling class, which represents only a couple of percent of citizens can get billions of dollars, and the rest of the people are eating their shoes.

This is a provocative example of the thing, what is called as the growing difference between the incomes. But many times the GNP is mentioned the good method to tell the world, how wealthy the nation or its economy is. That thing tells about how much each nation would earn, and that thing is a really interesting number. When we are thinking about GNP that tells only how much the nation earns per citizen. But it would not tell who will get most of the money, and it would not tell, how much each nation pays to other countries.

This means that most of the national income might come from foreign companies and investors, which seems a very good thing. But then that nation can buy foreign military material and most of the income might go back to foreign hands.

Or otherwise, those states could sell their waterworks to foreign investors and then return all their money to foreign countries. Otherwise, GNP is not telling, who exactly is earning the money of some nations, and that means that the distribution of the incomings is not seen in the statistics, what is always telling about GNP. Another way to tell people is that the economic situation in the state is good is telling, how much or rather a way to say, what is the percent of unemployed people.

That thing is a very good meter about the competitiveness of the companies, which operates in some nation. But the thing, what is missing from those statistics is how many people are in pension, and the thing what would be nice to see is, has that country the way to handle unemployment just to put them in the pension or to works, where they don't get salaries? That thing is a really good way to make statistics looking good. If a person would not get a job, would that inmate send to some"institute" for retraining, and that's a good answer for many problems.

Bad economic situations somehow justify that companies are telling that they must decrease salaries, but the high percentage of unemployed people means that companies have the freedom to select workers freely because there are more offenders for jobs. And that will be a good way to keep people silent, because if somebody talks against the employer, would that mean, that the job of that person would be seen more careful than before.

If we are thinking about the one-party governments, the best thing, what those governments can hope is that people are making 12 hours working days. Too much free time makes possible to agitate against the government and it's a way to rule the nation, and also the long working day will keep people out from social media. That allows companies to deny the delivering information, which is not meant to tell for great public. The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things, as I wrote at the beginning of this text.

Western World and problematic relationship with China

Western World and problematic relationship with China

China is the biggest economic area in the world and that makes it very good and wanted trade company, but there is one problem with that nation. The one-party system and the governments' attitude to freedoms of speech and other democratic things are causing problems with the relationship with that country and other nations.

When we are thinking about the riots or protests in Hong Kong and political arrests of that country, those things could be easy to keep away from the public, but the Social media like Twitter and other solutions causes, that information flees from authorities. The problem is that authorities have no time to search every single E-mail, and the foreign companies must have access to communicate over the national firewall.

But even if China would be closed, the memory cards are easy to carry out from the country, and that data can be published in the social media, and the thing what makes that kind of actions very hard to control is that those names, what is used in those social media accounts and homepages can look like normal western names. So the authorities cannot find out, that behind those accounts is some Chinese people. The problem with that kind of things is that the persons, who are taking apart of that kind of things are using the same methods, what the Russian and Chinese government uses in their propaganda campaigns.

The thing in those social media accounts is that they can be used to deny the western company leaders entrance to China, and the system works that the normal social media account is opened for the name of the director or journalist. Then somebody starts to publish the information, what might damage the relationship with that country and China, and the official truth goes.

The things like supporting the opposition might cause the denying of the visa, and that means the factory must establish to some other country. The thing why the Chinese government wants to get western technological industry in their country is that they wish to get the same time access to the western electronic components, what they can use for the surveillance operations.

This kinds of things are necessary for the new kind of weapon aiming and other kinds of systems, which can be used for tracking people. The thing is that information is a powerful weapon, and that makes the complicated world even more complicated than ever before.

The thing is that leaders in the democratic world must listen, people, who are giving votes to them. If they are not pleased the voters, the place in the parliament goes to some other person, and that means that the pictures of the riots and use of force are not looking good in media, and sooner or later so-called official media must say something about the images, where tanks are standing against protesters.

Far wing movements, cheaters and social media

Far wing movements, cheaters and social media

In the real world, everyone can create the account to social media, and that makes them interesting but at the same time, somehow dangerous places to hang. And that's why some people are recommending another to leave those places, or there would be some consequences. That thing is quite sad, because do you want to leave those places to the far-left and far-right movements and members of some anarchists, whose agenda is straight from some Viking-era?

The thing is that there have been many tales about that far wing persons would leave other people alone if they would keep their mouth shut. But do you believe that is true? When we are talking about neutrality about the media, we must realize that there is no possibility of being neutral. Also, most professional reporters and journalists have their political and other opinions. The press houses have also owners, who are making decisions about publications.

And also the great social media actors have financial and political backgrounds. That means that there is a possibility that everyone can open the social media account in the name of some prime minister or some other people like businessmen. This kind of things is great to know because disinformation is a very good way to make money.

We all know that nobody has accounts in every social media service. And those services like Facebook and Vkonte are very good tools to make inner circle trade in stock marketing, so if that kind of things is slipping in publicity, the results can be devastating. But the thing what makes social media very complicated tool is that every person in the world can open the account as playing the role as the member of the Rockefeller's family. And then deliver disinformation about some investments, what are the product of imagination. 

