The "intelligent universe" theory again.

In the beginning: Spinoza.

Dutch Philosopher Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677) explained the god as nature's and universe's mechanism with no personality. So we can say that Spinoza is the creator or father of the so-called intelligent universe and simulated reality theories. The idea of the intelligent universe theory is that universe itself is intelligent. That is one of the biggest philosophical thoughts in history. 

Can plasma balls form qubits spontaneously? That thing is one of the biggest things in philosophy. Spinoza's idea about the god is that god is dominating structure because that structure is intelligent. And because there is no other so large and powerful structure. This structure makes what it wants. Without intelligence, other structures cannot resist that intelligent structure. 

That structure has intelligence and will. And that makes it dominating. The thing that makes this thing dominating is that can affect some big things. But small things like individual people are a little bit too small for that creature. Or that creature has no time to help all people in the same way. This is the way how Newton saw God. 

We can continue Spinoza's idea of god as the universe and natural mechanism with no personality by claiming that the dominating mechanism in the universe is the quantum computer that is spontaneously born. If Spinoza would live today. He might write that god is the network of the qubits around stars. 

Do you ever hear theories about the intelligent universe and simulated reality? Well maybe you are or you might hear about the "cosmic web" or "cosmic neural structure" that looks like human neurons. But that structure is the largest known structure in the known universe. 

Image 2) Cosmic neural structure. 

The idea of an intelligent universe is coming from the model where the star and plasma bubble around it can form the qubit. So when we are thinking more carefully, the term intelligent universe means spontaneously forming quantum computers. In that hypothetical system, the star in the middle of the plasma field gives energy to that plasma-based qubit. 

Can plasma-based extremely large qubits emulate human brains? That thing requires the situation where the qubit has three layers of ionized gas. The star acts as a pineal gland. And then the three layers of the plasma act as the three layers of the human brain. Superconducting asteroids could act as a memory of that hypothetical super brain. The center structure of the plasma ball can act as the diencephalon that decides what things that three-layer plasma brain should store in memory. 

Could a single human communicate with that kind of structure? If we are trying to think about this very strange intelligent structure we might think that this kind of hypothetical creature is a combination of intelligent creatures that are nested. The planet living organisms can give information for the larger parts of these superorganisms that must react. 

The fact is that the size of this kind of hypothetical plasma creature has no limit. Theoretically, the plasma channels can connect even galaxies as the most powerful quantum computer that we can even imagine. 

So smaller organisms are making simulations for the larger entireties that cannot react so fast how they must handle things. Things like plasma channels or wormholes could connect those qubits to one large entirety. The intelligent universe is a theory or model of the organism that is completely different from anything that we know. 

This type of theoretical or philosophical thought is interesting. If we think of the three-layer multi-state qubit as the computing system. That thing could emulate the human brain. But even if that kind of organism is possible we might still ask if can it feel anything. Or is that kind of thing only thinking machines? Could that hypothetical super creature feel or know even the existence of the single stars? Or could single galaxies be a little bit small thing for that kind of creature? 

https://www.livescience.com/strange-theories-about-the-universe.html

https://www.edge.org/conversation/ray_kurzweil-the-intelligent-universe

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/29/8847863/holographic-principle-universe-theory-physics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Spinoza

https://www.zmescience.com/science/human-brain-cosmos-05832/amp/?goal=0_3b5aad2288-683ab52bae-242764573&__twitter_impression=true

Image2) https://www.zmescience.com/science/human-brain-cosmos-05832/amp/?goal=0_3b5aad2288-683ab52bae-242764573&__twitter_impression=true

https://fromplatoscavetoreality.blogspot.com/

What is typical?

Is the Shelby cobra GT.350 the most typical car in the world? Or was that car the most common car in the world or even in the USA when it first time rolled out from the factory in 1965? That legendary car is back in production again. But the image portrays the 1965 model. The car is classic, but are those classics very often today?

Media is the place where the extraordinary is turning regular things. Typical news and articles are handling superlatives or something very extraordinary things. Things like the fastest aircraft, tallest buildings, and tallest trees fill all articles. When we are looking at media, we might think that regular people are misters or they are some kind of president. We might think that a regular Russian is Vladimir Putin. When we look at war movies we might think, that all U.S. soldiers are fighter pilots or some SEAL team members. 

