The form of the network is the chaos and order at the same time.

.

The form of the network is the chaos and order at the same time.

Frankenstein of order can transform the model of sociology. 

Frankenstein of order means the system, what is in order and disorder at the same time. When we are thinking about the network structures one of the most interesting things is that they can be chaotic and order at the same time. The quantum structures can be chaotic and order at the same time because the atoms in one dimension layer are seeming to be in line if we are seeing that structure at the side of that structure. When we are looking at that structure from above. The particles are seeming to be in a random position on the layer. 

So the particles can be in order but also in the turbulent or random positions when they are on the layer. The thing that makes that quantum phenomenon interesting is that we can transform it straight into sociology. When we are looking at things like groups of people from the same layer, we can think that people are nice in the line or row. But when we are going farther and above that layer. We are seeing the disorder of the same structure. The position of regular people is random, and everywhere seems to be chaos. So one dimension network is always chaos and order at the same time. 

Social media is one example of a social "Frankenstein of the order" or the system which is same time chaotic and order. Lack of leaders is the thing, that makes that kind of system hard to control by authorities.

If people seem to be in order, the image that comes from above might show the one-dimensional disorder. And that is the common thing in social networks. Those networks might look like led by leaders but the reality is that they are chaotic and independently-drifting systems without straight leaders. 

People make one mistake with social media. When they are trying to affect social media is that they are trying to effect chaos. They are looking for leaders and people who have leadership, and then try to make the leaders pull the people away from that world. The idea of social media is simple. Normal people can publish things, what they are writing. 

The network of people is always a hybrid system with the system that has leaders. And the same time the network-based system is a system that is drifting without leaders. So there are rings, which are controlled by leaders but also independent operators.

Because there are always many actors with different bases and backgrounds. That makes this type of system hard to manipulate because the manipulation is not coming from inside.  So if somebody pushes the chaotic network moving that system is hard to stop. Every actor in that group must make their own decisions and that makes it hard to control. 

And the thing is that the hobby of those people is publishing. This is the thing, that makes social media unstable and also a very complicated tool is that the people who are hanging or working there have many different motivations for making their publishings. Those people might be unsocial, but who determines the word "unsocial". Maybe they have problems communicating with other people. 

Or maybe they are like air to their group. But the problem with social media is that there are no leaders that are controlling other people. Normally the authority will take the contact to the group's simple way. That happens by calling its leader to discuss the things. The problem is that nobody controls social media, and even if something has been made up there are always people who are not accepting or know about that settle. And that means nobody controls things that are written or otherways published in the social network. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-frankenstein-of-order-and-chaos-researchers-discover-a-hybrid-quantum-system/

Image I: https://threatpost.com/defending-intelligent-edge-evolving-attacks/162172/