Would you believe that the local gang members would be nicer if they would not be mentioned in some writing? There are many times seen, what the silence has been made for the neighborhoods. If the people are nice to gangs, they would let them grow to power. Why people should be silent if their cars have been broken, or the service, what they have paid has not given?

I think that those actors, who have made those damages would continue their service as before. Or have you ever hear that the security guards, who have nicely ordered people move to the outer area without any reason would say that they are sorry?

The thing is that the internet is full of actors, who are telling that they would stop the pressure or violent actions would stop if people are keeping their mouth shut. But the thing is that those persons would continue their actions, and they are done that kind of things before social media. So this tells people, would those people stop cheating, if people would follow their instructions to keep their mouth shut?

The mass shooters and their political agenda

The mass shooters and their political agenda

Mass shooters have not political agenda and the thing why they are doing their things might cause that those persons had deep hallucinations. If the person uses drugs like cocaine or amphetamine and the anabolic steroids they might not able to handle their violence.

Also, if the person is under the influence of drugs, alcohol and other chemical stimulants, the touch with realities might be lost.  That means that those people might think, that they are part of some great international revolutionary movement, what is fighting against Trump government.

The thing is that those people might have some kind of sympathy for the so-called "white power movement", that means people, who are believing the superiority of the white race. The "white power" movement is not identical and one single organization. Those people might have only one thing, what connects them, and that is hate against black people and the government.

Those people are believing that the weapons and power justify their actions, and as we have seen there are people, who are supporting the "white race" and racist movements in the far left and far right. That means that also left-wing radicals might not tolerate minorities, and the thing is that "white power" society is saying that the government is giving unnecessary limits to national rights. So they are believing anarchism. The thing is that when the shooter represents the major white citizens, that is always a problematic thing. 

And that is because of politicians and other persons, who want to get benefit from those cases cannot prosecute minorities in the cases of the shootings. Nobody wants to lose the votes by starting to persecute the majorities. Also, there have been claiming, that the authorities are protecting and supporting the far-right nationalists or anarchist nationalists, who are claiming to be less violent than far-left anarchists.

So there have been found the stories, that the mass-shooter would be a member of some Antifa-movement. One of those sources has been the social media account, where is of course not name or identification data of the shooter. But there are images, what claimes to portray shooter, and the tales about rapings and another kind of plans. And of course, that account is deleted, that nobody has seen those pictures.

Here I'm remembering that there were three shootings in the USA, and why the media is talking only one shooting? What makes it so special? Why the two other shootings have got so much publicity, what this one, where the guilty is claimed to be the left-wing radical?

Now we are hearing that the mass shooter has been used amphetamine-base psychiatric medicine, and supported far-left movements. So this is the normal way to say, that the person was a drug addict, and that inmate should even ever get the gun in hands. And this is the major thing in many mass shootings in the USA and the entire world. The person who has used some psychiatric medicine for wrong purposes is dangerous, and also people, who have used drugs like cocaine or crack might be very dangerous.

The thing in the drugs is that they are causing hallucinations and believing that the person might think to be some great international organizations. Those international organizations might be things, what are between ears of those people, and the thing is that narcotic addict would not separate the realities from the hallucinations. And those things make them dangerous.

Why artificial intelligence is a necessary tool for nanotechnology?

Why artificial intelligence is a necessary tool for nanotechnology?

In nanotechnology, the system consists probably billions or particles, which are operating together. Those particles are extremely small, and they must operate together. If we think that human operators must follow every each of those particles, we would be trouble.

The idea of nanomachines is that they are artificial molecules, which are based on the carbon chain, where are connected other atoms like chlorine, iron or silicon. Transferring and forming those molecules happens by using magnetic fields or laser rays. The idea is that those extremely small machines are not making things alone, but there is power in groups.

And the groups of those machines could be even billions of particles, what should put in the right places. And in this kind of actions, the computer is an ultimate tool. The computer can calculate every each laser or another electromagnetic radiation impulse at a certain time, and it can calculate the dose of the radiation in the exactly right level and length.

The thing is that some nanomachines are extremely unstable molecules, where the carbon chain is connected to complicated enzymes or proteins, what is cut off in a certain place and chemical environment. So the system must use exactly the right force when it operates those molecules. The thing in nanomachines is that they must produce in an exactly right chemical environment and temperature.

Also in those chambers, the level of ultraviolet and other radiation must be exactly right. When those machines are transferred to target, the system must transfer them by using exactly the right force. The thing is that nanomachines are entirety, where billions of particles are operating together, and that means that the system must control the whole structure.

When we are thinking about the situation, where nanomachines are used as medical use, like destroying cancer cells or viruses in the human body, the machines can take exactly the right place. The idea is that those machines would make holes in the protein core of those cells, or they will cut the DNA or RNA of viruses.