We might think that a regular person in the western world is some kind of millionaire. If we look at car magazines we might think that all people are driving muscle cars. We might think that Shelby GT.350 is the most common car in the world. That car is over 50 years old. And maybe somebody put there the electric engine series. But otherwise, those cars are mainly in a museum or some movies. 

Is SR-71 a typical aircraft? That aircraft is well-known. But is it a typical U.S. aircraft, even in the military sector? 

So what is typical?

How good a question. The universe where we live is the only known universe in the third dimension. Because we don't know other universes, the universe where we are living is typical for us. Same way if we only see skyscrapers and we ever go out from an area where are skyscrapers we might think that skyscraper is the typical house where people are living. 

If we see only people who are similar to us, we might think that we are typical people. The thing is that we might think very extraordinary things very ordinary. When we are reading about things like scientific writing we might think that typical researchers are working with a Large Hadron accelerator in CERN. And typical physicists are working with some kind of Higgs boson research. 

Almost all published scientific stories about particles are connected with the Large Hadron collider and Higgs boson. But we can say that those things are not typical. They are the most high-energy particle and the most high-energy tools in physics. But the fact is that those superlatives are far away from the typical scientific tools. 

Same way if we think about the SR-71 "Blackbird" and the stories that are published about the fastest aircraft in the world we might think that the typical recon plane is some kind of SR-71. The fact is that the most unusual airplane in the world is not the SR-71 that is retired. 

Superlatives are fascinating things. They are always interesting. We might find the tallest tree in the world from the Guinness book of records or Wikipedia. 

That tree is Coastal redwood in California. But regular trees are a little bit shorter. But what if we spend our entire life in the forest where are only coastal redwoods? We might think that coastal redwoods are typical trees on our planet. 

So extraordinary fills most of the articles in the world. And that means we are facing one thing. Most of the articles and facts that are searched and written handle very extraordinary things. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_trees

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoia_sempervirens

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_Mustang

https://fromplatoscavetoreality.blogspot.com/

Quantum computers can find dark matter.

"In a new breakthrough, scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Fermilab have found a way to detect dark matter using quantum computers." (ScitechDaily.com/U.S. Dept of Energy Breakthrough: Detecting Dark Matter With Quantum Computers)

1) How do quantum computers detect dark matter?

The idea of quantum computers is that they use very highly controlled superpositioned and entangled photonic qubits. The idea is that the system pack information photons. And then that photon will be superpositioned and entangled. If that superpositioned and entangled photon touches something. 

That "something" causes a disturbance in the energy level of that superpositioned and entangled particle pair. So if the superpositioned and entangled qubit touches the dark matter. That thing causes disturbance of the energy levels. 

2) What the dark matter could be? 

Dark matter is interesting. 85% of the material in the universe is formed of dark matter. That is the gravitational effect whose source is unknown. The thing that makes the dark matter interesting. Is that it can interact with visible material only by gravitation. There are galaxies there is no dark matter. And that tells that it can form similar clouds as visible material. But what is dark matter? 

There are a couple of theories about that thing. 

*Is dark matter a so-called black photon?

The idea of black photons comes from the idea that the Schwinger effect that formed all matter during the Big Bang forms two particles. Schwinger effect forms particle-antiparticle pair. So the photon should also have anti-particle pair. That "anti-photon" should be a so-called "black photon". 

*Dark matter is virtual material. 

The term "virtual material" means that dark matter could be some hollow quantum field. That quantum field can be a 2-dimensional energy ring that causes forming of a virtual black hole in that ring-shaped structure. That thing explains why it's so hard to detect. 

There is a possibility that also hyper energy photons or some unknown very heavy but small particles are forming that mysterious dark matter. That particle could be like Higgs Boson. But it could exist only small moment. And when that particle vaporizes, it forms the thing called dark energy. 

So in this model dark energy and dark matter have the same source. But where that hypothetical vaporization happens? Does it happen in the plasma of the universe or outside the plasma bubble that is called the universe? 

*Dark matter is extremely high and low energy particles. 

