We all have our own circles, and finding out those things is an effective way to create methods for targeting marketing

We all have our own circles, and finding out those things is an effective way to create methods for targeting marketing

Algorithms are collecting and compiling information from the web, and they are trying to connect people to separated groups. The way they are speaking is telling about their attitudes, but also there is a possibility to compile the words, what those people are using. And the words and other kind of things like what kind of things people are using on the Internet are uncovering the social and political environment, where those people are spending their time.

The algorithms are also comparing the data, what they are collecting from the different parts of homepages, and then they are making a profile of the user. They use texts, films and other kind of things for making profiles, and then those algorithms are comparing the profiles together. They are making groups of the users, and in that thing, they are using also the images or recognition photos for making profiles.

Those profiles are used for creating the targeting marketing, what those people would like. And then those algorithms suggest the music and another kind of things, that people would follow and what makes them the interest of products, what those commercials offer to them.

When computers are making profiles, they can use multilevel tasking, and the same person can be a member of different groups of people in the network of social media. The thing is that people can be chosen in the groups of the long-hair men, men with leather west or group of men, who hate women, apples or people who hate Japanese motorbikes".

The idea is to find a common divisor, what connects people together. And that information is vital in the targeted marketing

Those people would like to buy the inch designed tools for the American motorbikes if they own that, and then they would get the targeted commercial. For finding that thing the algorithm would search the images and find things like Harley-Davidson logos. And if they are finding the motorbikes, they can target the marketing of the inch-dimension tools and another kind of things like pistons to those people.

The system would follow, the things how long that person would look at the films, and that would tell what kind of music those persons like, and what kind of videos they are looking at. And then the system would put the person in the group, "person who owns American motorbike and like death metal music".

Those groups can be billions, and when the computer makes the selection, it doesn't care about the groups, where we have joined by our own will. Algorithms would use many things to make that kind of separation. And they will notice if some member of some groups of Social media tells things, what was told in some group to another group.

This kind of people can put in the group "people who share information, which is not meant to share outside the group".  The algorithms are noticing, if the group is closed, and if somebody shares things about that group to some other group, would that thing be noticed by algorithms.

Why we should talk more about the European parliament?

Why we should talk more about the European parliament?

Nationalism is a big threat for the European Union, and what we must realize when we are talking about European parliament? That parliament has only an advisory role in the European Union, and that's why this thing is sometimes left out from the public media. But when we are thinking about the advisory role in the European Union, the salary of that job is really big, the 9000 euros per month is very big money to almost every person in the world, and there would be some other benefits about this job.

This is the thing, what people normally forget when we are talking about the European Union and the role of the parliament in this system. Sometimes political leaders are hiding back of that kind of organizations, and they just accept things, what are made in the European Parliament, appealing that the parliament or European Union has been forcing them to do those decisions, and then they hadn't got any change to say a thing against those persons, who are sitting in European Parliament.

European parliament would get a very high salary

9000 euros per month is big money. That means that there is "lots of people" who want to go to that place. This is the thing, what makes so difficult to make decisions what is concerning this thing because if the MEP (Member of the European Parliament) wants to divorce, that means that this person would lose the 9000 euros salary. This kind of things is really interesting things to think when we are thinking about personal relationships with the European Parliament.

When we are facing populism and so-called easy solutions, we must realize that the relationship with the EU is Complicated than we ever can imagine. When people would get a place in the European Parliament, they forget the thing, what they said during the campaign. And in the modern time, we have new threats, what we must face.

One of them is international global warming, where we must find solutions at the International level. For handling that kind of things, we must have an international forum, where we can discuss that kind of things. Could that forum be the European Parliament or some other actor is the thing?  That we or political decision makers must think.

We would need concrete decisions in many things at international level

When we are thinking about the green energy and military systems that hydrogen very suitable fuel for military jets and high power turbines, and that material can produce by using electrolysis in the aircraft carriers. If the hydrogen-powered aircraft would have also oxygen tanks, it can fly higher than any other aircraft in the world.

And what kind of thing that forum could be? Could it some kind of building, or the virtual workspace, what is like some kind of Second Life, where the members of this panel would meet together in the virtual world, where they can share thought together. Or could it be some Facebook group, where those people can write and talk about things?

And in those places, we must make real decisions for handling that kind of things. Maybe we can order things like pollution taxes. In this model, we could determine the pollution frames for each nation, and that means that we can determine the level of pollution for each citizen. That level could be shown as points, and things like owning a car could bring more points to that thing, and if somebody would not own a car, that means that somebody else could buy those free points. But this is the steel wire model about those things.

