Tuesday, April 2, 2019
Killing political resistance is often the choice of non-democratic states
Killing political resistance is often the choice of non-democratic states
During the history, the leaders of non-democratic states have used assassinations to make their power more frightening. The thing, what those persons have chosen is very often the poison, and in the laboratories of intelligence services have been created very many poisons, what are tasteless and what doesn't smell. Those chemicals are problematic because they can use against the dictator, who might be the male or female.
The thing is that very exotic poisons like VX are connecting the assassins to the states is very well known thing, and those nerve-agents have been visible in the detectors. But the nanotechnology has given the assassins the tool, what is the most frightening in the history. In the crystals like sugar can store the poisons like cyanide, what are normally easy to detect. But those crystals, what is closed airtight denies that the dogs and detectors cannot see that very usual but otherwise easily detectable chemical.
And the nanotechnology allows to create small bags, what would melt in the stomach, and then the cyanide would be released in the most dangerous place. The nano bag would deny that the smell would not be released and that thing can put in the drink or food, and the common poison would hide the connection to the governments. But in the field of poisons is another very frightening tool, and that is nanomachines. The nanorobot can slip in the body of the targeted person, and then it can just close the blood veins, what takes blood to the brains.
The thing is that this robot can make this thing mechanically. In that case, it would be the small submarine, what just goes in a certain point in brain blood vein system, and that thing would cause a terrible situation. In some scenarios that kind of nanotechnical submarines can also be equipped with explosives. Those small size submarines are invented to research the blood system, but if they are equipped with RDX explosives can destroy the blood veins.
The nano technical midget submarine can also deliver the blood jelly chemical in that point, what causes the brain infarct, or they can use the chemical, what would tie extremely large mass of the liquid, and when that chemical would be released in the blood veins, it starts to swell and then it would close the blood veins. That kind of weapons is more frightening than the killing chemicals because that kind of things can make possible to hide those strikes.
Why populistic movements are turning against their supporters?
Why populistic movements are turning against their supporters?
The headline what I wrote should go like this: Why politicians don't keep their permissions, what they have given to electors? Here I mean that every politician is some kind of populist. The thing is that politicians must give permissions for the supporters and if the politician would not promise a single thing, nobody would give the vote to that person.
In the complicated world of politics, the politician must sometimes make permissions, what that person would not even self think as realistic. And in those cases, they must just expect that somebody else would fall their suggestion. But in the field of politics, there are cases, where the own benefit of the politician would go across the benefit of the party.
In those cases, we must realize that the place in the parliament is personally given to a politician. And here it the thing, why politics is so difficult field of the act. There are many suggestions, which are against some parliament members own way of view, and in those cases, they must sometimes vote against their own opinion, or they might lose the membership of the political movement. The thing is that acceptance to some list gives the political groups, what is called as "parties". In the cases that the political party works against the personal will of the politician is two ways to act.
Another is to stand in line with other members of the political movement or the other one is to find the new electors, and change the party. The last one would cause the situation where the person turns to a political weather vane, where the person would change party all the time when the political wind turned direction, and those persons can select their parties by looking at the most popular party. And the thing is that if the political movement uses social media would somebody start to make dirty politic in that media.
The thing is that those cheaters can hunt for people, who are registered to some political movement home pages, and start to pressure the people, who are the supporters of that party to leave those homepages, or the cheating continues. This is one version of the treating and making troubles for people, who are supporters of some movement. And that is the most usual dirty trick at the field of politics. The idea of that action is to isolate the politician from the electors, by denying to tell about their ideology to the people.
The headline what I wrote should go like this: Why politicians don't keep their permissions, what they have given to electors? Here I mean that every politician is some kind of populist. The thing is that politicians must give permissions for the supporters and if the politician would not promise a single thing, nobody would give the vote to that person.
In the complicated world of politics, the politician must sometimes make permissions, what that person would not even self think as realistic. And in those cases, they must just expect that somebody else would fall their suggestion. But in the field of politics, there are cases, where the own benefit of the politician would go across the benefit of the party.
In those cases, we must realize that the place in the parliament is personally given to a politician. And here it the thing, why politics is so difficult field of the act. There are many suggestions, which are against some parliament members own way of view, and in those cases, they must sometimes vote against their own opinion, or they might lose the membership of the political movement. The thing is that acceptance to some list gives the political groups, what is called as "parties". In the cases that the political party works against the personal will of the politician is two ways to act.