The idea is that dark matter can be so high-energy level particles that they are pushing all radiation away from them. That makes those particles act like stealth aircraft. When wave motion travels or flows over them that causes the situation that there is no reflection from that matter. 

In the low energy model, the dark matter is simple flat material. The energy level of that material is so low that it cannot react.

*Dark matter is quantum-size black holes. 

There is the possibility that dark matter is quantum-size black holes or mysterious graviton particles. If that model is true that explains why we cannot see that particle. In that model, the whisk-looking structure of elementary particles would form at the surface of the magnetic field of that extremely small particle. So the quantum-size black hole hovers in the middle of the quark. 

https://scitechdaily.com/u-s-dept-of-energy-breakthrough-detecting-dark-matter-with-quantum-computers/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

James Webb and Keck-telescopes cooperation uncovered the clouds in Titan's atmosphere.

"Images of Saturn’s moon Titan, captured by the James Webb Space Telescope’s NIRCam instrument November 4, 2022. Left: Image using F212N, a 2.12-micron filter sensitive to Titan’s lower atmosphere. The bright spots are prominent clouds in the northern hemisphere. Right: Color composite image using a combination of NIRCam filters: Blue=F140M (1.40 microns), Green=F150W (1.50 microns), Red=F200W (1.99 microns), Brightness=F210M (2.09 microns). "

(ScitechDaily.com/Webb and Keck Telescopes Team for Unprecedented Look at Saturn’s Moon Titan – “Simply Extraordinary!”)

"Several prominent surface features are labeled: Kraken Mare is thought to be a methane sea; Belet is composed of dark-colored dunes; Adiri is a bright albedo feature. Download the Titan NIRCam image from the Resource Gallery. Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, A. Pagan (STScI). Science: JWST Titan GTO Team" (ScitechDaily.com/Webb and Keck Telescopes Team for Unprecedented Look at Saturn’s Moon Titan – “Simply Extraordinary!”)

Titan-moon is quite similar to Ganymede. The largest moon of Jupiter. The question is why does Ganymede not have a dense atmosphere? 

Titan is the biggest moon of Saturn. It's the only moon in our solar system that has a dense atmosphere. And that thing makes this moon remarkable. There are clouds in the Titan atmosphere. And that thing means there is also some kind of particles. They are forming clouds in the atmosphere of that very cold. The average temperature on Titan is 93,7K  (−179.5 °C). So those clouds can form around the small ice bites. 

There is 2.7±0.1% of methane (CH4) in the Titan atmosphere. And that thing can form methane ice in that atmosphere. 

There is no oxygen on Titan. And that denies the oxygenizing reactions. So that thing can make Titan a very interesting place. In that chemical environment, things like carbon-based molecules can stay almost forever. 

James Webb and other telescopes can uncover new details from that very extraordinary world with hydrocarbon oceans. Titan is a very dry moon, and there is no known water. But the dense atmosphere that is mainly nitrogen makes that moon very interesting. 

Because it should be like a freezer where is lots of material from the young solar system. The atmosphere protects those organic compounds from the UV radiation that comes from the Sun. So maybe the origin of life is stored in that icy moon. The nitrogen atmosphere of Titan is unique. The pressure of the atmosphere is 1,42 atm atmosphere. 

But the mass of that moon is lower than Ganymede, the largest satellite in the solar system. The surface gravity of Titan is 1.352 m/s2 (0.138 g) (0.835 Moon's) and the surface gravity of Ganymede is 1.428 m/s2 (0.146 g). The question is why Ganymede has no dense atmosphere. Maybe the distance from the Sun explains why Titan has its nitrogen atmosphere and Ganymede has not that thing. 

"Evolution of clouds on Titan over 30 hours between November 4 and November 6, 2022, as seen by Webb NIRCam (left) and Keck NIRC-2 (right). Titan’s trailing hemisphere seen here is rotating from left (dawn) to right (evening) as seen from Earth and the Sun. Cloud A appears to be rotating into view while Cloud B appears to be either dissipating or moving behind Titan’s limb (around toward the hemisphere facing away from us)." 

(ScitechDaily.com/Webb and Keck Telescopes Team for Unprecedented Look at Saturn’s Moon Titan – “Simply Extraordinary!”)