The train could travel faster than aircraft in Hyperloop

The train could travel faster than aircraft in Hyperloop 

Trains can travel faster than aircraft in hyperloop if the gas in the tube is removed. In the vacuum is not friction, what will cause the body of the vehicle would not heat. The Hyperloop itself is an impressive tool for mass transportation, but it has given an idea of even more impressive tool.

The tool is the "magnet loop", where the magnet track would act like a particle accelerator, which can make the cheap space travels true. Or in fact, this machine can make even time travel possible, because when the very heavy elements were driven in the cyclotron of CERN and those elements, what time of existing is normally a couple of microseconds were existed much longer time, when their speed was increased near the speed of light, that thing caused the effect where the time those particles were moving slower.

If we can stop the time

In theory, stopping the time is possible, by using the system what increases the mass of the object to the point, where the escaping velocity would be the same as the speed of light. Or actually, we can go in the small capsule, and put that capsule in the magnetic accelerator, what would increase the speed to the speed of light.

In both cases, the time would travel slower, and that thing would make possible to stop the time. But as I just said this kind of trip would be very risky for the entire planet, because if the magnet in the particle accelerator would break, that thing would cause that very big energy load would be released, if the capsule hits to the wall of particle accelerator.

But how we would travel in time?

Traveling in time is theoretically very easy. We must just cross the cosmic speed limit and there is no existing technology, what we can use in that thing. But in fact, there is a place in the Universe, where the particles travel faster than the light. The place is a black hole, where the escape velocity is higher than the speed of light.

And if we could someday make an artificial black hole, we can shoot the spacecraft through it. But this thing is extremely dangerous, because of the singularity can suck entire Earth to it, and that is very risky business. Creating the artificial black hole would happen by targeting the very high-level energy burst to some target. The energy what is needed is very high.

Even in this case, the speed of the craft must accelerate to near the speed of light, because the acceleration of the craft would otherwise be too high. That means that the crew of that hypothetical time machine would turn to pancake. This kind of things is extremely difficult to handle. So this kind of things would need extremely large systems, and maybe in some distant future this kind of system would be created to some other planet, or it will create behind the Oort cloud.

One very dangerous thing about transferring electricity without wires

One very dangerous thing about transferring electricity without wires


Plasma can replace the physical wires

The idea of transferring electricity was to create by Nikola Tesla. One thing what makes problems for transferring electricity through the air is that the electricity is transferring in the ionized gas and that kind of systems would cover entire Earth with ion-layer, what would act like giant EMP-system, what denies the communication, or actually the same system can be used in the communication.

So the use of the radio waves in high-voltage electric transfer, the system must be used the targeted transmitters. Plasma is ionized gas, which can conduct a certain point by using magnetic fields. It will react magnets like some iron or other magnetic material. And if the towers would be magnetized, the plasma can travel between them. If the system would use magnets, that plasma can travel between the towers very sharply, and replace the physical wires.

Wardenclyffe machine can weaponize very easily

But there is one very interesting thing, and that is similar to "Philadelphia Experiment", and that is that the electromagnetic field would cause the "artificial dreams" in the mind of humans. If we are thinking about "Wardenclyffe"-test, there could happen some strange things in the mind of the people, because the electric field was increased the electric voltage in the nervous system of the people, who were watching that thing.

The "Wardenclyffe machine" is actually a generator what rotates on the isolating tower. The system transforms gas to plasma, which can target to any target on Earth. The targeting of that plasma can be happened by using the radio signal, what have opposite polarity. That will suck to ionized gas to that point, and if the level of voltage is high enough, that thing can even melt the target.

The thing is that the electromagnetic fields would increase the power of the radio waves when they are coming through those fields, and that thing might cause a really interesting effect. That effect is that the power of the cosmic radio signals would also increase, what might cause interferences in wireless communication. But if the system would cover entire Earth by using plasma, that thing would act like some extreme EMP machine.

What might be the truth about the "Philadelphia Experiment"?

What might be the truth about the "Philadelphia Experiment"?


The "Philadelphia Experiment"

Were the strange tales about the vortexes around this test only the memories or extraordinary work of the nervous system, or was there something else is a mystery. We all know that the "Philadelphia Experiment" has caused many theories, and in the wildest theories in the atmosphere opened the black hole, what allowed those people to see to the future.

There is a possibility that the high power magnetic field would cause the so-called synthetic dreams in those persons nervous system. Sometimes there is claimed that USS Elridge was traveling in the time, or if the magnetic field would make radio signals too strong, people might read the thoughts of other people.  And in some explanations there were given, is that the US Navy teleport the ship. When we are thinking about the theoretical teleportation, there is a possibility, that by using radio waves the very large object can really be moved to another place.