Another is to stand in line with other members of the political movement or the other one is to find the new electors, and change the party. The last one would cause the situation where the person turns to a political weather vane, where the person would change party all the time when the political wind turned direction, and those persons can select their parties by looking at the most popular party. And the thing is that if the political movement uses social media would somebody start to make dirty politic in that media.
The thing is that those cheaters can hunt for people, who are registered to some political movement home pages, and start to pressure the people, who are the supporters of that party to leave those homepages, or the cheating continues. This is one version of the treating and making troubles for people, who are supporters of some movement. And that is the most usual dirty trick at the field of politics. The idea of that action is to isolate the politician from the electors, by denying to tell about their ideology to the people.
Monday, April 1, 2019
Couple of words about the Big Bang
Couple of words about the Big Bang
There are a couple of theories about the things, what are caused the begin of the Universe. Those theories consist of the space and form of the material before the Big Bang and the meaning of those theories is to explain, where the material would come from. The first one is that at the beginning of the time and material the black hole or singularity sucked every material particle in it, and then the black hole would be alone in the dark universe. And then the photons started to escape from the black hole, with accelerating speed. That caused the birth of the universe.
The second one is that the singularity was opened in our universe, and caused the big bang. That means that the situation before the universe in the form, how we know that was born when the matter contacts the antimatter, and there were a little bit more the form of the particles, what we know as that material.
The thing is that physics and cosmologists have explained that in the beginning was two types of material, what were touching together, and caused the annihilation. That reaction is actually the extreme version of electric arcs, because the mirror particles, what have opposite electric polarities would touch together. And the loss of the capacity causes that the particles would break to the sub-particles like quarks.
Maybe that thing would explain the Big Bang, but the origin of that material and antimatter would remain a mystery. The origin of that material or quark-antiquark pairs would be in the energy, but there is another choice for that problem and maybe the scientists have solved this problem, and maybe the thing is only the hypothetical thought. That may be the matter is forming in the cases that the Higgs boson is slowing as in the article below this text is mentioned.
https://scitechdaily.com/possible-solution-mystery-origin-matter-universe/
There are a couple of theories about the things, what are caused the begin of the Universe. Those theories consist of the space and form of the material before the Big Bang and the meaning of those theories is to explain, where the material would come from. The first one is that at the beginning of the time and material the black hole or singularity sucked every material particle in it, and then the black hole would be alone in the dark universe. And then the photons started to escape from the black hole, with accelerating speed. That caused the birth of the universe.
The second one is that the singularity was opened in our universe, and caused the big bang. That means that the situation before the universe in the form, how we know that was born when the matter contacts the antimatter, and there were a little bit more the form of the particles, what we know as that material.
The thing is that physics and cosmologists have explained that in the beginning was two types of material, what were touching together, and caused the annihilation. That reaction is actually the extreme version of electric arcs, because the mirror particles, what have opposite electric polarities would touch together. And the loss of the capacity causes that the particles would break to the sub-particles like quarks.
Maybe that thing would explain the Big Bang, but the origin of that material and antimatter would remain a mystery. The origin of that material or quark-antiquark pairs would be in the energy, but there is another choice for that problem and maybe the scientists have solved this problem, and maybe the thing is only the hypothetical thought. That may be the matter is forming in the cases that the Higgs boson is slowing as in the article below this text is mentioned.
https://scitechdaily.com/possible-solution-mystery-origin-matter-universe/
Could the soul of human hide in the digital mode?
Could the soul of human hide in the digital mode?
The idea was actually in the movie "Tron", where the man disappeared, but the electric vortex or the soul would suck in the computer. The thing was that the system would destroy the body of the human, but the person would continue the living in the digital form, which means that the brain waves of that person would be stored in the computer or Internet. Then the soul could jump between the different robots and hide on the Internet, and if we could do that, could we someday return the soul to some other or the cloned body. And would the experience of being in the digital form similar to the movie "Tron".
This might feel a wild idea, but things like witness protection and other kinds of things would need the case that the body would be cooled in the very low temperature, and then the person would "sleep" a couple of hundred of years. And then the "soul" would return to that body, when the people, who were treated that person have been dead, or the symptom, what caused the freezing would get treatment.
The thing in that kind of thing is that we cannot even know is that kind of thing possible, or would it cause the thing that this inmates personality would change? In the case that we could store our EEG or soul on the Internet, we must think, what it might feel to be in the electric memory of the computer.
Would it actually like in some "Tron" movie, or would it be something different, or would that brain signals have the awareness at all, and could that person remember things, about the time, when that hypothetical test, where the soul has been copied and transferred to the new body has been done. One of the most interesting questions about this kind of things is would that EEG has the own will, what would make it dangerous? And would it possible to create synthetic EEG or soul and transfer it to the brains by using electric shocks, what will stimulate the neurons?