"Clouds are not long-lasting on Titan or Earth, so those seen on November 4 may not be the same as those seen on November 6. The NIRCam image used the following filters: Blue=F140M (1.40 microns), Green=F150W (1.50 microns), Red=F200W (1.99 microns), Brightness=F210M (2.09 microns). The Keck NIRC-2 image used: Red=He1b (2.06 microns), Green=Kp (2.12 microns), Blue=H2 1-0 (2.13 microns). Credit: NASA, ESA, CSA, W. M. Keck Observatory. A. Pagan (STScI). Science: Webb Titan GTO Team"

(ScitechDaily.com/Webb and Keck Telescopes Team for Unprecedented Look at Saturn’s Moon Titan – “Simply Extraordinary!”)

https://scitechdaily.com/webb-and-keck-telescopes-team-for-unprecedented-look-at-saturns-moon-titan-simply-extraordinary/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganymede_(moon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_(moon)

https://astronomyandtechnology.blogspot.com/

UFOs again misinformation, disinformation, and new evidence.

U.S. intelligence confirms the UFO research. They are saying that the origin of the UFOs:s is some governmental, non-governmental, or yet unknown actor. And that's it. Somewhere is claimed that China or Russia is behind those, sometimes very small and strangely behave aviation objects. The fact is that origin of the UFOs is unknown. 

Sometimes those objects fall into the sea. And then they vanish. Sometimes the UFO suddenly vanishes, when jet fighters follow it. And sometimes researchers think that those "Unidentified Flying Objects" are holograms. The purpose of those holograms could be to make people look away from something. That they should not see. 

China-hypothesis: are UFOs from China? 

When people are talking about the China hypothesis, where the origin of those objects is in China, some people are very skeptical. Is the Chinese aircraft industry capable to create that kind of thing? The fact is that those strange objects can behave in strange ways because they might be drones. But who operates them? 

The small size and long flight time make UFOs mysterious. By using radially installed rockets is possible to make saucer-shaped vehicles that can act very strangely. The maneuverability of those systems would be very impressive. But the problem is that those systems require fuel. 

The antimatter hypothesis: are those UFOs the famous "AREA-51 sports models"?

In some theories the UFO uses antimatter. There are two possibilities to use the antimatter engine. One is the rocket-looking system that was planned for interplanetary or interstellar rockets. The antimatter could explain the strange behavior of the UFO. In some theories, massive energy blast inside those vehicles causes time dilation. So time slows in those vehicles. And that makes them able to behave in a way that seems outstanding. 

Another way is to detonate the antimatter in a ball-shaped chamber inside the vehicle. That thing causes shockwaves that can make the craft hover. There is the possibility that there is a hood inside the saucer that can adjust the main direction of those oscillations. So are those UFOs:s the "sports models" that claimed to research by S-4 or AREA-51? 

Are UFOs some kind of stealth system? 

There is the possibility that the thing that makes those UFOs:s vanish is that they are ion structures. If the structure is an ion and anion combination. The neutralization of the anion or ions turns that thing into dust. So that thing explains why UFO suddenly vanishes. In some other theories, the UFO uses some nanotechnical stealth systems that make light act like radio waves over the stealth bomber. 

The thing that many people see when they see UFO is simply light. There is a mysterious light effect. And in some models, the purpose of the light is to cover the shape of the object that is hiding behind the light. So in some theories, some UFOs are made by the government for one purpose. Their purpose is to test how often people report strange phenomena. 

https://www.space.com/ufos-101-hype-uproar-disinformation-mystery

NASA: s new VASIMR engine takes spacecraft to Mars in 6 weeks.

A VASIMR (Variable Specific Impulse Magneto plasma Rocket) gives spacecraft travel ten times faster than a regular chemical rocket. That plasma-impulse engine is one of the most promising things for creating new and powerful rockets for interplanetary flight. The plasma ion engine can also give new kinds of abilities for the new type of spacecraft that are operating in the asteroid belt. 

There is the possibility that air-breathing ion engines are the future of aviation. The problem is that there is needed a system. That puts the ion engine push against the front wall of the engine. One of the solutions is to shoot laser rays in the middle of the ion track. That causes that part of the ions are jumping to the front of the engine. 