But if those systems are operating the wrong way, the results could be destructive. Some of those nanotechnical cytostatics are ricin molecules, what mission is to destroy the mitochondria of those cells. And the thing is that only one ricin molecule can kill human if that molecule can destroy the mitochondria in one cell, what starts to die.

So the doctors must control that molecule, and the idea is to create cytostatics, what can neutralize very easily by using things like UV-light, what will cut that molecule in pieces. That light can take in blood veins by using a catheter, what is connected to the optical fiber. The idea is that the nanomachines can search and destroy even the single cancer cells in the human body.

But they can make many other things, like isolate harmful chemicals, and one of the most fascinating areas, where nanomachines can operate is the human nervous system, where those molecules can remove plack from the neurons. That can be a cure for Alzheimer patients. But the problem is that those nanomachines must take in the right place and then they must act the exactly right way. If they operate the wrong way, the destruction would be massive.

Those machines could look like dough wheels, and they can just remove the plack by using mechanic force, but controlling those machines would be very difficult. The idea could be that the nanomachines would be packed in the protein package, what can be the core of emptied bacteria.

After that, they would take to the exact right point, and then those machined can be released, destroying that miniature bag. Then the star or Morgenstern looking molecule, where is the iron bites at the outer layer put to rotate by using magnet field, and that movement would clean those synopses.

Read this...

https://donmesswiththis.blogspot.com/p/beware-fake-moderators.html

One little writing about pyramids and chemtrails

One little writing about pyramids and chemtrails

There are many movies on the Internet, which are considering about pyramids and chemtrails. And when we are talking about real facts about pyramid structures, we must remember that the air is flowing up by following the walls of the pyramids. This will clean the air because the bacteria and mushrooms are flying away from the space, and rising air would deny micro-organisms entry to that structure.

This works, if there is a hole on the top of the structure. But when we are looking at the purpose of pyramids, the mission of that structure has a connection with the ancient Egyptian religion, and those people believed that the soul of the pharaoh would fly to heaven, but of course, those structures might be used also for secret meetings and other things.

The ancient Egyptians had no problem to get workers to the building site of pyramids because every Egyptian had a duty to take apart in those projects, and the Pharaoh would introduce the name of hard workers to the Amon, the god of the Sun. Also, the method what was used in those buildings is known, and the thing is that inclined planes and muscle-used cranes were in use in those building sites. 

The Egyptians began the building of pyramids right after the birth of  Pharaoh, and when the power in society changed, the next pharaoh chose the pyramid, what was the most pleasant for him as the grave. In Ancient Egypt was the proto-pyramids, what were placed on the holy points on Earth, and then the new pharaoh chose one of those, what began to build.

But when we are thinking about the purpose of pyramids, there have been introduced many theories. One is that the chamber was filled with phosgene, what was created by putting grass to the anaerobic chamber, and if the lower chamber of the great pyramid was exploded methane that would cause the destructive gas what would travel across the King's valley.


Also, there has been introduced theories that the mushroom, what would turn deadly in anaerobic conditions have been grown in those chambers. But the thing is that the great pyramid might be convented to that purpose later. There are many stories, that the final mystery of the pyramids have been solved, and maybe those persons might interest, that the purpose of the pyramids might be changed during history.

When we are thinking about the real purpose of pyramids, I am not ancient Egyptian. And that means that we cannot even know the purpose of the entire building. 

But the thing is that we know the purpose of one part of the pyramid. And that part is the upper door, where is seen the Sirius in the certain day in the year. The purpose of that door is to tell that it's the day of the beginning of the insemination. The thing is that the door to the pyramid, which shows the moment when Sirius rises is easy to make.

The priest or construction foremen must only put the wooden frame to a certain position in the certain day of the year, and then that door or entrance can be done by following the angle of the frame. This thing is made for the memory for the priests that they remember the day, when Sirius, or "Dog's star" would raise and that was the mark that the River Nile starts to flood, and that was the mark for beginning the insemination, that the entire population of Egypt could be feed.

And at least the chemtrails...

Another thing about theories is consisting of chemtrails. The chemtrails are the thing, what some aircraft are leaving behind them. Those chemtrails are claimed to involve extremely small RFID sensors, which can uncover if the people are in the wrong area.

But they can also be meant for telling some governmental offices that if some fuel combinations, what is prohibited to transport to some countries are unauthorized loaded to some aircraft. This kind of things can be made for making sure that some chemical combinations are not transferred to the unauthorized countries or those little sensors can uncover if some unauthorized person has been in the wrong area.

A little tale about bitcoin.

A little tale about bitcoin.

Do you know what is the Bitcoin? That is the virtual currency, which acts like real currency, but it is more like a share. The biggest difference between regular currencies and bitcoins is that the bitcoin is created by some private corporation like a bank, and it can be used only at the internal payments of the corporation. The thing with the bitcoins is that they can be used also with payments between corporations.