And the second thing in the cases that we would store our memories to the Internet for reusing that thing, would the person what would be created by the cloning and memory transfer actually the thing or person, what that person was before that operation? The idea that the soul can be copied in the hard disk would seem very interesting, but there is one thing, and that is that we don't have a single official experience about this kind of things, but there is one very interesting problem, and that is the possibility of connection with the original and copied souls. This kind of things is really interesting to think about when we are thinking about computers and their connection to human brains.
The idea was actually in the movie "Tron", where the man disappeared, but the electric vortex or the soul would suck in the computer. The thing was that the system would destroy the body of the human, but the person would continue the living in the digital form, which means that the brain waves of that person would be stored in the computer or Internet. Then the soul could jump between the different robots and hide on the Internet, and if we could do that, could we someday return the soul to some other or the cloned body. And would the experience of being in the digital form similar to the movie "Tron".
This might feel a wild idea, but things like witness protection and other kinds of things would need the case that the body would be cooled in the very low temperature, and then the person would "sleep" a couple of hundred of years. And then the "soul" would return to that body, when the people, who were treated that person have been dead, or the symptom, what caused the freezing would get treatment.
The thing in that kind of thing is that we cannot even know is that kind of thing possible, or would it cause the thing that this inmates personality would change? In the case that we could store our EEG or soul on the Internet, we must think, what it might feel to be in the electric memory of the computer.
Would it actually like in some "Tron" movie, or would it be something different, or would that brain signals have the awareness at all, and could that person remember things, about the time, when that hypothetical test, where the soul has been copied and transferred to the new body has been done. One of the most interesting questions about this kind of things is would that EEG has the own will, what would make it dangerous? And would it possible to create synthetic EEG or soul and transfer it to the brains by using electric shocks, what will stimulate the neurons?
And the second thing in the cases that we would store our memories to the Internet for reusing that thing, would the person what would be created by the cloning and memory transfer actually the thing or person, what that person was before that operation? The idea that the soul can be copied in the hard disk would seem very interesting, but there is one thing, and that is that we don't have a single official experience about this kind of things, but there is one very interesting problem, and that is the possibility of connection with the original and copied souls. This kind of things is really interesting to think about when we are thinking about computers and their connection to human brains.
Gaia and the SETI-program.
Gaia and the SETI-program.
The term "Gaia" means that there would be organisms, what are represent the different species, but they would operate as the one organism. The intelligent "Gaia", one of the most intelligent life forms, what we can imagine. In some theories is introduced the cases where the entire planet would pluralize itself as the one super intelligent life form is introduced in some novels, and here I'm trying to write about this strange idea of the super ecosystem, where every species operates together.
One of the hypothetical forms of "Gaia" could be that the fauna would act with the vegetable layer as human brains would act, and the form of this kind of extreme ecosystem can be that the entire planet would be covered by the neuron-vegetable hybrids, and the clouds are another series of neurons. Those cloud neurons, what are hovering in the atmosphere, would be extremely small size and the size of them might be like pollen. The small size would be guaranteed that they could stay inside the cloud and they are operating as the brain core, and the surface neurons would be like some mirror neurons.
Many people wonder, what the thing what the term "Gaia" actually means is the multi-species co-operation, and those species, what would seem different can operate as they would be the single species. One of the most fascinating things about the "Gaia" is that this life form must not cover the entire planet, and it can be actually local. And that would give a very good topic for some horror or sci-fi movie.
In some theories, this strange life form can actually look like some kind of bryophyte and the other part of this brains would act like a swarm of insects. When we are thinking about things like this hypothetical intelligent life form, we can face one of the most fascinating models of intelligence, what any scientist or theorist have ever created is that the "Gaia" would not intelligent all the time.
This means that the swarm of insects can travel across the entire planet and come to meet another component of it, and then the intelligence can be connected between those neurons, and that would create the intelligent life form, what could give the missions to the bugs, where the brain core would be. And then those bugs would fly away, and they will return after the certain time have been gone. When we are thinking about this kind of intelligence, it would be totally different, what we are. And actually, this kind of intelligent life form would not able ever create the technology, which allows it to fly to space.
In the world are many tales about strange spirits and life forms, and maybe some of them are intelligent. But maybe their intelligence is so different than ours, that they do not even notice us. The thing is that the idea of this life form is actually taken from the novel, what name I don't remember. The fact is that before we would meet the alien or visit on the planet, where is the intelligent habitant, we cannot even imagine, what this life form can look like, and what kind of technology it might have.