Another vision is that the ionized gas will put to travel in a screw-looking structure. That kind of ion system can use with regular jet engines as the electromagnetic afterburner. Or it can use things like electric cells or nuclear reactors as power sources. In some visions, the power satellites can pump energy to those air-breathing ion engines in the form of maser rays. That allows researchers to create the ion scramjets that are the most capable systems in the world. 

The same ion thruster that is making aircraft or space shuttle fly can use to protect that thing against missiles. The ion system can turn against incoming missiles, and then the radar system can load opposite polar electric power to incoming missiles. That makes those ions will impact the missile and damage its microchips. Another thing is that ions are forming a layer that the radio waves cannot pierce. 

The "VASIMR" system can also use in Earth-orbiting satellites. That must change their trajectories all the time. The thing is that the plasma-ion engine can also be used as an ion cannon. The plasma beam can target hostile satellites or incoming ASAT missiles. The plasma system can also use to deny communication between satellites and ground stations. And the ion satellite can poison the orbiter by using high-energy ions. 

If those ions (or anions) have the same polarity the magnetic field with the same electric polarity can push those ions or anions away from the satellite. But if that thing is not in use that ion cloud can damage the satellite. And the ion field denies the use of radio waves as the communication tool between satellites and ground stations. In that case, the satellite must use laser communication systems. Radio waves cannot travel through the plasma or ion cloud. 

https://www.eoportal.org/other-space-activities/vasimr

https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Space_Engineering_Technology/World-first_firing_of_air-breathing_electric_thruster

https://phys.org/news/2022-11-air-breathing-ion-boost-spacecraft-atmosphere.html

https://www.tekniikkatalous.fi/uutiset/kuudessa-viikossa-marsiin-tallainen-on-nasan-kehittama-plasmamoottori/e2a291d1-f189-4f2e-90cf-c061ccbc93a3

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

Biomechanic prostheses and brain control microchips are the new combination.

When we think about biomechanic prostheses there are two ways to control them. The easier way is to make a system that uses BlueTooth as the communication tool. In that case, the signals that are coming from brain-controlled BlueTooth devices normally remote control the prosthesis. And then another way to make the prosthesis is that the biomechanic system uses the impulses that come from the nerves of that wounded hand or leg. 

There are two main types of biomechanic or bionic prostheses. 

*The prosthesis is the external machine that connects to the user's body. The system can be a little bit like the HULC (The Human Universal Load Carrier) exoskeleton. And the Neuralink-type microchips can also control that kind of system. 

*Another version of that kind of system is the system that gives simulated neural impulses to the muscles. These systems are BCI-controlled electrodes that can give muscular stimulation from the outside. Those electrodes can be used by BlueTooth connection. 

The BlueTooth-based microelectronic systems can control things like mobile telephones or computers. And only the imagination is limited in those systems. The Bluetooth-based microchips can use to control jet fighters or computers that allow them to control things like drone swarms, and robots. Or any other devices through the internet. That kind of system can control things like robot assistants that are acting as external bodies for those operators. 

The communication between the device and the user can make by using external or synthetic reality. Or the system can use cortex stimulation that turns the external body into part of the nervous system. 

The "Neuralink" will revolutionize biomechanical prostheses. But it can also make many other things that have been impossible before into reality. The "Neuralink" is a surgically implanted microchip. That is Elon Musk-owned company. This kind of microchip can make it possible to control the biomechanic prosthesis. But the user of that kind of system can use things like mobile telephones by using this kind of microchip. The brain-implanted microchip can communicate with other devices by using BlueTooth communication. 

So "Neuralink" is one version of the BCI (BRain-Computer Interfaces). There is no limit to using that kind of microchip. The ability to connect things like computers and mobile telephones makes it possible. The Neuralink-system's users can connect their brains to the Internet whenever they want. 

https://bleex.me.berkeley.edu/project/hulc/

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/inventions/elon-musk-says-neuralink-is-ready-for-use-in-humans/news-story/27846d5228410829acc356f66dbda3a7

https://scitechdaily.com/a-new-dawn-for-prosthetics-engineers-light-the-way-to-nerve-operated-prosthetics-of-the-future/

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/