But that needs special contracts for those payments, and in those contracts should determine the value of bitcoin to regular or governmental currencies. The difference between bitcoin and normal currency is that sending bitcoin over the national border doesn't need permission or make reports. The transaction by using bitcoin happens by the way, that the person would buy bitcoin from the operator, who will send that currency to the receiver.

The bitcoin can be text message or PDF, where is a certain control number. And then the real money can send later or the sender can just open the bank account to the receiver, that this person can pay things by using that account, but that needs very high-level trust if that thing would be done. If someone misuses that kind of trust, the damages would be very high. And I don't know how legal this kind of things are, so ask your lawyer, before you do anything, what I have written in here in practice.

Because if this thing is illegal, that can cause legal actions and even send the actor to the jail. The Internet is full of stories about applications, which should make the user rich. Those applications base the idea that artificial intelligence would compile the prizes of virtual currencies, and then they just buy and sell that thing, what would make money by using that data. 

The thing is that artificial intelligence can do it actually by a very interesting way, and it probably follows the Internet traffic, or exactly the TCP/IP transmitting, and when the certain server would send the TCP/IP protocols "Echo-request" message, the artificial intelligence would send the order to sell or buy some virtual currency. The idea is similar to electronic intelligence systems, what mission is to predict the attack of the enemy. The system has collected information about the network transmit, and then it has compiled, what kind of transmitting happens before somebody buys or sells the virtual currency.

Then this data has been given to algorithm, what is waiting for its victim in the router. If the signature of the transmission is similar to the files, what is predicting the transaction, the algorithm can also send a message to its server to start to buy or sell some bitcoins or any other virtual currency. This thing would give this kind of software able to make very much money. The idea of this kind of way to make money is the prediction. And how to get information about the payments and plans to buy or sell that kind of currency.

Dogs and intelligence

Dogs and intelligence

Dogs are the best friends of human beings. Below this text is a video of the smartest dogs in the world. This dog can learn 1000 words and this kind of tests have been done by using the names of objects. And the dog could find all of those objects and actions, what the trainer has been taught to it.

This dog is mentioned being the smartest dog on Earth, and that Border Collie what looks a little bit "Laika dog" what was the first organism, what flew around the world in space capsule Sputnik II. The thing is that this kind of animals is used for tests, where is tested the animal's ability to learn things. This kind of method, where the dog is taught words by showing one object after another is used to create things, what allows people to learn things younger and younger.

Also, those methods are used with handicapped persons and advancing the research of machine learning. There are rumors about tests, where the pineal gland of the dogs are changed to organ, what is taken from higher species like monkeys. That thing has been made for testing the influence of pineal gland to the intelligence of animals and people.

When we are thinking about the methods of teaching dogs, the most important thing is to keep calm and relaxing during the teaching process. That means that the teaching will base the same thing what Ivan Pavlov created in the late 19th. century. That method is that the well-done job would be gifted by giving cookies or something other things. The method is motivating the dog to make things better, and in this process, the object is simply shown to the dog, and then it would be shown what to do with it. 

Do you know that memory marks of the dogs are researched? The idea is that the voices or images have been shown to a dog and its reactions have been followed by approximately, or there can be used the things like detectors, what are following the neural reactions of the dog. If the dog has been a stressful situation, and the voices or images, what have been connected to that case would be heard or seen again, that would cause the psychophysical reaction.

So if the dog hears the voice of the person, who has hurt its master it would react immediately. Also if some product causes the pain to it, it would react very strongly, if it sees that product or person, who has caused that pain again. So this kind of information is important for investigators when they are looking for criminals and other things.

One of the most interesting things is that if dogs have been in the space capsule, the researchers can make a copy of the cockpit of the capsule by using technology, where is used sharpening images. At first, the researcher would use sound what is recorded in a space capsule to find out, if the dog has been in that place. Then the researcher would use color, and then to the image would involve shape, then lines and after that, the image will be made sharper and sharper. This kind of tests has been used to create a base for tracking people like domestic violators and drug dealers.

The situation has been stressful, and the researcher would follow the neuropsychological reactions of the dog, and when the image would transform to look more and more looking like the place, where the stress has happened, the neurophysiological reactions will become stronger and stronger. So this is one of the most important things to know when violent persons or people who have grown fighting dogs have been tracked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omaHv5sxiFI

Why Russian agents attacked Skribal?

Why Russian agents attacked Skribal?

Trump has ordered new sanctions against Russia because of the Novochoke-case, where 5 persons were injured, and two of them were dead. Attackers have been claimed to being high-ranking GRU officials or at least another one has ranked as colonel, if we would believe about Wikipedia in this case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Sergei_and_Yulia_Skripal

The attack against Sergei Skribal is a very complicated thing. The attackers used poison, which connects the case straight to the Russian government. And the men who made that strike were recognized to GRU agents. Those things, unfortunately, show that the person, who is behind that attentate is working in the Russian government. This Skripal attentate has similarities with the Polonium-murder, where the ex-KGB agent has been murdered by using Polonium-210, which is very highly radioactive material.