And maybe this kind of "Gaia" would be dangerous, because it could transfer it neuron fibers in the fictional astronauts, and infect them. So every operation on the planet, what seems habitable should at the first make by using the remote-controlled robots, what would not infect the spacecraft with some bodysnatchers, what will transfer the entire crew to zombies.
Productizing the human is the trend of today
Productizing the human is the trend of today
When we are thinking the human as the product, we can say, that this thing is only the rumor or some other kind of sci-fi. We are thinking that the productizing the human is the cause of genetic engineering or something like that. The thing is not quite like that, even if we like that the productizing the human is some kind of story or fiction. The thing is that the human is the product of schools and universities. And in history, we can think that the mercenaries, what are trained to fight, and who were served in other nations armies are also the products.
But when we are talking about things like training, we can say that also architects and lawyers are products, what their academies use to market their training, and the best business card for the academy is the architect or some other highly trained specialist, who can do the job well. That would bring more students to that academy, which has one product, the professionals, what it trains. This is one way to think about the difficult question about the productizing the human, which is a really very sensitive thing in history.
Slaves were the product of the slave traders, and that thing is quite a common problem in the labor markets of modern society. There are millions of handicapped people, who are working in the same jobs with so-called "wealthy" people, but they would not get salaries about their job. But when we are thinking the slavery, we might ask could the intelligence be the thing, what is the slavery of the next generation. The movie "Matrix" is giving us the extreme example, what would the road to the all-time use of the Internet take us.
A road would take to that point, where the human race is locked in the tanks, and their brains are connected to the computer, what will use the brain capacity of the human race in the own purposes. The humans would be physically weak because they don't have to even move their hands, and the remote-controlled robots would do every job on the planet, but that situation causes that the man is lying helpless in those tanks, and the nutrient would be the thing, what makes the computer or the collective mind able to control each individual.
The weak bodies would not able to maintain the body functions and the lack of the bacteria causes that nobody can live outside the tanks, and if the system would notice abnormal functions in the brains, it would just remove that person. The thing what makes this thing form the collective mind is that the brains are connected straight together by using the implanted electrodes.
That thing would connect the entire human race to the one collective consciousness, and that would be the most advanced thing, what mankind ever creates, but the thing is that this would make the future the biggest nightmare, what the man has ever imagined. It would terminate the individualism and make everything the same mass, and that kind of situation will be terrifying.
And the thing is that only one bacteria would cause the destruction of that system. And this is one version of dystopia. So the Internet is the biggest change, what mankind can imagine, but it might be also our biggest nightmare. The way how we want to benefit that thing determines the way, where we will go when we are inventing new things and use the International network.
When we are thinking the human as the product, we can say, that this thing is only the rumor or some other kind of sci-fi. We are thinking that the productizing the human is the cause of genetic engineering or something like that. The thing is not quite like that, even if we like that the productizing the human is some kind of story or fiction. The thing is that the human is the product of schools and universities. And in history, we can think that the mercenaries, what are trained to fight, and who were served in other nations armies are also the products.
But when we are talking about things like training, we can say that also architects and lawyers are products, what their academies use to market their training, and the best business card for the academy is the architect or some other highly trained specialist, who can do the job well. That would bring more students to that academy, which has one product, the professionals, what it trains. This is one way to think about the difficult question about the productizing the human, which is a really very sensitive thing in history.
Slaves were the product of the slave traders, and that thing is quite a common problem in the labor markets of modern society. There are millions of handicapped people, who are working in the same jobs with so-called "wealthy" people, but they would not get salaries about their job. But when we are thinking the slavery, we might ask could the intelligence be the thing, what is the slavery of the next generation. The movie "Matrix" is giving us the extreme example, what would the road to the all-time use of the Internet take us.
A road would take to that point, where the human race is locked in the tanks, and their brains are connected to the computer, what will use the brain capacity of the human race in the own purposes. The humans would be physically weak because they don't have to even move their hands, and the remote-controlled robots would do every job on the planet, but that situation causes that the man is lying helpless in those tanks, and the nutrient would be the thing, what makes the computer or the collective mind able to control each individual.
The weak bodies would not able to maintain the body functions and the lack of the bacteria causes that nobody can live outside the tanks, and if the system would notice abnormal functions in the brains, it would just remove that person. The thing what makes this thing form the collective mind is that the brains are connected straight together by using the implanted electrodes.