Magnets can turn ammunition away from their trajectory. 

In this scenario, an object would be loaded with the electricity, which has the same polarity as the radio waves. And the radio waves would push the object like a billiard ball.  This effect would also be attempted to use for turning the ammunition away from the track. The idea would load the ammunition with the same polarity with the ship, and then the radar or magnet would target them, and then the trajectory of that ammunition would be changed.

And if the target would be loaded with opposite electric polarity, that would suck ammunition to it. The idea is simple, if in the middle of the target would put the high power magnet, it just pulls the ammunition in that point.  There have been theories about the tests where the drones or helicopters would equip with high power magnets, and those magnets would turn the ammunition to another course.

They saw something...

Many times there is explanations about the things, what was going on that ship on that day. The thing is that even if people see something, that thing might not be true, and sometimes there are things, what would happen in the high power electric field, what can change the power of the electric signals in human brains. Sometimes I have thought that could those things, what have reported actually the result of the flashbacks, what the magnetic field have caused.

There are many explanations about the thing, what happened in USS Elridge during the "Project Rainbow". The thing was that the ship was targeted with very high-power radio signals and the electric fields around it were very powerful, what might be meant the electric signals in the human nervous systems would turn somehow different. That could cause the dreams or hidden memories came in the mind of those sailors.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment

There have been given ideas that the EEG-waves could blow to other people brains or some receiver. by using radio waves. 

The high-power magnet field can cause the situation, that the weak radio signals what are causing because of the electricity of the nervous system, would strengthen, and maybe that radio signal would be visible by other people. This would make ESP or mind reading possible in a certain and controlled environment. But this might mean the very powerful magnetic field, and this can make this kind of test dangerous.

The thing is very well-known, that magnetic fields are making electric signals more powerful than they usually are, and that thing might be brought memories or dreams to the knowledge of the persons who were in that experiment. But this is only one explanation for the strange things, what has been happened. If we are thinking about the "green fog" the thing can cause because of the electric vortex in the ship or area would cause that the electricity in the nervous system is blocked, and that causes the hallucinations.

People are looking at the company, which is similar to them.

People are looking at the company, which is similar to them.


When we are looking at social relationships with people and social media, what connects many people around the world, we are facing the thing, that our social networks are constructed by people, who are similar what we are. If we are living in our own house, most of our social connections are living in their own houses, because we are meeting and familiarize with other people in the meetings, what is touching something that we have, and if we own house, we might meet people is the garden masses. And there we are meeting other house owners.

One side information in this example is the thing might make us believe that most of the people are living in their own houses, and this thing is feed by Hollywood, where every so-called normal person is living in their own house. And when we are meeting other people, we are asking them to grill parties, where we are making things like skewers or sausages.

Those people are living also in their own houses, and we are talking about things like lawnmowers and another kind of common things. This is a very good example of the homogeneous social relationships in the persons own network. If we think more carefully, we must think, that people would not live in the house, they are living in a flat, if we are living in a flat.

Lack of social diversity kills real discussions

Social diversity is the same thing as biodiversity. We don't have to call people, who have different opinions than we have to visit our home. That is sad because different opinions can enrich discussions. We have right to close every person, who have different opinions away from our social network because we have the right to hear only people, who have the same way to think and similar opinions what we have.

And why we would ask some person, who thinks a different way to our house or home? We have the right to filter those things away from our parties and private life, and then we can hear only things, what is pleasing us, and supports our point of view things.

I have the right to choose my company and news myself, and I can leave things, which are uncomfortable for us without notice

Social diversity guarantees that we would get information from multiple sources, and then we might see, that everything, what we are reading or what we are looking has many kinds of truths. Actually, there are many versions of the truth, and most of the people want to tell things, by using the way, what seems to show that person in the best point of view.

Let's take one example of that thing. When we are facing things that some policeman or reporter asks about guns from some street or MC-gang, whose headquarters is full of weapons, those people might say, that everybody carries guns. This might be true,  in their case, because every people, wh they know might carry guns. And of course, they are told stories, that somebody has shot them or their friends, but there is always forgotten the very interesting part of those cases. That is who began to shoot in that area? Who opened fire against other gangs?

Did people tell truth, the whole truth and nothing more than the truth?

And what happened before that? In those stories, they own part of those cases is always forgotten, and everything happens to some friends, and when the person sits in jail, they will tell, how some person, without reasons, just pull the pocket knife out the pocket, and then this person shot 15 round magazine to that inmate in panic of course. If somebody asks, why there was no knife, that person tells that somebody took it from the crime scene, and police hate that innocent person, who is, of course, faced racial prejudice from the policemen, who were white or black, depending on the color of the skin of the suspect, and policeman has always prejudice against normal people, who like s big cars and who are different than they are.