And there are two possibilities. One of them is that the Russian government is behind those cases or the Russian laboratories would have security leak. If those materials like Novichoke and Polonium would get to wrong hands, the results will be devastating.

This is a very interesting thing, which has damaged the relationship between Russia and the Western World. And the thing is that even if the Russian government confess that it has nothing to do with that crime, the actors, in this case, were identified and easy to connect with the crime.

This is the thing, what wonders me. Why those men used poison named "Novichoke"? And why they didn't even try to hide their tracks? Did Russians or the persons, who were behind that action think, that the nobody even dares to say a thing about this case?

When we are thinking about the weapons that were used, we must ask, why those killers didn't choose assault rifles or some normal poison like Ricin? Those things could not so easily be connected to the Russian authorities? This kind of actions is really bad for the reputation of any government in the world. So who gave orders about this strike? Those people, who made this crime didn't operate by their motion.

If those murders would be done by using the assault rifle, that thing could be explained about the personal revenge against Skripal. In that case, the killer could claim that Skribal has made something to self while that man worked in KGB, and then the thing would not so easy to connect to the Russian government.

Sometimes when I think about the relationship, what KGB had to power, there could be persons even in the highest positions in Russian security and governmental authorities would be found men and women, whose career that service destroyed during Soviet era. Those people might have the opportunity to hide their past when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

So could there some person, who has something hidden in the past, what has something to do with Skripal? This kind of things are very important things and this kind of cases must be solved because if some government kills people, who are against its policy, must the other nations give a signal that this kind of things is not tolerated. And if the hardcore killing chemicals and radioactive material can be stolen from the laboratories, that thing can cause risk for many people.

Can we create robots or computers that are more intelligent than humans? And would we need those systems for travel to distant words like icy moons of Neptune?

Can we create robots or computers that are more intelligent than humans? And would we need those systems for travel to distant words like icy moons of Neptune? 

This question is very interesting because we can connect the human-shaped or even bug-sized robot to the supercomputers by using mobile data connection and outsourcing the calculation capacities will give the ability to give even the smallest robots very sophisticated abilities. If we think the ability to connect the robots straight to human brains by using EEG-bandanas, we can think the case.

That the system would consist of the ability to connect human brains to the same interface, what allows remote-system controls the field-operating robots, that would give the robot more brain capacity than humans. And this thing has given ideas to the robots like "Data" in "Star Trek" movies.

Those robots would look like very emotional, but they would be the part of the craft"s central computer system. That device would communicate with the crew, but there might be some other missions of that machine. There has been introduced one of the most extraordinary things about the purpose of that kind of hypothetical robots. And that is the robot would act as the pineal gland for the central computer. The idea is that the robot itself is highly sophisticated microprocessor what communicates with the memory blocks of the craft.

And this kind of things would be interesting when we are thinking about a hybrid computer system, where the central computer would operate with a robot. This kind of systems might look like basically trucks. In the roller-coaster would be the central computer, what communicates with the human-shape robot, what will operate as a driver. A similar system might also installed in the normal-looking houses. This kind of ideas can be used as the base for ideas to send human-shaped robots to other planets.

Those particles or targets for intelligent space probes could be extremely cold moons of the distant planets. 

The idea is similar in many cases. The human-shaped robot can operate separately from the platform, where are the central computers. And also the system might get assistance for computing from the satellites and super-computers, what are on the Earth. The system might use many sensors for modeling the environment, and one of those systems is laser-scanner, which would model the area very effectively.

If the system operates on some icy moon, the quadcopters would use the frozen gas for the propellant of the rocket engines. The system might break water molecules or it can boil hydrocarbon or nitrogen ice by using electric arc. And this would make possible to fly above those distant and icy worlds like moons of Saturn or Neptune. 

Also, that robot would operate with quadcopters, what will scan areas, what is invisible for the robot itself. The operators, who are working with supercomputers, and the super simulations would use this model for creating the routes for those robots. When we are thinking about the form of this kind of robot or robot group, it might look like some kind of jeep and the human-shaped robots could walk around it.

The computers would be networked the human-shaped robots and the central computer, what locates in the jeep-shaped vehicle. That combination can send the "humanoid robots" to search for things like cliffs. And if those systems are operating on the planets, where are not life forms but there is an atmosphere, all of the parts of those systems might use nuclear power.

But if there is not the atmosphere, but there is water, the quadcopters could create oxygen and hydrogen for rocket motors by using electrolysis. In those cases, the system would take the bite of ice and melt it in the electrolysis chamber. Also, there have been ideas that if the ice is forming by some gasses like frozen nitrogen or hydrocarbon the system might use electric arcs for steaming that material, and that would make the probes fly above frozen worlds of the distant moons.

How to make artificial intelligence, and why this kind of things are so hard to create in practice.

(Wikipedia)

How to make artificial intelligence, and why this kind of things are so hard to create in practice. 