That thing would connect the entire human race to the one collective consciousness, and that would be the most advanced thing, what mankind ever creates, but the thing is that this would make the future the biggest nightmare, what the man has ever imagined. It would terminate the individualism and make everything the same mass, and that kind of situation will be terrifying.
And the thing is that only one bacteria would cause the destruction of that system. And this is one version of dystopia. So the Internet is the biggest change, what mankind can imagine, but it might be also our biggest nightmare. The way how we want to benefit that thing determines the way, where we will go when we are inventing new things and use the International network.
The movies and their influence on society
The movies and their influence on society
Sometimes people have claimed, that movies would not have an influence on society, but in fact, there is one problem of those things. If somebody wants to make pure propaganda, would that person use the film as the document, and that makes the film a very dangerous tool. In this text, I will write about movies, where is not used the flash photographs or subliminal messages, what would make the propaganda more effective and influential than the normal movie, what can use as the tool of propaganda.
The thing is that this kind of propaganda is hard to resist if it would introduce as the documentary and authentic information. In history is a very good example, when the media or radio broadcast have almost caused the nuclear war. The radio drama "The war of the worlds" what was piloted by the Orson Welles caused almost the national emergency when people thought that the USA was under the attack, and called to the police and Pentagon because they were listening to that broadcast.
The influence of the movies, what is pure fiction to the collective societies has not actually any researches, but the thing is that if in the movies some part of people is always demonized, and they are introducing as the "bad people", will that cause hate. The movies have great influence on the way of think of individuals if the people are watching violent movies at a very young age and if the adults will say, that the violence, what those people see in movies is tolerated.
And as the Joseph Goebbels, the minister of propaganda of the Nazi-Germany said, when the lie is simultaneously repeating people are starting to believe it. This is the problem with the movies. Even if we know that they are pure fiction, they have an influence on the way of think of the people. If we think about the influence of the films to the individual people, we must realize that those things like violent movies teach the way of think to the people, who are watching those movies.
The problem with movies is that they can use to demonize the other people, and if the adults allow looking at the violence, and teach the children that the violence, what those youngsters see is right, would that cause very bad situations and in the worst case the result would be some kind of mass shooting. And if the movies are using in the wrong purpose, like teaching that violence is the solution for young people would the results be horrifying. So that's why the movie makers must feel their responsibility when they are making their product for entertainment purposes.
Sometimes people have claimed, that movies would not have an influence on society, but in fact, there is one problem of those things. If somebody wants to make pure propaganda, would that person use the film as the document, and that makes the film a very dangerous tool. In this text, I will write about movies, where is not used the flash photographs or subliminal messages, what would make the propaganda more effective and influential than the normal movie, what can use as the tool of propaganda.
The thing is that this kind of propaganda is hard to resist if it would introduce as the documentary and authentic information. In history is a very good example, when the media or radio broadcast have almost caused the nuclear war. The radio drama "The war of the worlds" what was piloted by the Orson Welles caused almost the national emergency when people thought that the USA was under the attack, and called to the police and Pentagon because they were listening to that broadcast.
The influence of the movies, what is pure fiction to the collective societies has not actually any researches, but the thing is that if in the movies some part of people is always demonized, and they are introducing as the "bad people", will that cause hate. The movies have great influence on the way of think of individuals if the people are watching violent movies at a very young age and if the adults will say, that the violence, what those people see in movies is tolerated.
And as the Joseph Goebbels, the minister of propaganda of the Nazi-Germany said, when the lie is simultaneously repeating people are starting to believe it. This is the problem with the movies. Even if we know that they are pure fiction, they have an influence on the way of think of the people. If we think about the influence of the films to the individual people, we must realize that those things like violent movies teach the way of think to the people, who are watching those movies.
The problem with movies is that they can use to demonize the other people, and if the adults allow looking at the violence, and teach the children that the violence, what those youngsters see is right, would that cause very bad situations and in the worst case the result would be some kind of mass shooting. And if the movies are using in the wrong purpose, like teaching that violence is the solution for young people would the results be horrifying. So that's why the movie makers must feel their responsibility when they are making their product for entertainment purposes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Computer researchers published a new algorithm that revolutionizes web management.
The new database structures require new and powerful tools to manage databases in non-centralized solutions. The new data structures can be ...
-
Starlink and miniaturization of the communication satellites The dream of Elon Musk is to give every people free Internet across the world...
-
The time travel in mind or using imagination Sometimes we are forgetting one thing about data handling and memory. The thing what we are f...
-
Lightweight vehicles are flexible tools in the hands of the military Jeeps were effective tools in the hands of SAS Lightweight vehicle...