And of course that the reason for the meeting was the drug deals because the car is full of crack ampules, but those things are always someone else, who lend the car. And every time that kind things are always forgotten to tell in the court. How that man, who looks like some kind of rap-artist can even think violent things, and the sub-machine gun in the car is only for the self-defense, because people hate Cadillac Fleetwood Eldorado, what that kind of people are driving. And this 41 years old person lives with mother, so what happens if that inmate would go to jail? Who takes care of the old woman?

The lack of social diversity in the social relationship makes people happy, because everybody, who people know have similar backgrounds, but it kills the ability to hear things, what we don't want to hear. We always want to be right, and that's why we are surrounding us with people, who have similar opinions about the things, what we have. And then we will cheer together when we are getting, what we want.

Social media and the Internet gives billions of choices to share and get information, but we always choose the simplest. We are looking for homepages, which pleases us and talk with people, who have the same opinions as us. And the thing is that we are facing the situation, that we are reading and looking at information, which supports our own opinions.

Algorithms and fake news are a threat to democracy

Algorithms and fake news are a threat to democracy

As I have written before the same algorithms, what are used for marketing, can be used to target the propaganda on the Internet, and this makes them a very effective tool in the wrong hands. At the begin, we have faced cases, where politicians are suspected to send the trolls to their E-mails or social media accounts.

That would seem a very nice method to grow own popularity in the eyes of normal people. So politics is a dirty game, and that means that there are many people, who would use trolls to support their candidate. The messages that are full of hate and treats are a good way to bring publicity and also give a reason to be saying nothing. If that kind of candidate would not come to political discussions the reason could be afraid that something would happen.

When we are thinking about propagandists and their way to work, we are facing really uncertain methodology, where some Internet users are collecting a really big audience by sharing some kind of entertainment stuff on the net. And then they are turning their accounts to the tool of propaganda.

The big audience is a necessary thing for propagandists

The idea of this is that when the propagandist or PSY-OP-operator would start the mission, the information what is shared will get the largest audience, what those people can get. When we are thinking about psychological operations and fake news, there are many ways to accomplish the operation.

One of the things is to use manipulated images, where are connected details, like white powder on the table, by using photo manipulation programs, like Photoshop. Another way is to capture the accounts, which are used by respected journalists. In those cases, the propagandist would try to use the information is always very simple.

Propagandists believe in strong leadership

The data, what is shared is almost every time propped up by using the position as the manager. That means that the propagandists almost every time support the strong leadership, which would give them the chance to influence only one person, and strong leaders are good targets for flatterers. In those cases pleasing the leader is easier than please many people. The thing, what we ever thought or what we ever mentioned in the courses is that also journalists have political opinions. The world is full of people, who believe things like authoritarianism and totalitarianism. Some of those people are journalists. Have you ever visited in the non-democratic country?

There is a so-called official press, and there are people, who are writing stories in those official newspapers. Those people are really problematic because they are writing a very good language, and nobody actually realizes that the information, what those people share is shared without criticism and using one-side sources. The best weapon in the hands of propagandists is the subjective truth. Also in the propaganda weapons and violence are in the big role.

Those people are using many times the images, where the people, who they support are posing with guns, and they would many times tell people that if the comments are involving too much criticism those guns would be used against people, who are criticizing the data.  Violence is a very good way to order other people to keep their mouth shut, and one of the best argument is the neighbor what has 20 million nuclear weapons, and brainwashed military force. If you will irritate the leaders of that country they will attack immediately.

When they are telling about the rapes, they are telling only rapes, what are made by foreigners. And those people are really good to use pity as the weapon. If we would go to some dictatorial country, what goes on war, we would see the bodies of children. And of course, the government tells us that they would be killed by the enemy, but what is the truth? When people are telling something, or they are ordered to do something, we must ask one question, and that is "who is given orders to that thing, and what that person has actually ordered"?

Truth is a complicated thing

The truth is a very complicated thing, and maybe some airstrikes to villages have killed civilians but were there the radio-transmitter in that village. Or was the bombed shelter used the command center? This is a very good point to think about what we see, might be different, what we want to believe. And we always want to believe, that journalists are good people. Sometimes journalists have connections even to organized crime, and that kind of things are really embarrassing.

In the world is many dictators, whose secret police controls the press, and those people are playing reporters. They always have the explanations for everything and in that kind of cases, where the journalists are working as propagandists or troll-makers, they have always a very good way to keep people silent. The thing is that they have their own personal experience with that kind of crimes, and that would be a good way to make people silent.