Even the best artificial intelligence solution is only the large database, where are lots of actions recorded. And when the artificial intelligence needs to do something new, the new action must be programmed by a human operator. The making of the database would take an extremely long time if we want to create a sophisticated database, where are lots of answers in multiple problems. And making those solutions is very hard to create because every single action needs to program separately. When we are thinking about a chess computer, that program would just calculate an extremely large number of movements on the chessboard.

The thing is that on the chessboard is a limited number of possible movements and the computer must just calculate them all. That makes it effective. And then the programmer must find out, what is the most effective first movement and program that movement to the program. Then it can calculate every single movement and counter movement, what the opponent can make. And of course, the terms like "mate" and the strategic object of the game must be programmed.

This is the problem to create artificial intelligence. The thing that every each action must record to the database separately is taking time. The thing with this kind of artificial intelligence is that the creation of this kind of systems is similar work with making statistics. 

Statistics is an effective tool for finding out things like the political opinions of some group. The tools for statistical analysis are simple. Only thing, what is needed is Excel or some other similar program. But collecting the data to those sheets is the thing, what takes most of the work. The same thing is with the robot, which uses artificial intelligence. 

Every single movement must record to that robot separately, and of course, there must be found some connection with the command and some action. Let's take one simple example of that thing. If the programmer wants to teach commands like "take me a newspaper". The thing seems a very easy process. But when the programmer wants to make that thing, every part of the command must teach separately. 

When the actions for the command is described the creator must describe, what is the newspaper, where it can be found, and what to do if the newspaper is not found from that particular place? The thing is that if this part of the program, what is called " the error correction" is not made, the program can be locked or stoned because the event handler cannot find matches between the input, what is taken from sensors and the action, what is stored in a database. 

The teaching of the computer of the robot must happen by using the same method what is used with children, and the operator would use the command to console, and then walk with the robot to the place, and then make what should be done. And remember that "get" is the first part of the command. 

Then the next command would be the object, what must be taken. And then the action, what must be done after that. But if the robot would not find the newspaper, it can report that thing to the controller, and if the controller would say, look it from the table. 

This kind of command means that robot would search the table, what is in kitchen and if it would not still find it, that machine would go to the living room and then it would systematically search those things from every room and every table. The thing is that the order of those rooms and the layout of the house has been programmed in the memory of the robot. 

If we think that somewhere in Universe the robots, what are equipped with artificial intelligence would start to create a new civilization, we would think that maybe they would act like ants or wasps. They would create spacecraft, which also operates as the autonomous factor, what can create other robots. 

This particular unit will have the same role with the ant queen, and it would create a new base on the planet, what it can use as the same way as ants use their nest in nature. In some vision, the robot civilization would start to create city-looking structures when they are spreading across the universe. The purpose of the city would be to act as a trap for organic civilizations. The thing what computers need is the mind of the living organisms. The problem with the computer is that they are not able to create any abstractions. So they don't have imagination at all.

The natural-looking recon drones

The natural-looking recon drones

Have you noticed that some hoverflies are like searching for the ID-papers? Of course, this is only a coincidence, that when some person keeps the wallet open, there would come the hoverfly to look for the place, where it can put its eggs. But the new kind of nano-drones or robot bugs might make this kind of things, and the thing is that those drones might look like real bugs.

YouTube and the Internet are full of stories about nanorobots, what are looking like mosquitos, but if I would create recon drone, what can operate undercover, I would choose some other bug than a mosquito. That form should be something, what is not tempt people to damage drone by slapping it with newspaper, and that's why hoverflies or dragonflies would be more suitable for that purpose. The thing is that the small-size drones have limited computing capacity, but they can operate as swarms.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z78mgfKprdg

That means the drone can be remotely connected with the central computer, and the transmitter would not need to be so powerful, as people normally think. This kind of nanotechnical drones can make row to the central computer, that they can communicate from long distances. And they can use lasers or some other optical communication systems for command messages, which makes them very difficult to detect. 

In this solution, the communication would happen from the drone to another, and the small-size drones can get their electricity from high-power radio transmitters, like high power OTH-radars. That allows them to operate unseen and they can collect data from every each person, what is targeted to them.

And those drones are extremely difficult to find. They can communicate with their command center by using the same data transmitters, which are used in the mobile telephones. Those operators can sit in the command center at another side of Earth, or they can work in the operational field. The communication can happen with blue tooth or every other data communication solution.

This would allow the operator to use their mobile telephones antenna for data communication between themselves and drone swarm. Those small drones can make many things, like take the samples of tissue of some people. They can also observe rooms, and collect the data from the WLAN systems. But those drones can also be used to follow the behavior of natural animals, and they can search people from some area. 

Drone-swarms can cover a very large area, and even if they have limited equipment, the large mass of them replaces the quality. That means that every each drone might have different sensors, and they can produce in the operational area. In this that the cores of the drones can put in the small robot unit, which puts the necessary sensor in them.

This supply unit can install in the helicopter, and there could be many types of sensors, which can put in those drones. That equipment could be radio-active or chemical detectors or even the ricin injectors for assassination missions. And this kind of things makes those drones extremely dangerous. They are cheap to produce in the automatized factories, and they are unseen.

Could the newest school of thoughts of philosophy named "Astrophilosophy"?

Could the newest school of thoughts of philosophy named "Astrophilosophy"?

When somebody is talking about futurology, what is science that research people relationship with technological advantages and their influence on society, we must realize, that there are many similarities with the writing of novels. Nobody has seen future, or at least nobody ever has given any prove about, what is happening in the future, or what kind of advantages there will be in far after the hundreds or thousands of years. And that's why people would sometimes call the futurology as "Astrophilosophy". That thing would consist of the thought about hypothetical space colonies and travel to other solar systems.

Astrophilosophy would be similar than the philosophy of state or "Platonism". It would handle the human and our society's relationship with astronomy and the universe. What would be right, and what would be wrong, when we would start to colonize the universe. Things like protecting nature on some planet, which is dangerous for us, but what might be the level of bacteria is an interesting way to think about the conquering space.

Or if we would someday force to leave our home planet Earth, have we right to enter the young solar system, and sterilize some of it's planets to our new home? And if we would force to leave Earth, and it would happen because of pollution, would we let the same thing continue in the new home planet? This kind of things might be interesting to think before we would start to create new colonies in the Universe.

When we are creating new colonies, we must realize, that we should also give them something. If they are the only side, what gives things, that would mean that this colony would cut the relationship to Earth. When we would create colonies, the persons who would send to that mission would be most intelligent and perfectly trained. 

But if the journey would take hundreds or thousands of years, the colonialists would be born children, who have not even seen or hear Earth. And that would make social pressures to the relationship between Earth and it's hypothetical civilizations, but the problem is that those civilizations would turn aliens to Earth on together. And the thing is that maybe Earth would not in those visions be the number one, and it would turn to one of the colonies, or in the worst visions worse than average colonies.

The thing is that those highly intelligent persons could start to manipulate their abilities, and that means that they might turn to very highly intelligent, and also they can adapt themselves to new environments. And those environments could be different kind of places than Earth. Those colonies might start to send their colonialists to other planets, and they would not even tell that thing to Earth.

And why they should do that thing? Those hypothetical colonies might communicate with Earth from hundreds of light-years. That thing might take too long for communication. Then the colony would start to live it's own life away from the Earth.

When I wrote this text one thing brought to my head. And that thing is why when youngsters would write things like this, they are using their imaginations. But when elder people are thinking and writing this kind of things, they are making theories.

This is a thing, what makes me sometimes think, how many good writers could have lost because people attitude is that they are childish. When we are thinking about novels and writings, what are created by some writer, we can say, that many of them are still a theory. But why only elder people are making theories? This is a very interesting question. And sometimes people would think that the people who will write about their thoughts are some kind of autistic. That thing is a really interesting way to think.

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

Philosophical schools of thoughts are many times mentioned in the biographies of philosophers. There are found many interesting schools of thoughts, like Neoplatonists, Leipzigeans, Modern German and many more ways to think about things. There is seen many very good ideas, how to put those persons in the boxes, where people can choose, what school of thoughts of philosophy would the philosopher advocate.

And this kind of things are good looking, but if the philosopher self should put self to some of those boxes, that thing would be really difficult. If there would be the allowance to become a philosopher, what depends on the knowledge, what shool advocator the philosopher would be, there would be no philosopher on Earth, who would not have peptic ulcer or who even wrote a single word.

When we are thinking about things like putting people to boxes, that thing would be a nice way to destroy the interest of philosophy in the beginning. Those things like classes of philosophers make studies very hard, and very complicated. And one thing, what people might not understand is that the thing in philosophy is to teach a person to think own thoughts.

Not copy other people thoughts. Even a child can make copies of texts, and in that case, the person must not even understand a thing. I don't speak languages like Japan, but I could copy texts if I can copy marks from one place to another, and I must not understand a thing about that. 

Sometimes some people asked me when I started to write, whose thoughts I will write. In those cases, I don't care a thing, what other people thought. But when some person, who knows everything better than I come to ask things like that, they should tell, what that kind of things are meaning to them? Who cares, who have written those words?

When we are thinking about those words, what is the matter, is the writer of the words some Plato from Ancient Greece, or some modern philosopher? When we are thinking the modern philosophy, we can ask, how modern that thing could be Advocators of the modern philosophy shool is mentioned persons like John Locke, who lived in the last 17th century. That thing means that there are only a few changes in the way of thinking in the knowledge theory. Locke lived about 300 years ago, and that man is still very qualified philosopher.

Thoughts about the future and things, what are delicate for some people.

Thoughts about the future and things, what are delicate for some people. 

The thing about technical advancements of civilization is a very interesting object for thinking. When we are thinking about the technical solutions and biotechnology, we are facing one very interesting confrontation or paradox in those cases. The future of the human race would seem very nice, without our actions, what are risking the existence of the entire nature and our species.

Sometimes I have seen cases or arguments, where genetic and biological manipulation are prohibited because God has created us. Or that seems a very good argument for the new laws. This thing is interesting because some of those people are denying the existence of the god. There is some kind of contradiction, if the same person pleads for something, what does not exist.

Some people want to prohibit genetic engineering of human beings because that thing fights against the natural selection of some religious point of view. But there is one thing, what we must realize, and that is those people would probably not have things like cancer or AIDS, and that would make them real militant in the cases, where scientists are creating changes in our genomes.

When we are thinking about natural objects like small asteroids, which can cause very big destructions on the Earth, if they hit to the ground, there are people, who are denying the use of rockets or missiles against those targets. Those people have very good arguments for that solution, where the people just sit on the chair and let things happen because the asteroid is naturally created threat. That means  10 to 40 meters size stone can cause very big destruction if it hits on Earth.

That kind of stones can easily be destroyed or cut in smaller bites by using missiles. The thing is that those asteroids are one of the biggest threat for the human being and the possibility that those bites attack to Edinburgh is same class, what the hit to the same size area everywhere on the Earth is. The thing is that asteroids are natural objects, which are dead. 

This kind of things interesting, because at the same time people are risking their entire living environment. When we are thinking about the growing city-areas, we must face one very interesting thing, and that is that fast-growing cities are bringing natural animals near the human the way, what we have not seen ever before. This kind of things is called environmental angst.

But if we are thinking about the environment, we must realize, that we must not protect every stone, which can be found in the Universe.  When we are talking about the survivability of the human race, we should not set some bacteria ahead us, this is the thing, what we must realize.

Someday in the future, we would face the thing, that the genetic alteration of DNA is used, and that would cause very interesting visions of the humanity of tomorrow. The thing is that evolution is continuing in the human race as it has been happening before, and at last, a human would turn to another species if some kind of nuclear warfare or meteorite would destroy our entire planet.

A new planet has been found 31 light-years away

 

Image: David A. Hardy

A new planet has been found 31 light-years away

NASA informs that it has found planet from 30 light-years away, what is in the right distance from the star. And that kind of exoplanets is fascinating in many ways. In the next writing, I will think, what would we do, if we will someday colonize that kind of planet.

If we would want someday colonize that kind of planets we might have a vision in our eyes, that we would land on that planet and walk around it by arming some kind of rifles. But if we would land on that planet or fly to that solar system, there are two versions of the possibility, what we might find in that strange world.

1. If the planet is similar to Eart

This case is given visions to many romantic space movies, but in real life, if we would land to that planet, we might face many dangers, what we ever expected. The surface of the planet could be full of life forms like bacteria, which might use our tissues as the nutrient. And this thing makes the planets, what has similar conditions more dangerous to us than the planet, which has only the hostile atmosphere or some kind of radiation.

Chemical dangers like chlorine are easier to control than some organism, what might be different, what we see on the Earth. And if we would think cases, that we would travel on the surface of this habitable planet, we cannot step even on the grass, because it might be the tentacle for hunting prey, because that thing might not be the grass. In that strange world would live life forms, like medusas, what can live on dry land, and that makes this planet very dangerous.

There have been plans, that the planet, what is full of dangerous species, what are the level of bacteria would transform similar to Earth by melting its entire lithosphere. That would happen by using kinetic energy rocket.

Or sometimes the planet would be targeted to an asteroid, where is connected the ion motors, which will impact the lithosphere with very high speed, and it would melt it immediately. That thing would sterilize the planet very effectively, and then the bacteria and other things would deliver on that planet, but there are many moral and ethic questions about that thing.

2. Planet what has no life forms

In this case, the planet would be safer than the planet, what has life forms. The gas can keep out the spacecraft, and the thing is that this kind of worlds can make similar to Earth by using bacteria and cells to transform the atmosphere. And if there would be no water, it can be brought from the space, or sharper to say the stars own Oort cloud, where could be found many icy asteroids.

But if there is another possibility to make water, and that can be done by simply burning the hydrogen, where the exhaust would be water. And the hydrogen is the most common particle in the universe. Oxygen can isolate from the chemical combinations like carbon dioxide. And sometimes has been introduced that planet Venus can transform like Earth by simply filtering the atmosphere by using active carbon filters, and the gas would be pulled through the filters, what are used in the submarines.

But that equipment, what is used in this plan would be bigger. The system would be the tube or smoke pipe, which will suck the gas through the carbon filter, which is similar, which is used in the gas masks. This can separate the carbon from oxygen, and it would transform the atmosphere of Venus, and what works in Venus would work also on another planet. But it takes a long time.

https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-tess-telescope-habitable-world-31-light-years-away-2019-7?fbclid=IwAR0ZTZzDmLzo98XpgBlr5mWfgwhKcUYd6WUN5-3wgWklcPPsc-YSxJtIl0E&r=US&IR=T